Signatures 65 total
Page: 1, 2
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
7
Name: Keith Sanders on Oct 25, 2004Country: UKComments: Under no circumstances do I want a Southend relief road to go through any part of the Rochford district.Flag
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Peter D Cottis on Nov 8, 2004Country: UKComments: I am in full agreement with your views.Flag
-
22
Name: Richard Gaylor on Nov 8, 2004Country: UKComments: Even with the route planed within Southend it will effect the Cemetry and Sutton Road.Flag
- 23
- 24
-
25
Name: Alison Henwood on Nov 8, 2004Country: UKComments: We do not want destruction of our Green Belt to pay for the overdevelopment in SouthendFlag
- 26
-
27
Name: Violet Walker on Nov 9, 2004Country: UKComments: We should be looking at ways of getting people to use public transport and not building more roadsFlag
-
28
Name: Alan Tuttlebee on Nov 9, 2004Country: UKComments: A road through Rochford would be an unparallelled environmental disaster, especially if it has to be raised on stilts above sea levelFlag
-
29
Name: Stephen Lee on Nov 9, 2004Country: UKComments: Please leave our rural town alone , although i belive prior to consultation these decisions are already made behind closed doors . good luck rochford fighting this campain ,suggest petition door to door as many people are unaware of proposals, not all people read papers or have computer access.Flag
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
33
Name: Robin Payne on Nov 10, 2004Country: UKComments: The proposed route is ludicrous and of no benefit to anyone living in Rochford, Rayleigh, Hockley as no access points from these areas onto the proposed new road. Have the people of southend thought of the traffic congestion trying to reach the new road at SuttonFlag
-
34
Name: Janice Payne on Nov 10, 2004Country: UKComments: If the road does come through Rochford peripheral planning WILL follow. We must stop this now before it has begun.Flag
-
35
Name: Petra Le Grice on Nov 11, 2004Country: UKComments: I feel Green Belt land should not be sacrificed in order to provide this road.Once the treesa dn open green spaces have gone we will NEVER get them back.Please lets leave some countryside for the next generations to enjoy.Flag
-
36
Name: Chris Jemson on Nov 11, 2004Country: UKComments: keep some of our country green not under concreteFlag
-
37
Name: Stewart Jackson on Nov 12, 2004Country: UKComments: I think its disgusting to build a road through our countryside and the powers that be won't be happy untill we live in concrete jungle.Flag
-
38
Name: Amanda Clements on Nov 13, 2004Country: UKComments: If the bypass that Southend wants goes ahead this will split South Fambridge in half and spoil many acres of greenbelt. New roads just breed cars and buildingFlag
-
39
Name: Rex Berrecloth on Nov 14, 2004Country: UKComments: No relief road should be built at all, not even through Southend. Building new houses in the SE should be reduced. More funding given to boost industry and jobs should be provided by Government.Flag
-
40
Name: Alan Eades on Nov 14, 2004Country: UKComments: As the Southend route will not destroy the Green Belt of Rochford District and it will not destroy the wildlife of an area of possible scientific interest (Hullbridge)thus not damaging the environment outside of an existing urban conurbation and as Rochford District Council and Essex County Council will not oppose this route please include me in the petition.Flag
-
41
Name: Kathleen Casey on Nov 14, 2004Country: UKComments: It is essential that the green belt remains in this corner - otherwise there will gradually be no fields etc for our children and ultimately we will end up asan extension of LondonFlag
-
42
Name: Brian Csey on Nov 14, 2004Country: UKComments: It makes more sense to run the road through Southend where the biggest problems lie and to avoid loosing even more fields and green belt land. This shoudl tie in with the Government's brown field site policyFlag
-
43
Name: Lionel Barratt on Nov 30, 2004Country: UKComments: To use valuable green belt in the Rochford District would be appalling - bordering on criminal!Flag
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: Chris Lowe on Feb 3, 2005Country: UKComments: Building bypasses encourages more traffic, but Government Guidance in PPG requires that reduction in traffic, so bypass incompatible with government guidance.Flag
- 47
-
48
Name: PAUL STONER on Feb 15, 2005Country: UKComments: WE INVADE IRAQ TO GIVE THEM THE HOPE OF A DEMOCRATIC FUTURE AND DAILY THE UK HAS THE BASIS OF OUR DEMOCRACY ERODED BY SELF SEEKING BUREAUCRATS BOTH AT HOME AND IN EUROPEFlag
- 49
- 50
Page: 1, 2