Hogue Monogrip Modification Request

Signatures 165 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 51
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments: Yes, that would be great.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Jsm on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Mike Davis on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Gary Becea on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments: The suggested grip would be perfect

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Ala Dan on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments: Yes, I support this request.

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 13, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Raymond Cheng on Oct 14, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Mike Pittman on Oct 14, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Boris Borisov on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Jerry P. on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Ignacio Totorica on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Michael on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Richard Akehurst on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Jim Gilbert on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments: I have been looking for a grip like this for some time. My closest option is sawing the bottom off of my uncle mikes grip that came on my 640.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Eric Wayte on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments: Please add this grip to your product catalog. I would buy at least 2 of them.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: Im a Phoenix Az LEO and carry the SW 442 as back up. I sport the Monogrip when I qualify because its easier on the hand. But I have to put the stock grip back on to effectively carry it. If you made a shorter version I would buy it in a heartbeat.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: James on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Ralph Kuehnel Jr. on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: This is great idea...please consider!

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: I will buy one!

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Timothy Smith on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Donald Hart on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Karl Erich Martell on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: (I post as "Erich" on most forums.) This is a darned good idea. The Bantam stocks are concealable, but put my trigger finger too far through the triggerguard.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Chris on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: I would love to see a CC friendly monogrip for my old J-frame, as well as one for the SP101.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Todd Howell on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Dave Huesman on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Jay Skardon on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Do for Taurus M85 also, please.

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Jay Skardon on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Do for Taurus M85 also, please.

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Chad Pirtle on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: I'd buy at least 2!

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: David Vanderhaar on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: I wouod love to have a shorter mono grip!!!!!!

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Chris Allen on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: I would also welcome a model in the various woods offered by Hogue.

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Robert Spielman on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: D J Rodocker on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: DJ on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Beck48 on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: I need one

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Duward Blackwell on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Gunwife on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Alan Rose on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: .

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Bob Clark on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments: Great idea!!

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: TODD GREEN on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments: I WOULD PURCHASE THIS SUGGESTED PRODUCT TWO MINUTES AGO IF IT WERE AVALIABLE.

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Janet Pedersen on Oct 18, 2007

    Comments: This is an important improvement in an already terrific gun. Please make the change! Thanks.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »