Signatures 257 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »
-
51
Name: Lynn Malboeuf on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: Robin Boersner on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Michael Addy on Feb 6, 2013Comments: no more taxFlag
-
54
Name: Sandra Lake & Jason Karp on Feb 6, 2013Comments: It's our taxpayer money. Simply review Winn's proposal. This issue has been discussed for a long time. More time may make a better decision for all involved.Flag
-
55
Name: Brian Sanner on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Charles A. Riddle on Feb 6, 2013Comments: Winn has a proven track record of rehabilitating distressed historical properties.Flag
-
58
Name: Nicole Henderson on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
59
Name: Robert Scott Grippo on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: David Palumbo on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Michelle Moriello on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Amy Thomas on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Lisa Trede on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
65
Name: Michele Zuck on Feb 6, 2013Comments: The County needs to take a step back and keep politics out of the decision making process. Thigs have changed dramatically in the last few months that warrant another look at the Sibley proposal. A vibrant campus can add dramatically to a vibrant downtown.Flag
-
66
Name: Ellen Kelley on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
67
Name: John Spahn on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Willie Jackson on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Jeffrey Fuller on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Sebastian Petix on Feb 6, 2013Comments: This should be given fair and serious consideration.Flag
-
74
Name: Monique Lilly-Moore on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Joyce Wall on Feb 7, 2013Comments: I ask that you please pospone the vote on February 12 and take another look at the Sibley Building's money saving proposal.Flag
-
77
Name: Barbara Gonyeo on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Kerry Hughes on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Jeannette Fleming on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Jeannette Fleming on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: Eric Falla on Feb 7, 2013Comments: This move is not neccesary or fiscally responsible.Flag
-
82
Name: James Combs on Feb 7, 2013Comments: MCC has been illogical about this. Kodak on State St. is not a bad place to move to, but the reasons they give for moving there don't make sense. They have not been clear as to how this will benefit the students and taxpayers. Plus, how can they turn down the proposal Winn is offering? I am a student who has attended the Damon campus for a class over the summer back in 2011.Flag
-
83
Name: Scott Terry on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Jody Brooks on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Maddie Willer on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Lisa DeClerck on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Jerry Wolf on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: Steave Marcelle on Feb 7, 2013Comments: very good ideaFlag
-
89
Name: Stephanie Lewis on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Winn does an amazing job to tranform a run down building into a cutting edge, full of life, a place that the community would be very impressed by.Flag
-
91
Name: Mike Austin on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: John Spahn on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Lisa Spahn on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Thomas Fennell on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Ricky Thomas on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
96
Name: Rob Johnson on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
97
Name: Rob Johnson on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Charles Warney on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Great opportunity for the community!Flag
-
100
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag