Say no to Guernsey MIR reductions

Signatures 1225 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 25 › »

1. 251
   Name: Michael Pollmer on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 252
   Name: Patrick Devaney on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 253
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 254
   Name: Chris Tebble on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 255
   Name: Lisa Eyre on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 256
   Name: Sarah Tebble on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 257
   Name: ANN ATKIN on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 258
   Name: Alan Le Page on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 259
   Name: Carla Blackmore on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 260
    Name: Martin Bougourd on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 261
    Name: Kelly Bougourd on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 262
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 263
    Name: Steve Kendal on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: Stupid idea, how will anyone get on the property ladder, we will end up spending more money on providing states accommodation!

    Flag
14. 264
    Name: Anna Williams on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 265
    Name: Michelle Zugg on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: I can only just about live as it is, with out my relief I might just not survive.

    Flag
16. 266
    Name: Matt Hutchins on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 267
    Name: Lucy Humphries on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 268
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 269
    Name: Sharon Horsley on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 270
    Name: Helen Gallienne on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 271
    Name: Joe Le Cheminant on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: as usual the people who can least afford it are targetted by those who probably have no idea of or need for a mortgage on their first or their second, third and god knows however many others "homes", wherever they may be located around the world. Not to mention the knock-on effect on the local housing market and associated services.

    Flag
22. 272
    Name: Nikie Coquelin on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 273
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 274
    Name: J Le Page on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 275
    Name: Joelle Goasdoue on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: don't do it!

    Flag
26. 276
    Name: Peter Garnham on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: Not fair on the hardworking class who are already struggling.

    Flag
27. 277
    Name: Sophie Garnham on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: First time buyers need help to get on the housing ladder and reduce the Social housing needs.

    Flag
28. 278
    Name: Levi Garnham on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: They need to find another alternative proposal , may be limit first time buyers relief for first ten years instead of removing it completely.

    Flag
29. 279
    Name: Nikki Brouard on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 280
    Name: Rick Felbabel on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: I diagree with each of Gavin St P's reasons for going ahead with this. I believe it will badly affect 1st time buyers & have little effect on so-called property inflation.

    Flag
31. 281
    Name: Craig Garnham on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: I cant afford a mortgage at present , but would like this to remain so i can aim to in the future, most people are struggling so what take it away and cause more problems with rent increases.

    Flag
32. 282
    Name: Chris Creber on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 283
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 284
    Name: Louise Mahieux on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 285
    Name: Catherine Robin on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 286
    Name: Michael Robin on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 287
    Name: Karen Lane on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: In these difficult times abolishing this tax relief will have a devastating affect on our local economy, as the lower middle earners who have been forced to take large mortgages will struggle further to live day to day, meaning they will have even less money to be able to support our local retail industry for one. Please reconsider for the locals.

    Flag
38. 288
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 289
    Name: Christina Huddle on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 290
    Name: Sion Turian on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: It's an absolutely ridiculous idea

    Flag
41. 291
    Name: Jenna Littlewood on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 292
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments: Why do you keep hitting the middle earners!

    Flag
43. 293
    Name: Guy Mallett on Nov 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 294
    Name: Nikki Trebert on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 295
    Name: Jon Guillou on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments: no no no.

    Flag
46. 296
    Name: Jackie Mauger on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 297
    Name: Adrian Welch on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 298
    Name: Karyn Le Marquand on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments: shall we sale our houses and not work, have more children and then go get a states house

    Flag
49. 299
    Name: Tim Hancock on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments: We need to encourage people to buy their own houses NOT encourage them to expect the States to give them one!

    Flag
50. 300
    Name: Lynn Williams on Nov 18, 2012

    Comments: absolute disgrace, this is an attack on middle class again

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 25 › »