SAVE THE BLUE STAR

Signatures 138 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Lee Boxall on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments: Great idea!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Nathan Sanders on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments: The current proposals are of a poor quality and no connsideration for the fabric of the historic city.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Peter Wilson on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments: As past studies have shown, simply erasing the brewery site simply doesn't work. Although there are obvious tensions between stakeholders to maximise profits in the event of introducing maximum density housing and commercial buildings to the site; the site carries a grain of city history that simply cannot be erased. The 'Blue Star' is a synbol of the city and of the people. York has it's Minster, London has its Tower Bridge. Newcastle has the Blue Star. The existing fabric of the site needs to be retained and modified to keep history upon the site and the city.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Stewart on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Stephen Baty on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: D E Johansen on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Matt Bailey on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Ben Meharry on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: David Moffat on Mar 30, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Nicholas Crawford on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: go on son...

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Jessica Dryden on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Douglas Vernon on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: James Henderson on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Historical attraction which can be incorporated in with the new, thus making it a benificial project to newcastle and the community, Additional with the scarcity of land this will reduce the land usage, and improve the usage of brown field sites

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Louise Taylor on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Preserve the fabric of our industrial history

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Ian Thompson on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Save the history, re-use is better than re-build.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Richard Almond on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Architecture Student, 3rd year, Northumbria Uni

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Alice Holder on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Tony Mason on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Paul Taylor on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: i believe this important part of history and beautiful architecture should be saved.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: ROSE WONG on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: i propose new builds and developments but not when we has to knock down our history! we should use what we have, inside.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Michael Lee on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Martin Robinson on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Sensitive redevelopment = retaining historical & cultural elements. Of all organisations these 3 [Newcastle City Council and Newcastle University and One North East] should have embraced and acted upon this by now. There is no excuse!

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Neil Harris on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Dawn McVeigh on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: The site should be sympathetically refurbished and given the respect it deserves for providing such heritage for the city of newcastle.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Paul Wharton on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Louise Nowell on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Simon Broadbent on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: shame to loose the history, brown ale has played a large amount in the lives of geordies

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Melissa Kent on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Bruce Watson on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Jen Spence on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: I am fully aware that new builds do not pay VAT whereas refurbishment and renovation do. Nevertheless I think that these buildings are an important part of Newcastle's history and I do not want to see them demolished!!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Jen Spence on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: I am fully aware that new builds do not pay VAT whereas refurbishment and renovation do. Nevertheless I think that these buildings are an important part of Newcastle's history and I do not want to see them demolished!!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Ff on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: dgfgg

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Rob Sampson on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Ross Lewis on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Ross Lewis on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Why don't they just use the existing historical buildings, just like the batic flour mill.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Kelly Mounsey on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: I am most definitely against the demolition of the Newcastle Federation Brewery building.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Susanna Jenkins on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Jack Thornton on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Jack Thornton on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Geoff Liddle on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Wilson on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Chris Palmer on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Charles Medlicott on Apr 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3