SEBI No Entry Load Proposal

Signatures 113 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Sandeep Bhargava ARN-0533 on Jun 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Gagandeep Singh on Jun 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 23, 2009

   Comments: SEBI decisiion to implement no entry load is the murder of the indian capital market and savings systems. It is totally autocratic way of implementing its own decision under the pressure of some lobby. SEBI must learn that no entity in this world runs without marketing and distribution system. It is shameful !

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments: ARN-44318 , We are aginst the sebi press release regarding no distributor fee/No entry load

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Pramod Kumar, Milestone Portfolio on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments: As IFA, we are against the decision of SEBI, that is NO ENTRY LOAD, NO DISTRIBUTOR FEE. THIS DECISION IS TOO EARLY, SO WE ALL HAS TO PROTEST AGAINST THIS. : Milestone Portfolio Consultants Pvt Ltd (ARN-37133)

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: ATUL MUKHI on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Rajesh Puri on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Sandeep Gupta on Jun 24, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Neeraj Chauhan on Jun 24, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 24, 2009

    Comments: The decision by sebi to abolish all entry load in all mutual fund schemes and take fees directly from investor .It is not possible to take any fees from investor .Earlier SEBI decided that the investor can invest money directly without entryload .But it has been seen that only 5%money has been invested directly and 95%investment comes through distribution channel partner .It means investor cannot invest money without distribution channel partner .Like this mutual fund industry and distribution channel partner will spoil soon. SAVE MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY .

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Prabhjit Singh on Jun 24, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Brij Mohan, ARN-1407 on Jun 24, 2009

    Comments: In view of above, SEBI may have a relook at the whole issue and cause a solution to the problem which is fair to all stake holders i.e. investors, AMCs and distributors.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Maj Ashish Chadha on Jun 24, 2009

    Comments: once you have given direct load free ,i dont see any logic in giving variable load . Even if u choose to give variable load please dont take two cheques and instead make it on the form because it will be an administrative nightmare ,u will push clients to Ulips ,if your objective is to increase insurance company valuation then it is a great step. p .

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: it is the major loss for distribution lobby

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: As SEBI is a service provider to participants in the

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: K Murali on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: I fully support the views as above

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Palani Dhamodar on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Edward on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: I fully agree with the views

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: I want to say that go for Suprem Court against SEBI Proposal & take the stay order. I am with you. Thanks Keshaw Lal ARN-41632

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: SANDEEP BHARGAVA on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: CAN SEBI ENSURE THAT EVEN AFTER DOING ALL THIS, THE INVESTOR WILL BE ULTIMATELY BENEFITTED

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Rajesh Guliani ARN-2823 on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: All the points are very genuine and needs prompt and positive action.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: One of my friends remarked Is SEBI is acronym for "SYSTEMATIC ELEMINATION OF BROKERS AND INTERMEDIARIES"

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Sundar on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments: s we the distributors played a vital role in the mutual fund industry ,kindly all the distributors stand together atleast now to appose this entryload abolition amendements .sebi and amfi r just avoiding the distributors and they r not allowing us 2 survive in this profession .thnx

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Neelesh J Shah on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: ACHAL GUPTA on Jun 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: J P Stanley on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments: I fully endorse the above petition. I also wish to state that SEBI has only proved that it completely is ignorant and is not at all aware what this industry is and the AMCs have also shown shallow understanding of the efforts Intermediaries and distributors contribute to the welfare of the investors. SEBI has time and again proved that it works only for the welfare of Rich investors.Proof no load for direct investments.And now sweeping benefits to Rich investors. Kuduos to the SEBI for attempting to demolish the established distributors network for 3-4 decades.I can only pity them for they do not know what they are doing.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Laxman Kumar on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments: SEBI DIKTAT SPELLS DOOM FOR MUTUALFUND ADVISORS IN INDIA,SEBI DONT FORCE SELF EMPLOYED PEOPLE AS UNEMPLOYED. LAXMAN KUMAR ARN0197

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Niranjan Bangera 48188 on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: PRABHAKARA GUPTA M ARN -28861 on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments: I strongly recommend the SEBI to implement the entry load where the Mutual Fund Industry can survive, otherwise slowly the industry will disappear.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Madhusudhan P Gad on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Ramesh Bhat - ARN-2130 on Jun 26, 2009

    Comments: I am CEO of M/s. Aniram

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Rahul on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: involve IFA in planning policies for MF industry

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Yashpal J Joshi on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: Dear Sir, We support the petition & would also like to add, that once direct investments are free from load.. the new ruling of variable entry load is redicilous.. Regards. Yashpal J Joshi ARN-51273 09422104686

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Sanjay Tiwari on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: Sanjay Tiwari ARN 44974 Bangalore

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anand Acharya-arn-36183 on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: This has been the most ridiculous Order issued by SEBI. It must be scrapped through help from PMO and FMO.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Nibha Jain on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: S.T. on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: Friends i think some body is taking us for a ride. No petition. just trying to get some money.Be careful about this petition.PETITION ARN-420

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jayant Harde ARN 37779 on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: Pl join at Mumbai on 29th June 09 at 2 Pm, we from Nagpur Independent Mutual Fund Distributor Association shall be there.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Jatinder Madan, ARN-20619 on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Asheesh Arora on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: It is illeagal and unconstitutional. We should be paid for our work rather we should beg for it.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2009

    Comments: I agree to the facts written above.If possible i heartly request SEBI to look into this load structure once again.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Sandeep Arora on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: ARN-6574 Vikas Batra on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments: when investors have already been given the option of direct then why so much fuss about no entry load, which shows that SEBI chief wants service with cutting into ourselves, please dont allow such things to flourish in a democratic country

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Iqbal Singh on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments: If No Entry Load will remail same in future then i strongly proposed to Mr.Bhave that he should also imposed this kind of action on ULIP with immediate effect, bcoz ULIP swallow the money of investers not Mutul Fund or otherwise We Mutual Fund Advisor will implement this on roads of India, Mr.Bhave Mind it strongly.......................beware off

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: J.P.Goswami on Jun 28, 2009

    Comments: Mutual Funds were meant to serve small investor but the whole concept has been hijacked by HNIs and under their pressure SEBI has brought this proposal in the garb of saving the interest of small investor. These HNIs have to pay lacs of rupees as entry loads and hence the concept of first no entry load on direct investments and now no entry load on any investment. It is for AMCs also to oppose this move as it is they who will be hit more than any body else as most of the small investments come through only distributors. Distributors cannot be left at the mercy of immature investors who wont like to pay anything but expect every kind of service free of cost.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3