Save Historic UH Campus Tree!

Signatures 729 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 › »

1. 1
   Name: Julie K Kirk on Oct 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Cheryl Phillipson on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Kenneth Gabbert on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments: they should build around the tree not tear it down

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Paddy Gerren on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Kevin Lewis on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments: Am UH Manoa graduate. Save the tree, move the center to the other side of the building.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Jeff Walters on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments: There must be a way to save it. Too many memories.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: B. J. Bouthillier on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments: I am a 1997 graduate of UH. This tree is an anchor. We must save it!

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Mike Barber on Oct 23, 2009

   Comments: The weeping fig is a favorite focal point of beauty on campus. To remove it is irresponsible. As a student, future alum and member of the community I am very disappointed in this decision. Mike Barber

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Zoe Schorr on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Diana Davids on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: As a UH alumna, it is painful to see planners put buildings before the gift of nature. Move the building or move the tree, period.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Joseph Pace on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Find somewhere else for the expansion. Why not renovate the buildings on the other side of the campus center, those buildings by Sinclair (actually, they should include Sinclair) are so outdated Or build around the tree. Adapt!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Deborah Cravatta on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Charles Tracy on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Tree should be saved, Praise Yahweh.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Montez Puletasi on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Judy on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Buildings come and go and can be built anywhere...so why build in the very place where this tree has been for almost a 100 years...trees are a benefit to our health, shades us, cleans the air, and this is a special one that is a reminder of days gone by and of the person who planted it. Auwe to those who want to uproot it for the sake of a building...

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Aushalyn Haia on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Cindy Lance on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: I grew up in Manoa, live close to the campus and have spent many happy hours under this magnificent old tree. Move the building and save the tree...and plant more beautiful green works of art. Restore the campus grounds, which were once lovely, shaded, and weed free.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Please save this tree, it has been standing and providing shade and shelter from the rain for over 90 years.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Nydia Santiago-Cordero on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Joan M. Komatsu on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Mary J. Ackerman on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: save nature, plant cement elsewhere

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Gordon Tyau on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: They should be able to save the tree, like the Art Building did for the Baobab Tree, which is still flourishing.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Suzanne Garrett on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: save the tree..... we need the oxygen.... put the center elsewhere..........

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Marilyn Mick on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: David Sone on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Michael Thomas on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Please preserve the historic UH landscape!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Kate Paine on Oct 23, 2009

    Comments: Known is that projects such as these are in the works for a long time. When it was proposed and brought to this stage, was a different time than now. This money needs to be used more wisely. It is NOT time to build another gymnasium and weight room. To wipe out a 90 yr old tree for this kind of misplaced project is a lose/lose proposition. It needs to be rethought.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 24, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Carol Janezic on Oct 24, 2009

    Comments: You cannot replace this tree once it is gone. I love walking in the comfort of its shade and it is a beautiful form of living history.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Stacey Levine on Oct 26, 2009

    Comments: Go back to the first design (that involved saving the tree)!

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Ethan Levine on Oct 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Dorothy Faison on Oct 27, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Liloa on Oct 29, 2009

    Comments: Save the Trees and get the students outside for some recreation

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Maggi Quinlan, Ph.D. on Oct 30, 2009

    Comments: It is imperative that we stop destroying the natural world so humans can take up more space. The value of this tree is immeasurable, infinite in its age, stature and all the life it sustains. The value of the recreational center is limited, serving only one species; humans. It is hard to imagine that at a school of UH stature there can be no more creative thinking than is being displayed in this project. Surely great minds can find a way to create a Center without destroying this landmark tree. If not, this is a sad statement for the entire University of Hawaii and all who would allow this travesty. PRESERVE THIS TREE!!!!!!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Solomon Champion on Oct 31, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Jason Cantley on Oct 31, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Lauren Kerr on Nov 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Aaron on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Stephen W. Canham, PhD on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments: I am UHM faculty with over 30 years of service. The tree has done nothing wrong, yet it is to be killed for "progress," maybe a video game arcade or coffee shop. No. This is flat out wrong. Save it.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Amy Brinker on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Maryfe Culiat on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments: As a UH Alumni, I majored in Biology and I have learned about the significance of the plants at the University. I believe that the tree should be protected and that plans should be revised to have the Center built around it.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Robert Sullivan on Nov 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 › »