Save the Trees in Downtown Santa Monica!

Signatures 568 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »

1. 151
   Name: Jerry Mosher on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Harry Rose on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Suda Miller on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Dawn Miller on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Charles Fredricks on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Trisha on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Tina McKenzie on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Dee Cappelli on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments: I live in Santa Monica and am very much against the City Council's decision regarding the trees. We need the trees and their shade. Why not set aside the money to replace the ficus trees with ginkgo trees only when they're damaged or irreversibly diseased It's a horrible waste of tax payer's money.

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Ali on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Danna Cope on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments: Other cities have mowed down their beautiful, shade-providing trees in the name of progress, only to realize, all too late, that the trees were an integral part of the city-scape and were what made the area attractive to residents and visitors.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Victoria Gillispie on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments: SAVE THE TREES OR ELSE!

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Barbara Casey on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Geoff Shackelford on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments: Please reconsider this move. The trees add beauty to the area.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Jacqueline Jarnagin on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Vicky on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Marisa Kuizenga on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Ellen Farbstein on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Dona Van Bloemen on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Lynn Hoshizaki on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments: I see people, in their ignorance, throw trash on the street from their cars almost every day. Throwing away these trees will have the same negative effect on our environment. Please keep them!!!

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Bethany Cerrona on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Thomas Chesney on Sep 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Jessica Tuck on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: NO NO NO NO NO. IT'S crazy to cut these trees down.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Tabitha Monsalud on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Annie Barnes on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: Santa Monica is a progressive model in so many ways -- taking out these mature trees would be a black mark on an overall inspirational reputation.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Robert Kosef on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Kathleen Roche on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: Not only is the removal crazy, but the cost per tree for removal--$600,000 divided by 50 trees or $12,000 per tree--boggles the mind.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Elizabeth Georges Paymer on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Elizabeth Georges Paymer on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: Saving the ficus at 18th and Michigan was definitely a step in the right direction. We need more creative solutions like this one! Thank you.

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Matheos on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Veronica Krestow on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Bridget Kean on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Alessandra Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Kelly Payfer on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Gene Burke on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: THIS IS THE 2ND WORST DECISION THIS COUNCIL MAJORITY HAS MADE SINCE 2001.

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Marisa Bodell on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Malia Lewis on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Ania Krawiec on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: I guess this constitutes environmental hypocrisy. Santa Monica claiming to be so "environmental". I guess cutting down trees for the "greater" public is there way of doing so. Oh...... the irony.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Nav Jiwan Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: NANCY CHAPELLIER on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Gurupurkh K Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: Don't cut them!!!

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Priscilla La Drew on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: I grew up in Culver City, Santa Monica, and Boyle Heights, when are you people going to learn the best way to save L.A. and keep her beautiful is to preserve not destroy!

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Livtar Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Amrit Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: Please don't cut the trees down. $600,000 could be better spent somewhere else! SAVE THE TREES!! GLOBAL WARMING!!

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Joe Weinstein on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: PLEASE use the $600,000 for education and children....be conscious about your funds. Thank you.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Siri Deva Khalsa on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: don't chop down the trees, please.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »