Signatures 669 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
9
Name: Gia Gvaladze on Apr 29, 2008Comments: I fully agree with this, though probabely hard to control the actual use 73 GiaFlag
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
13
Name: Oliver Sweningsen on Apr 29, 2008Comments: This is a form of assistance; on the order of packet radio.Flag
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
19
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008Comments: The CW Skimmer would signal the end of my interest in CW contesting. It's like allowing steroids in sports.Flag
-
20
Name: Arthur R. Trampler on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Such a degree of automation will remove the necessity for operator skill, perseverance and courtesy. Please reject all application and use of Skimmer in CW contests! K0ROFlag
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
29
Name: Milton Garb on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Can't we just keep the hobby at it's current competitive level without all of this cheating crapFlag
-
30
Name: David B. Ritchie on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Nice technology - not appropriate for contesting.Flag
-
31
Name: Roberto Soro I2WIJ on Apr 29, 2008Comments: I agree with the terms of this petition. Keep CWSkimmer out of CW Contesting.Flag
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
39
Name: Vitor L A Santos, PY2NY on Apr 29, 2008Comments: SO2R ok, N1MM Logger ok, amplifier for HP category ok, Cluster at assisted category ok... Skimmer will put away CW operators capabilities. Big chance to have "Skimmer people" going far than "real CW ops" there... Nothing against VE3NEA or his nice software, but this is not exactly good for contests...Flag
-
40
Name: George Schultz on Apr 29, 2008Comments: I'm afraid this is going to be like amplifiers and VFO's for CB'ers--difficult to control. Contesting in general has already become such a computer-game--"single operator assisted," Super-Check Partial, band-maps, etc, etc. Unless we're going to entertain a "fully automated" category, this skimmer-business seems a good place to draw the line. Now about these "CHAT (CHEAT) ROOMS" during contests...Flag
- 41
- 42
- 43
-
44
Name: Kirk Pickering K4RO on Apr 30, 2008Comments: I would prefer to maintain CW contesting as an OPERATOR sport, where the operator has to decode the signals heard. Wide band decoding technology may possibly have a place in digital mode contests, but it feels inappropriate for CW contests. In my opinion, it's a shame that packet/cluster use wasn't nipped in the bud when we had a chance. Who knew it would actually lower operating skills Perhaps we can dodge this bullet before it's too late. 73Flag
- 45
- 46
-
47
Name: 5B4AGM on Apr 30, 2008Comments: I havn't any credit card and PayPal. How I send the donationFlag
-
48
Name: 5B4AGM on Apr 30, 2008Comments: I havn't any credit card and PayPal. How I send the donationFlag
- 49
-
50
Name: Jd Thomas on Apr 30, 2008Comments: Now let's also have a petition requesting that no more than 5w be used in qrp class no more than 100w be used in low power class no more than 1500w be used in hp classFlag