Save Monroe County Taxpayers $18 million: Stop the Stampede for a More Costly Campus for Monroe Community College!

Signatures 257 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »

1. 101
   Name: Lori Mack on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments: Save the tax payers money

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Afia Cannie on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Darryl Settles on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments: The city should stop the current process and evaluate all options fairly, Downtown Rochester businesses and residents deserve this chance and the city should not ignore a whopping $18M savings opportunity.

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Sue Vacchio on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Celeste Heath on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Jerry Chu on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments: I am for it. Anything project, development or action that can save the taxpayers' money and also revitalize the building or area, I am for it. It's a win win for the building, county and school

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Danny Cashman on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Glenda Prins on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments: This is the center of Rochester downtown; a vibrant college campus would strengthen that center and also provide a vital location for student life.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Cidney Maitland on Feb 7, 2013

   Comments: Delay the vote, they deserve a hearing

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Michelle Arnold on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Richard E. Quinby on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: To waste this much money there must be powerful people with great influence. This is exactly what causes the populace to have no faith in government. Hopefully someone will act honestly and prudently.

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: India Cleary on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Stacy Nikitin on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Elliot Vos on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: Keep students downtown. Help revitalize the city center.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Heather Danielson on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Melissa Ramirez on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: the community needs Damon campus where it is now. it's convenient for many of us

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Rich Ignizio on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Douglas Larson on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: Sounds like another Maggie spending spree that will eventually be just another bill for the taxpayers.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Dr. Wayne J. Montague,Sr. on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: WinnCompanies will save you money and WinnCompanies is a outstanding company to work with.

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Dave Brajcki on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Carol Greenslade on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: Winn's reputation stands on its own and always delivers what is proposed.

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Cory Tinsley on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Joan Russell on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: stop the costly stampede to the Kodak site by postponing the February 12th vote, and to demand that state, county and college officials take a step back and a hard look at the Sibley Building's money-saving proposal.

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Dan Glading on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: At a time when every dollar counts, taxpayers deserve a small delay for consideration of large potential savings.

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Jose Oliver on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: The Sibley Building Is Way More Convenient To Me As A Student Since I Live Right Behind The Amtrak Train Station & The Sibley Building Is Just A Few Minutes Away.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Britt Phillips on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Susan Stephens on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: Don't waste the taxpayer's money.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: 18 million dollars is a lot of coin.

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Barbara Riser on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Lindsay McLaughlin on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Mark Simon on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Mark Simon on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Mark Simon on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Sean Walsh on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: Please stop the costly stampede to the Kodak site by postponing the February 12th vote, and to demand that state, county and college officials take a step back and a hard look at the Sibley Building's money-saving proposal.

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Teresa Mowatt on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: Winn does an outstanding job!

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: J. Douglas Martin on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: I believe MCC should remain at its current location - Sibleys- as it is the middle of downtown Rochester and will attract other businesses to locate there also because of the increased traffic. It will also save the taxpayers of Monroe County millions of dollars in taxes. Renovation costs at Kodak plus the cost of moving will be saved.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Sean Pearson on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Tyler Wolf on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Sharon Bloemendaal on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: I was against the Sibley building intially, because I thought that there was more parking available at the Kodak site. I discovered that there is actually more parking available downtown.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »