Decrease Lethal Smog Output

Signatures 30 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Jane on Mar 13, 2010

   Comments: Dear Ms. Jackson: As someone who cares about keeping our planet clean, I am deeply concerned by the amount of pollution we produce. I am particularly concerned by the amount of smog we have produced. This smog can be harmful in many ways. Sometimes it can be fatal to human beings and other animals. In minor cases it might cause throat irritation, but in major cases it can cause lung cancer, asthma, bronchitis, heart attacks, and premature death. It can also cause damage to crops and plants. For all these reasons, I strongly urge you to adopt the proposed new EPA regulations tightening the limit on smog-producing pollutants. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, Jane

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Nils Keiten-Schmitz on Mar 15, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Bill & Helena Malarkey on Mar 15, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Verena Frees on Mar 15, 2010

   Comments: Sehr geehrte Frau Jackson, ich stimme fuer die vorgeschlagenen neuen EPA-Vorschriften (Verschaerfung der Grenzwert der Smog-Produktion Schadstoffe), um die Umwelt zu entlasten und Krankheiten bzw.. vorzeitige Todesfaelle hierdurch zu mindern! Dies ist eine weltweite Problematik und ich wuensche mir, dass immer mehr Menschen diese Probleme erkennen und beginnen zu handeln, damit unsere Kinder und Enkel auch ein gesundes und langes Leben haben koennen.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 15, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Michele Krohn on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Dennis Malarkey & Carol Malarkey on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Sonja Knecht on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Mathias Knecht on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Katy Housen on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Megan Malarkey on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Frank Sambuco on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments: We need to protect our children and their children against thid pollution that eventually will cause them great medical and physical harm.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Tiffany Szpara on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Sarah Dwinger on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Aline Taenzer on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Abby Lamont on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Annett Thom on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Roger on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Samantha Govender on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Eva Tacha on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Samantha Nakhoul on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: I'm on it! the planet needs our consciousness now more than ever Thank you Max/Helena

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Daniela Knecht on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Handiak-christophe Theodora on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Simon Ward on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: A worthy cause indeed. Many US citizens believe that their country should keep up with the rest of the western world on the fight against pollution - it's long past time that the US government caught up!!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: The true cost of producing smog should be reflected on the producer's bottom line. Not doing so is a distortion of the profitability calculation. Requiring companies to invest in technology that reduces their smog production actually boosts the clean-technology sector of our economy.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: BEATRIZ FLORES on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Chris Holzer on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Roxie Schliesmann on Mar 24, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Hanni Papadima on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Michelle Barton on Mar 27, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1