| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 651 | marc hatton | |
| 652 | Stephen Sheehan | It is a good idea to broadcast the Premier League in other countries, as many foreign countries love to watch the power and pace of the league. However, this solution you have in mind is impractical. What i would propose is to have something played in the summer, but instead of it being part of the Premier League, create a cup. If this was a knockout cup with all the teams involved, then wouldnt the countries prefer this over just one premier league game? |
| 653 | Manfredi Zaccaro | |
| 654 | Manfredi Zaccaro | |
| 655 | Zak MAcdonagh | what i joke! keep it english!!!!!! |
| 656 | kerry reed | no to the 39th game! |
| 657 | Craig Martell | |
| 658 | Craig Martell | |
| 659 | Corbin Spicer | |
| 660 | peter | |
| 661 | Adam Ross | The premier league was set up to help the England national team. How does the influx of foreigners and us now playing in foreign countries help our national team? This is a ludicrous idea and I hope the premier league will be boycotted as a result. |
| 662 | Daniel Rushton | Mr Scudamore,
Please consider this fixture for the future:
The Big Black Country Derby (Woves vs. West Brom) played in the Congo....
Or how about this
Chelsea vs. West Ham in Kabul
Will this make enough of your lovely money, you "Money Man"?!!
Stop globalising our game and lining the coffers of the Big Four, they will be the only ones to profit from this idea. Stamp out the "Sky 4" culture, do not encourage it. |
| 663 | Stuart Jackson | How about Hull Vs Stoke in Baghdad, Bolton Vs Fulham in Chernobyl or The Merseyside Derby in Harare ?? The notion of a 39th fixture to be played abroad is ludicrous. It only benefits the MONEY MEN |
| 664 | James Haywood | |
| 665 | Patrick Ebbutt | |