Sign Up to Fight Workplace Size Discrimination!

Signatures 607 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 13 › »

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments: I think the cdc should take down the site.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Jacqueline Gazella, RN, MS on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Cynthia Southern on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Laura Schofield-Pierson on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments: We are doing our human population a huge dis-service by beliveing that health has a look to it, We need to wake up and see the discrimination that is truly involved.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments: Not only does this website promote discrimination, the science behind it is deeply flawed.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anne Kaplan on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments: It is perfectly normal for people to be a full range of sizes, and no amount of bias, hatred, bad science, discrimination, misinformation, or stupid calculator websites will ever change that. The CDC should not be in the genocide business, yet they are using MY tax money to try to eliminate an entire phenotype. This must stop.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Maureen Wood on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments: Time and money could be better spent elsewhere.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Laura Brand-Ballard on Jul 27, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Cynthia Gardner on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Leanne Vincent on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Deb Lemire on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: With this tool, the CDC has just given their blessing to discriminate base on size.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Debora Esty on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Laurie Broussard on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Kelly Bliss on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: This "Leanworks" website condones and institutionalizes size-prejudice. DO NOT SPEND MY TAX DOLLARS TO ENCOURAGE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ME!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Becky Barker on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: I am a person of size and do not suffer from any of the health issues you are so busy stressing. Should it not be a matter of health and not size

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Linda Bacon on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Joyce Huff on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Desumeur on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: approved

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Cathy R. Grinels on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: It is time for the CDC and other agencies to present non-biased information about size. When statistics are quoted, I would like to see how those statistics were gathered and applied to the research at hand.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: End all discrimination!

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Cathy Miller on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Lizbeth Binks Carney on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: This is not legal, this is not moral, and this is not decent. Nor is there any *evidence* to suggest that it will result in any decrease in average weights of Americans. Just a lot of hassles at work in a terrifying economy, and a fueling of prejudice and discrimination. This must stop.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Natalie Elpert on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Melissa Waldron on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Lesleigh Owen on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Raejean French on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: This is discriminatory in the same sense that using the credit report of someone who is already hurting for a job will only contribute to the problem and not its solution. How many more people could be sitting at home and becoming even more inactive or unable to afford healthier foods if employers take this approach all too literally You are being extremely short-sighted.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Suzette Wickham on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Orietta Simeon on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Margaret Kent-Hanby on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: More time, energy, and resources should be focused on health in general rather than singling out one group of people based on size which has little to do with overall health.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Jean Evans on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: The CDC site will do nothing but give reason to employers to find ways to discriminate against their employees.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Erin Erlinger on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Magda Erik-Soussi on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Carol M. Anthonisen on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Lane Hatfield on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Robert Sponaugle on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments: would you sngle out any other group, such as women gays, or minorities and publish how much they cost

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Golda Poretsky, H.H.C. on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Barbara A. Bruno on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: John Pachja on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Cher Rue on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Pat Bryant on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Nicole Bliss on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Rachel Josloff on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Marilyn Wann on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Sarah L. Crowder on Jul 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 13 › »