Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 9725 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 195 › »

  1. 1
    Name: Linda Davis on Apr 21, 2005
    State: IN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Phil Burris on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Barbara Fish on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Kim Roland on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: Maybe the Weather Channel is paying him off.You know those free trips all over.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Tony Linney on Apr 21, 2005
    State: KY
    Country:
    Comments: I want this bill defeated.
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Russell Martin on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: The National Weather Service Duties Act of 2005, Senate Bill S.786, is an outrageous attempt by Sen. Santorum to line the pockets of a private company in his state by restricting access to what up until now has been, and by rights should be, freely accessible public information. As a professional meteorologist I strongly oppose this proposed legislation! Russell Martin
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Bruce Faramelli on Apr 21, 2005
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Tommy Thornton on Apr 21, 2005
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: We are a small city with limited budget. We depend on the free data provided from the NWS. There comes a time when the polictical boundaries need to stop and focus on providing as much information as possible to protect property and save lives. DO NOT PASS THIS BILL. Thank You
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Joseph Torsitano on Apr 21, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Troy Kimmel on Apr 21, 2005
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: It's pretty obvious that the honorable Senator Santorum is at the end of the puppet strings of Joel Myers.
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Thomas Abell on Apr 21, 2005
    State: IN
    Country: US
    Comments: This proposed legislation is unfair to the taxpayers.
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Ronald Ciminero on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Gary Shuford on Apr 21, 2005
    State: LA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Ellie Smart on Apr 21, 2005
    State: NE
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Cathy Matuella on Apr 21, 2005
    State: NE
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Leigh Urban on Apr 21, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Catherine Lynn on Apr 22, 2005
    State: NE
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Joseph Mastandrea on Apr 22, 2005
    State: NE
    Country: US
    Comments: Maintain access to NWS products online because we already paid for them with tax dollars. Let the resellers pay for the entire NOAA budget if they want to block public access to weather information.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Tricia Piatt on Apr 22, 2005
    State: NE
    Country: US
    Comments: I am against this bill. It would put too many lives at risk. We get weather reporting now and it works......don't break something that so many people depend on.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Jackie Keesee on Apr 22, 2005
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: I consider this very important especially since we seem determined to poison the environment....
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Alan Charlesworth on Apr 22, 2005
    State: OR
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Laurette Richardson on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Dennis Gabler on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: My taxes pay for the information and sensor systems that the private services also use. We the taxpayers should not lose equal access to this data.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Craig Paul on Apr 22, 2005
    State: KS
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Robert Tarling on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country: UK
    Comments: Sir, I feel that this decision is motivated by $, and greed, and will prove to be a retrograde step. The NWS hasn't been equalled, let alone surpassed by 'commercial' operations. Keep the NWS, and its' data, free to all who need it.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Jeffrey Robinson on Apr 22, 2005
    State: MD
    Country: US
    Comments: I am an avid EMWIN user and weather spotter and do not think that the US Gov't. should GIVE AWAY anything to private weather contractors. The wording should change so that NWS does NOT have to give in to private contractors. FREE should mean just that. FREE. I purchased equipment in my office to receive the EMWIN from the EMWIN coordonator in WALLOPS VA. It is a great benefit and public safety is my number one priority. Thanks you...
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Dennis Sager on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Robert Herman on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Michael Cohen on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: I believe in the great work done by the National Weather Service and I want to know why the Senator from Pennsylvania and Accuweather from Pennsylvania want to destroy a part of Homeland security. We depend on the NWS and so does our military. I would not like to see this in private hands who have their own intentions.
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Christopher Dodson on Apr 22, 2005
    State: KY
    Country: US
    Comments: This bill needs to be defeated. We need more funding and support for the National Weather Service. We do not need groups or companies trying to come up against them. The NWS has saved lives and continues to save lives. Do not pass a bill that will weaken the agency.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: William McCarty on Apr 22, 2005
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Shane Wise on Apr 22, 2005
    State: TN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Michael Bohen on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Jonathan Brazzell on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Harrison Mindlin on Apr 22, 2005
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments: Do not sacrifice the superior services provided by the NWS for the far less accurate and comprehensive services provided to the public by such companies as Accuweather. You will be doing a huge disservice to the public and perhaps even put the citizens that you represent in jeopardy.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: John Giampetro on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Sean Nolan on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Allan Huffman on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Allan Huffman on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Jan Sterling on Apr 22, 2005
    State: NY
    Country:
    Comments: Senator R. Santorum should focus more attention on the mounting deficit rather than the well performing unbiased service that consumes very little of the national budget yet provides, at times, life saving service.
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: John D'Agostino on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Matt Ziebell on Apr 22, 2005
    State: GA
    Country:
    Comments: Privatization of information sourced by the taxpayers is morally wrong.
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Dennis Gulley on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: Please quit meddeling in americans lives and trying to force your views and opinions on everyone so others can make more money!
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Richard Hudson on Apr 22, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Joel Ewing on Apr 22, 2005
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Evan Lowery on Apr 22, 2005
    State: PA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Scott Bachmeier on Apr 22, 2005
    State: WI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Mike Cox on Apr 22, 2005
    State: IA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Jack Belich on Apr 22, 2005
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments: This bill should be known as the AccuWeather Protection Act. It's disgusting to think that our Congress is even considering reducing the critical role played by the National Weather Service. If you want real competition, let AccuWeather and the other commercial providers provide their services WITHOUT using any of the NWS raw data. If this were to happen, then we'd see some real competition--very unlikely the commercial vendors would want to invest in a data collection network--they'd rather use the "free" NWS data. Kill this bill in committee--it doesn't deserve to see the light of day.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Robert Dewey on Apr 22, 2005
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 195 › »

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links