Signatures 257 total
-
1
Name: Cate Michel on Feb 4, 2013Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Amey Owen on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Alison Morra on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Caitlin Culver on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Zack DeClerck on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Eric Uenas on Feb 6, 2013Comments: The County should be in NO RUSH to move on this proposal until all the facts are in. MCC has a 5 year contract to stay where they are. Waiting 3 years to make a good decision is a better course.Flag
-
16
Name: Bill Bartlett on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Ed Cafasso on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: John Flynn on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Deanna Varble on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Brian Labigan on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Janice Wollinger on Feb 6, 2013Comments: I support the delay of the proposed February 12th vote.Flag
-
24
Name: Samuel Ross on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Rachel Edwards on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Tammy Vakiener on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Frank J Freida on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Adam Smith on Feb 6, 2013Comments: Let's keep MCC's downtown campus in the heart of downtown Rochester and in this historic building!Flag
-
29
Name: Joe Eddy on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Alisha Alletto on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Scott Gonyeo on Feb 6, 2013Comments: Let's stop wasting taxpayer money!Flag
-
32
Name: Beth Ranches on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Tara Perry on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Amy M Bence on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: John Kuppens on Feb 6, 2013Comments: I believe it to be fiscally irresponsible not to allow Winn a fair opportunity to present their plan for the building and the taxpayers.Flag
-
36
Name: Michele Addy on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Charles Warney on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Massey Casper on Feb 6, 2013Comments: in an economy where jobs,revenues and good fiscal sense is much in need, the numbers do not support the haphazard decision making of the Monroe County Legislature to not pay close attention to the Sibley Building money saving proposalsFlag
-
39
Name: Odis P. Coleman on Feb 6, 2013Comments: I believe that a thorough review of the Winn proposal is warranted. In these days of fiscal problems faced by most municipalities, even avenue should be taken to reduce costs to taxpayers.Flag
-
40
Name: Beth Hartman on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: David Lenar on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Tony Schiavone on Feb 6, 2013Comments: I think that anytime tax money can be saved - it should be.Flag
-
43
Name: Natalie Ginegllo on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: LeAnn Hanfield on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Jason Mcdonald on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Melinda Anderson-Perry on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Darien Crimmin on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Stefanie on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Eli Herman on Feb 6, 2013Comments: I think that the Sibley Building proposal needs a more thorough examination. A less costly option should be considered.Flag