Signatures 143 total
- 1
-
2
Name: Steve Crofford on Sep 30, 2009Comments: Get rid of this disgusting spam maker named Sidewiki!Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009Comments: This is beyond a joke. Another stupid idea by Google as they dictate to the whole internet whatever they want.Flag
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009Comments: This thing needs to be opt-in only -- OR give website owners the right to moderate comments related to their own domains.Flag
- 10
-
11
Name: Ken Perry on Sep 30, 2009Comments: This is just sooooo wrong on so many levels....why did google do this to usFlag
- 12
-
13
Name: David Marshall on Oct 1, 2009Comments: This must stop. Is Google going to reimburse me for the time it takes to police comment spam for all of my sitesFlag
- 14
-
15
Name: Jack McCullough on Oct 1, 2009Comments: This is a useless feature, and a waste of time. Spammers are already high-jacking comments, and rendering the idea useless.Flag
- 16
-
17
Name: Anonymous on Oct 1, 2009Comments: The negative implications of SideWiki are simply enormous. This toolbar must not be allowed.Flag
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
29
Name: Kim on Oct 2, 2009Comments: Google has NO business creating ANY additions that take up teal estate on MY page!!Flag
- 30
- 31
-
32
Name: Mike Humphreys on Oct 2, 2009Comments: SideWiki will cause more harm than good. Googe, what were you thinking!Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Oct 2, 2009Comments: The web is not immune from the constitution! Our websites are personal property, and not to be used by others without our express permission!Flag
- 34
-
35
Name: Nick on Oct 2, 2009Comments: This is so wrong. Business could be ruined by malicious postings.Flag
- 36
-
37
Name: Phyllis Wheeler on Oct 2, 2009Comments: It is imperative that Web site owners be able to turn Sidewiki off or edit the comments, to safeguard against spam.Flag
-
38
Name: Rike Wedding on Oct 2, 2009Comments: As someone who spend a 1,000 hours created a hobby business website, it saddens me to think it will be marred by persons who look at it for a few minutes, and do not actually try the product. The subject was on the Wiki for a while and received tons of comments from persons who definitely had no experience with the product. The opportunity for abuse is VERY HIGH and not worth the info. The web is and open place - not a place for Google to pollute. They should be stopped.Flag
- 39
- 40
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Oct 2, 2009Comments: Sidewiki serves no purpose other than harm being done to legitimate online businesses. There are enough Blogs and Commentary sites to air ones feelings.Flag
-
42
Name: Anonymous on Oct 2, 2009Comments: Sidewiki has no useful purpose. It serves only to allow yet another platform for spammers and disreputable people to create chaos on the web.Flag
- 43
- 44
-
45
Name: Laura Childs on Oct 3, 2009Comments: If you need a comment, email me. But having worked on the web over 10 years now I know how this SideWiki can be a black-hat, abuser, and trolls dream come true. SideWiki must be stopped or webmasters must be given a way to opt our websites out of it.Flag
-
46
Name: Mandy on Oct 5, 2009Comments: This thing is beyond dangerous and to not give webmasters an opportunity to opt-out is beyond arrogant. Google has no right to force content onto my page.Flag
- 47
-
48
Name: Antone Roundy on Oct 5, 2009Comments: At an ABSOLUTE MINIMUM, domain owners MUST be enabled to monitor ALL comments on their sites from a single location, which SHOULD support email notification and RSS subscription to new comments. Anything less is Google Doing Evil.Flag
- 49
-
50
Name: Scott Charters on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Do nothing that on first glance looks "evil" then if the unwashed ones have any issues after further review, stop replying to questions and say the Chinese made us do it.Flag