Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 1053 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 22 »

  1. 51
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments: Hope it works.
    Flag
  2. 52
    Name: Pete Jefferson on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 53
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 54
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 55
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 56
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments: im disgusted, and shall be leaving as soon as my adsl line is installed
    Flag
  7. 57
    Name: Shaun Wilson on May 13, 2007
    Comments: VM keep going like this I will be back to BT very poor show from a once good service
    Flag
  8. 58
    Name: Arran J on May 13, 2007
    Comments: What a load of crap. I'll be switching if this takes effect.
    Flag
  9. 59
    Name: Cliff Ward on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 60
    Name: Keith Fairley on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 61
    Name: Graham on May 13, 2007
    Comments: Its 7pm, downloading from virgin media demos, I'm on 4GB, my download speed is 39kb/s. Disgusting, give virgin a month, or I'm off!
    Flag
  12. 62
    Name: Bosp Jobson on May 13, 2007
    Comments: Bosp it
    Flag
  13. 63
    Name: Michael M on May 13, 2007
    Comments: I'm running at 500k tonight on a 4mb connection...I've downloaded NOTHING. Sort it out, Virgin. You're happy to take our money, but by the looks of it not so happy to provide a reliable service.
    Flag
  14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments: I am disgusted by Virgin Media's decision to impose restrictions on download speeds. I currently pay for a 4mb 'unlimited' service, yet my download speeds are being HALVED in the evenings. Tell me why I should pay for a 4mb service with a 2mb output I shall be cancelling my contract with Virgin Media as soon as I get another provider set up. Screw you VM, you suck!
    Flag
  15. 65
    Name: Alasdair Bryce on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 66
    Name: Harry Deas on May 13, 2007
    Comments: sadfdsf
    Flag
  17. 67
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 68
    Name: John Seal on May 13, 2007
    Comments: I always loved NTL for there stable and untraffic shapped internet. but tbh if i get hit by this traffic shaping im off to be there and getting there ADSL2 same price as vigin medias 4 meg and you could get up to 20+meg :/ i have no idea what virgin media are thinking. there simpily shooting themselve sint he foot.
    Flag
  19. 69
    Name: Aaron Robbins on May 13, 2007
    Comments: I had my BB installed 3 days ago yet I was not told of any restrictions, if I had known i wouldn't have bothered, im tempted to cancel my contract after hearing this, why should I be told i'll get a certain speed if in actual fact I might be restricted for downloading a few files. I am absolutely disgusted, I think something should be done so that advertised speeds can be given without restrictions even if it does mean the ISP spending money, after all I'm paying for my service
    Flag
  20. 70
    Name: Rahim Ali on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 71
    Name: Virgin Brand Is A Joke! on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Very unhappy! with my "new" 20mb
    Flag
  22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 73
    Name: Brian Smith on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 74
    Name: Brian Smith on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 75
    Name: Kevin Robertson on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Virgin is already bad, DONT MAKE IT WORSE!
    Flag
  26. 76
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 77
    Name: Carl Barton on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Why am I paying for a premium service only to have it cut down to 1990's speeds when I use the service. The primary thing that has kept me at Virgin while prices have become ludicrous was its uncapped nature!
    Flag
  28. 78
    Name: Rob Priest on May 14, 2007
    Comments: I signed upto blueyonder broadband (as it was then) because of the uncapped and unlimited downloads. Changing the rules will make people look elsewhere for the service they initially went for.
    Flag
  29. 79
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 80
    Name: James Morrisroe on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Sky Suck
    Flag
  31. 81
    Name: Nigel Parker on May 14, 2007
    Comments: I've been a loyal Telewest customer for many years mainly due to their uncapped service and consistent download speeds etc.. I believe I paid a premium for that as most other services were much less. Now we have a slow muted system. If these continues I will be forced to look elsewhere.
    Flag
  32. 82
    Name: Jason Frear on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 83
    Name: P A Cartwrright on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 84
    Name: Gareth on May 14, 2007
    Comments: This is just pathetic!
    Flag
  35. 85
    Name: Dan Ashurst on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Why would they offer faster connections, (ie 20mbps) when apparently their network inferstructure cant handle the people on 10 mbps and under!! packet shaping is not the way to go... propperly configuring their network and spending a little bit of money.. which come on... they do have! i am considering switching ISP so i can get REAL service.
    Flag
  36. 86
    Name: Simon Hopkinson on May 14, 2007
    Comments: ITC should be addressing the misleading advertising, too. VM are losing a customer if they don't re-think this. As a direct result of the new restrictions introduced by VM, just about every crappy alternative broadband service is LESS crappy than this service.. and the other crappy alternatives are half the price as well.
    Flag
  37. 87
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 88
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 89
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Traffic Shaping goes against the whole point of paying for a faster connection.
    Flag
  40. 90
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Disgusting service from VM once again Unlimited means unlimited not limited. 20MB connection running at less than 2Mb speeds, this is not traffic shaping as that "improves" the network by reducing bandwidth choking but to just kill off users who pay for 20mb and get 2-3 MBps when they are home from work to pay for the service is disgusting. VM YOU SUCK.
    Flag
  41. 91
    Name: Derek Giffen on May 14, 2007
    Comments: Virgin, you should be ashamed! Thats not what we as customers signed up to. You know you're 100% in the wrong. No amount of spin can coverup what is clearly a download limit. Get it sorted.
    Flag
  42. 92
    Name: Diane Croft on May 15, 2007
    Comments: Slow speeds, traffic management, poor customer service, and "BS" reasons for the problems whenever you speak to a staff member. Utter shambles. How the regulators allow VM to get away with this level of service is beyond me.
    Flag
  43. 93
    Name: Cameron on May 15, 2007
    Comments: I have ADSL in the property now, despite also having Virgin. Does the fact I'd rather pay for your service until my contract is up and spend money elsewhere tell you why you need to get your finger out, Mr Burch Your company is a joke.
    Flag
  44. 94
    Name: Chris B on May 15, 2007
    Comments: Virgin Media do not need to 'shape' the network, the network is far fast enough to cope with the users, it has been fine for me 24/7 for the last 3 years....I don't see why you need to manage traffic like this, surely you don't want to loose even more customers to Virgins rival, because that is what will happen. Then say goodbye to Virgin, all because of silly traffic 'shaping'. If you think people are going to pay for a service that is capped at the times they can only use it but could get alot more speed for the same pricce elsewhere then I think you need to do some major market research.
    Flag
  45. 95
    Name: Mark W on May 15, 2007
    Comments: bloody discusting,first they lose channels now bragging about faster internet speeds which we cant get,who wants too browse the net with 10 or 20 meg............
    Flag
  46. 96
    Name: M. Sargent on May 15, 2007
    Comments: This will be the last straw for me too im afraid loosing some of my favourite channels and then capping a service which you advertise with no limits. i use xbox live and download many demos and updates from live so will be capped a great deal. therefore if this does come into place you will loose my custom and many many others. and i as many am sure it will be bye bye vm!
    Flag
  47. 97
    Name: Anonymous on May 15, 2007
    Comments: This is unfair, more than unreasonable.. Looks like we will be switching to sky!
    Flag
  48. 98
    Name: Darren Stone on May 15, 2007
    Comments: I was going to go onto the 10mb service until I found that most of the time I'd only be getting a 5mb service. I can pay £17.99 a month and get more than that with Tiscali ADSL.
    Flag
  49. 99
    Name: Dave Taylor on May 15, 2007
    Comments: Total joke. I spend over £100 with VM when you factor in telephone calls. Drop these plans or I'll be cancelling all services.
    Flag
  50. 100
    Name: V.Smith on May 15, 2007
    Comments: £18.00 a month for what is effectively 1Mbit when i get home from work.. that's not value, imo my sister in law was getting capped to 512kbits from 1mbit for £18.00 a month (older set top box).. she just left for sky.. can't blame her my father in law, who never uses his connection but once or twice and month to check e-mail, I tested a download and after 20 minutes it cuts to half speed.. how can he be in the top 5% top 5% is a lie.. please sort this out virgin
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 22 »

Sponsored links