Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 215 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 »

  1. 151
    Name: Walter Claxton on Apr 1, 2010
    Comments: To demolish this superb architectural building will be sacrilege, we have enough Square box buildings in Sheffield, just take a look at Denby Street. Worse than that to take a valuable work space away from the artists and craftsmen is nothing short of criminal, this area is a living working museum and should be kept as such. These (Little Mesters shops) are our heritage, they made Sheffield the thriving City it became. We should not lose this part of our past, it is worth saving these craftsmen and artists to keep alive traditional skills which have largely been lost to mass production.
    Flag
  2. 152
    Name: Beryl Cooke on Apr 2, 2010
    Comments: All our industrial heritage is gradually disappearing. I think that Portland Works should be left for future generations to enjoy.
    Flag
  3. 153
    Name: Beryl Cooke on Apr 2, 2010
    Comments: All our industrial heritage is gradually disappearing. I think that Portland Works should be left for future generations to enjoy.
    Flag
  4. 154
    Name: Brenda Wildgoose on Apr 3, 2010
    Comments: It is a great pity to see the threat of a further decline in skilled manufacturing jobs within the city. Also there is a musical community in the area together with Stag Works on John Street.
    Flag
  5. 155
    Name: Nigel McClements on Apr 7, 2010
    Comments: We need to keep our skills alive and we need to bring back proper aprenticeships so that we can pass on our skills to the next generation and beyond.
    Flag
  6. 156
    Name: Anna Childs on Apr 11, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 157
    Name: Kal Wright on Apr 16, 2010
    Comments: Please don't allow this beautiful old building fall as so many have before, If it has to be flats then restore the building, but if possible leave the building with those businesses that have been there so long.
    Flag
  8. 158
    Name: Roger Barton on Apr 18, 2010
    Comments: Traffic is already congested enough without having another 60 plus cars getting in the way and access will be nigh impossible on match days.
    Flag
  9. 159
    Name: Nicky Watson on Apr 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 160
    Name: Edward Crisp on Apr 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 161
    Name: Jeremy Watson on Apr 25, 2010
    Comments: Parts of the city like this need to be saved, flats and offices, who really needs these, there are hundreds of empty ones around the city
    Flag
  12. 162
    Name: Robert Watson on Apr 28, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 163
    Name: Dr Chris Cumberpatch on Apr 28, 2010
    Comments: Haven't we learned anything from the planning disasters of the last ten years? Isn't the city already well supplied with blocks of flats, many of which seem to be empty?
    Flag
  14. 164
    Name: Rebecca Hughes on Apr 29, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 165
    Name: Ellie on May 3, 2010
    Comments: Why do developement people realise that listed buildings are a part of sheffield's heritage, and unless they want to completly destroy the character of this wonderful city, they should leave well alone. If somethings not broken, why fix it?!
    Flag
  16. 166
    Name: Hannah Obee on May 5, 2010
    Comments: Please do not lose this significant slice of Sheffield history for so little gain. Encourage local industry and join the resurgence of interest and skills in metalwork of which the city is rightly proud.
    Flag
  17. 167
    Name: Jim Monach on May 6, 2010
    Comments: important piece of Sheffield's history - and a living, working building which it is important to preserve.
    Flag
  18. 168
    Name: Anita Wilson on May 6, 2010
    Comments: Why, do we do this?
    Flag
  19. 169
    Name: Catharine Wilson on May 6, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 170
    Name: Jane Monach on May 6, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 171
    Name: Anthony Bennett on May 7, 2010
    Comments: Small, affordable, workshops are essential for the future of creativity and industry. Sheffield has lost so many workspaces, without provision to replace them. This has led to a downturn in creative output. Not so good for our bid to become the City of Culture for 2013.
    Flag
  22. 172
    Name: Nick Warren on May 7, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 173
    Name: Joyce Bullivant on May 9, 2010
    Comments: this is part of sheffields heritage. Heritage isn't just about buildings its about people.
    Flag
  24. 174
    Name: Robert Smith on May 10, 2010
    Comments: As a recent resident of the Portland works I want to register my complaint that I may now be shut down. 1 years work has gone into building, from the ground up, my studio, and this building is the only place I can afford to rent within my budget.
    Flag
  25. 175
    Name: Robert Smith on May 10, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 176
    Name: Daniel Wilde on May 10, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 177
    Name: Jane Warren on May 10, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 178
    Name: Jon P Baker on May 10, 2010
    Comments: The buildings contained within Portland Works now represent the sole surviving little mesters, supported by artists and others who also have residency there. As such it is far too important as a surviving institution of what made Sheffield what it is today, to be allowed to die. Moreover, opportunities exist to convert the buildings into a thriving hub with an existing financial and economic base, rather than a tentative/speculative venture at a time of depressed markets.
    Flag
  29. 179
    Name: Trevor Williams on May 12, 2010
    Comments: I hope we are not going to allow yet another piece of our history and heritage fall to the Town Hall hierarchy. There has far too many buildings lost over the past 30 or 40 years all ready. We must all speak out before it is too late. Good Luck!
    Flag
  30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on May 12, 2010
    Comments: I hope we are not going to allow yet another piece of our history and heritage fall to the Town Hall hierarchy. There has far too many buildings lost over the past 30 or 40 years all ready. We must all speak out before it is too late. Good Luck!
    Flag
  31. 181
    Name: Mike Coop on May 15, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 182
    Name: Carol Simpson on May 19, 2010
    Comments: Ive already sent my comments
    Flag
  33. 183
    Name: Heather Mikhail on May 19, 2010
    Comments: Why lose these wonderful sounding small businesses just for flats?
    Flag
  34. 184
    Name: Seraphina Ball on May 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 185
    Name: Stephen Selby on May 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 186
    Name: Maggie Le Mare on May 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 187
    Name: Jim Fulton on May 19, 2010
    Comments: Why on earth do we need more flats? The City is full of empty / unlettable / unsaleable flats and offices. We don't need more flats, we need to retain our heritage and Portland Works is a living, working example. Not a living museum, an ongoing collection of businesses that have "lived" and worked together for years.
    Flag
  38. 188
    Name: Richard Matthews on May 19, 2010
    Comments: Cities like Sheffield don't need more flats and offices; they need to preserve their heritage and give spaces for employment for skilled craftsmen. We can't all work in call centres, so leave the Works alone.
    Flag
  39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on May 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 190
    Name: Ben Melton on May 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 191
    Name: Liz Marshall on May 19, 2010
    Comments: Portland Works represents Sheffield's distinctive character and its industrial heritage. Once destroyed a piece of our history will be gone forever. Sheffield is already awash with apartments and offices. I fully support the campaign to save Portland Works from redevelopment.
    Flag
  42. 192
    Name: Norman Fletcher on May 19, 2010
    Comments: These buildings are a part of the industrial heritage of Sheffield. They should continue to be used for small industry and as arts studios. Sheffield has enough apartments and offices already. This is the wrong area for that type of development.
    Flag
  43. 193
    Name: Jackie Fletcher on May 19, 2010
    Comments: I just listened to the item on Radio 4 about the proposed redevelopment. It is a ludicrous idea, we don't need any more apartments; I have seen offices to let RENT FREE in Sheffield city centre. Let us hope that good sense prevails for once. Good luck in your quest to keep your essential working skills and the traditions of this Steel city alive.
    Flag
  44. 194
    Name: Amanda Chuter on May 19, 2010
    Comments: As a regular visitor to Sheffield, it is its industrial heritage that encourages me to stay longer than I need. As a result, I book 2 hotel nights, use small independent restaurants, and visit the numerous small traditional shopping areas to enable me to explore the museums, galleries, canal, and places like Portland Place. Sheffield has planty of apartments, flats, offices - many empty awaiting tenants/buyers - just like hundreds of other cities and towns, but what makes Sheffield different is that it still has viable small businesses. These businesses, such as those at Portlland must be allowed to flourish, not just as heritage, but because these businesses make things that people buy, products that made Sheffield what it must be today: a dynamic city where people live, play and work. long live Portland Works as a place of industry. Resident of Somerset
    Flag
  45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on May 19, 2010
    Comments: I support this objection in that there are many offices already empty in Sheffield and also I feel strongly that peoples livelyhoods should be protected
    Flag
  46. 196
    Name: Mr J Brearley on Oct 14, 2010
    Comments: Save Portland Works
    Flag
  47. 197
    Name: G Hughes on Oct 14, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 198
    Name: Sverre Hasvold on Oct 14, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 199
    Name: ASHLEY PONT on Oct 14, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 200
    Name: John Nicholson on Oct 14, 2010
    Comments: Jobs and preserving some of Sheffields fine manufacturing history should take priority over a quick buck for a developer.
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 »

Sponsored links