Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 257 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 »

  1. 1
    Name: Cate Michel on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Amey Owen on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Alison Morra on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Caitlin Culver on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Zack DeClerck on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Eric Uenas on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: The County should be in NO RUSH to move on this proposal until all the facts are in. MCC has a 5 year contract to stay where they are. Waiting 3 years to make a good decision is a better course.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Bill Bartlett on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Ed Cafasso on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: John Flynn on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Deanna Varble on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Brian Labigan on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Janice Wollinger on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: I support the delay of the proposed February 12th vote.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Samuel Ross on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Rachel Edwards on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Tammy Vakiener on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Frank J Freida on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Adam Smith on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: Let's keep MCC's downtown campus in the heart of downtown Rochester and in this historic building!
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Joe Eddy on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Alisha Alletto on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Scott Gonyeo on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: Let's stop wasting taxpayer money!
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Beth Ranches on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Tara Perry on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Amy M Bence on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: John Kuppens on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: I believe it to be fiscally irresponsible not to allow Winn a fair opportunity to present their plan for the building and the taxpayers.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Michele Addy on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Charles Warney on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Massey Casper on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: in an economy where jobs,revenues and good fiscal sense is much in need, the numbers do not support the haphazard decision making of the Monroe County Legislature to not pay close attention to the Sibley Building money saving proposals
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Odis P. Coleman on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: I believe that a thorough review of the Winn proposal is warranted. In these days of fiscal problems faced by most municipalities, even avenue should be taken to reduce costs to taxpayers.
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Beth Hartman on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: David Lenar on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Tony Schiavone on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: I think that anytime tax money can be saved - it should be.
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Natalie Ginegllo on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: LeAnn Hanfield on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Jason Mcdonald on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Melinda Anderson-Perry on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Darien Crimmin on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Stefanie on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Eli Herman on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: I think that the Sibley Building proposal needs a more thorough examination. A less costly option should be considered.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 »

Sponsored links