| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 301 | Zig Markowski - KM9M | I agree with the petition as presented. |
| 302 | LU1DZ | The World Wide South America CW Contest rules point:
V - Categories:
Single Operator
Those stations at which one person performs all of the operating, logging, and spotting functions. The use of DX alerting assistance of any kind places the station Multi Operator category.
XIII - Disqualification:
The use of non-amateur means such as telephones, emails, telegrams, spots, DX-Cluster, DX-Net, Packet Radio Cluster, etc., to ilicit contacts or multipliers during a contest is unsportsmanlike and the entry is subject to disqualification.
Then we dont need to make any change in WWSA rules.
73 and good CW |
| 303 | Ed Sawyer | I could also accept it being in Assisted if there is suffecient desire by that group. But if it is banned totally, it wouldn't hurt my feelings.
Ed |
| 304 | JORGE DIEZ | Please avoid all this in our contest activity!!!... |
| 305 | Vladimir (Willy) Umanets | |
| 306 | Diego Salom LU8ADX / AY8A | |
| 307 | YO9GJX | |
| 308 | Andi UU0JM | |
| 309 | F8BXI | |
| 310 | Yury Hmelenko RL3FT | I agree with this petition, but how we can control use of Skimmer lockal net-work? |
| 311 | Vaso, YT1XX | |
| 312 | Niko Lappalainen, OH5JTD | |
| 313 | Mike Stokes KK9V | This type of technology should not be acceptable in ANY contest. |
| 314 | Ari Pietikainen,oh2bsi | |
| 315 | Jean-Paul | Cw and only real CW in contest |
| 316 | Bill OKain K4LTA | |
| 317 | Gerry Treas, K8GT / WY8DX | |
| 318 | Lester D. Grandon K5LG | |
| 319 | Jukka Tarvainen, OH4MFA | |
| 320 | Will Roberts AA4NC | |
| 321 | Akira Asai, JA8RWU | contesting --- discipline, progressive, trial and error, deriving ability...
and have fun on cw with using our good/better own human ear! |
| 322 | D Priest W3CF | |
| 323 | Teemu S. Korhonen, SM0W | |
| 324 | Robert Weinstock, W3RQ | |
| 325 | Wesley Hjalmar Lindquist | I agree with the petition as it is. PY5FB / PY2RW / PR5W |
| 326 | Dariusz Tatarski | VE3FDT |
| 327 | Petr Ourednik | OK1RP |
| 328 | Ann Santos WA1S | |
| 329 | David LeDuc N1IX | |
| 330 | Anonymous | DIDN'T LIKE THE SKIMMER IDEA. |
| 331 | Larry Menzel, W0PR | It was bad enough when computers took over logging, duping and sending. NO SKIMMER! Let's keep this a human challenge. |
| 332 | Mike wr5u | |
| 333 | Robye Lahlum, W1MK | |
| 334 | Artur SP3CW | No comment needed I guess...
CW 4ever ! (without PCs support, hi!) |
| 335 | Susan King K5DU | |
| 336 | JOSE CASTILLO -N1BAA | FULLY AGREE!
NO SKIMMERS! |
| 337 | Andrew Roos ZS6AA | I love CW contesting as a test of operator skill. Skimmer would make it into a "battle of the skimmer bots" that would no longer interest or challenge me. |
| 338 | Girts Budis YL2KL | |
| 339 | Normunds Sne, YL3DQ/YL5T | |
| 340 | Gwyn Williams | |
| 341 | Maurice Charpentier, F5NQL | |
| 342 | Mike Lafferty, W2TB | |
| 343 | John Shannon - K3WWP | CW should be kept a traditional mode and subject as little as possible to computer automation. It should remain a mode where the operator's brain, not some computer chip, is used to decode what is being sent. For a good example of how CW contesting should be, visit the North American QRP CW Club web site at http://www.usatek.net/~yoel/ and check out our monthly sprints rules. |
| 344 | Peter T. Liaros | |
| 345 | Jim, W1KQ | Well, let's just go back to straight key/semi-auto cw only. Automated copy is difficult with a less than perfect electronic fist. No Skimmer please. |
| 346 | Bill DeLage, K1SE | |
| 347 | Anonymous | |
| 348 | Martin Snow GW3PRL | |
| 349 | Daniel Gravereaux, N1ZZ | An operator is required to add skill to any competition |
| 350 | Vidi - ZS1EL | CW contesting requires personal skills which takes years to develop. Skimmer is a very clever computer game for which there is no place in a CW contest. |