Save Sussex Education!

Signatures 1044 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 18, 19, 20, 21

1. 1001
   Name: Nelhyoj on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 1002
   Name: Nicola Clewer on Mar 17, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 1003
   Name: Chris Johnson on Mar 18, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 1004
   Name: Andrew Goffey on Mar 19, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 1005
   Name: Chris Roe on Mar 19, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 1006
   Name: Maria C. Aranda Da Silva on Mar 21, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 1007
   Name: Fahmhpmkdy on Mar 22, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 1008
   Name: Umbvty on Mar 22, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 1009
   Name: Fzwiyoc on Mar 22, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 1010
    Name: Whwsyzvsctn on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 1011
    Name: Philip Bickerstaffe on Mar 23, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 1012
    Name: Joanna on Mar 23, 2010

    Comments: If the University was a commercial business the first staff in "the firing line" would be a layer of senior management. Isnt it about time someone took a look at staff members such as Michael Farthing, as I'm positive his salary is disproportionately higher in comparision to other employees. There would be considerable cost saving in the removal of staff like Mr Farthing as opposed to support staff and educators.

    Flag
13. 1013
    Name: Emma Motivala on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 1014
    Name: Jacqui Tapp on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 1015
    Name: Cat Tardif on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 1016
    Name: Katie McCracken on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 1017
    Name: Julia Smith on Mar 29, 2010

    Comments: Outrageous. This is education, Fat Cats out, not valuable staff members essential for efficient running of the university.

    Flag
18. 1018
    Name: Samantha Tucker on Mar 29, 2010

    Comments: When I read that one of the senior members of staff was earning the same as the PM I was truly disgusted, I would like to know how these people can look themselves in the eye!!

    Flag
19. 1019
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 1020
    Name: Ana Catarina Neto Carvalho on Apr 29, 2010

    Comments: There are now 107 members of staff threatened with redundancies. I want the "1" and the "7" to disappear from this figure.

    Flag
21. 1021
    Name: Lucy Pearce on May 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 1022
    Name: Therie Hendrey-Seabrook on May 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 1023
    Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 1024
    Name: Ben Vandersteen on May 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 1025
    Name: Migena Pengili on May 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 1026
    Name: Michael Rosenthal on May 16, 2010

    Comments: Vice-Chancellors perhaps need reminding that the business of universities is education, and that this education is central to the maintaining of civilised values. Most universities have too many over-paid managers, and savings could be made here. So heavy-handed and insensitive an approach to six students risks doing real damage to a University whose reputation as a beacon of enlightened standards is now in tatters.

    Flag
27. 1027
    Name: Alice Mills on May 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 1028
    Name: Andrea Fallas on Jun 4, 2010

    Comments: Sussex is going to sh*t. I came here in 2001 and was proud to be a Sussex student. Now Sussex could rob me of my supervior, and rob him of a job. Shameful. SAVE SUSSEX NOW!

    Flag
29. 1029
    Name: Wendy Russell on Jun 6, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 1030
    Name: Rodrigo Novaes on Jun 6, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 1031
    Name: Kheya Bag on Jun 6, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 1032
    Name: Sam McAuliffe on Jun 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 1033
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 1034
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 1035
    Name: K Stuckey on Jun 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 1036
    Name: Susan Curnock on Jun 14, 2010

    Comments: Please reconsider your management style and work WITH your staff, not against them. Everyone wants the best for the university, so please do not treat the people who work for you as if we were living in Victorian times. Consultation would be preferable to coercion. This is a PR nightmare for the university. I certainly would not choose to start my degree at a university which calls police with dogs to a peaceful student protest. Neither would I wish my son, nor any of my friends' children to attend. It reminds me of the beatings of students at the Vietnam demonstrations in the USA. Is this the kind of image you wish to promote? Because this is certainly what you are doing! Please reconsider your approach to both your staff and your students. I enjoyed my time at Sussex and am extremely angry and upset by the way you are treating your staff and students. Furthermore, whilst I understand that the enormous amount of money you are spending on buildings comes from a different budget, it is clearly irksome to those who face job losses in an uncertain economic climate. The new equipment in the library is slow and impractical - I'm afraid it was poorly thought through and ill-managed. Students have to stand to use the catalogue screens, there is nowhere to place reference sheets while looking up books. The book return is faulty and does not register the books. Surely this money has been wasted and would have been better used to save some much-needed jobs?

    Flag
37. 1037
    Name: Susan Curnock on Jun 14, 2010

    Comments: Please reconsider your management style and work WITH your staff, not against them. Everyone wants the best for the university, so please do not treat the people who work for you as if we were living in Victorian times. Consultation would be preferable to coercion. This is a PR nightmare for the university. I certainly would not choose to start my degree at a university which calls police with dogs to a peaceful student protest. Neither would I wish my son, nor any of my friends' children to attend. It reminds me of the beatings of students at the Vietnam demonstrations in the USA. Is this the kind of image you wish to promote? Because this is certainly what you are doing! Please reconsider your approach to both your staff and your students. I enjoyed my time at Sussex and am extremely angry and upset by the way you are treating your staff and students. Furthermore, whilst I understand that the enormous amount of money you are spending on buildings comes from a different budget, it is clearly irksome to those who face job losses in an uncertain economic climate. The new equipment in the library is slow and impractical - I'm afraid it was poorly thought through and ill-managed. Students have to stand to use the catalogue screens, there is nowhere to place reference sheets while looking up books. The book return is faulty and does not register the books. Surely this money has been wasted and would have been better used to save some much-needed jobs?

    Flag
38. 1038
    Name: Mr Andrew Moir (Unite Member ) on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Stop these cuts Now , our education of our students must be defended and tuition fees must not rise to pay for greedy bankers mistakes

    Flag
39. 1039
    Name: Tammie Cook on Nov 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 1040
    Name: Constantinos Sophocleous on Nov 17, 2010

    Comments: The market vs education.

    Flag
41. 1041
    Name: Ubavxea on Aug 18, 2011

    Comments: HFRCeT <a href="http://inuhgeddngzk.com/">inuhgeddngzk</a>, [url=http://wgzucewmvikp.com/]wgzucewmvikp[/url], [link=http://nqgajhjoodsy.com/]nqgajhjoodsy[/link], http://eboqxmmfqbju.com/

    Flag
42. 1042
    Name: John Bensted on Jan 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 1043
    Name: Microsoft OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: 6Vhg8P Say, you got a nice article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

    Flag
44. 1044
    Name: Buy Cheap OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: OtsK26 Thank you ever so for you article post. Will read on...

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 18, 19, 20, 21