Signatures 179 total
-
1
Name: Astoria Ridley on Jan 14, 2010Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Robert D. Farwell, on Jan 14, 2010Comments: As Director of the Otis Library of Norwich, I hope you will reconsider your decision to remove this invaluable resource from Norwich.Flag
-
3
Name: Margaret MacDonald on Jan 14, 2010Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Jonathan C. Stock on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Christina DeLucia on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Ratiya Collins on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Wendy L. Fontaine on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Marjorie Lander on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Louise C. Tucker on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Lori Lantos on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: F.Jerome O'Malley on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Kerin Woods on Jan 15, 2010Comments: Please keep the library open for both attorneys and fro pro se litigants.Flag
-
14
Name: Mark Block on Jan 15, 2010Comments: I support the petition to maintain the Norwich library.Flag
-
15
Name: John M. Newson, Esq. on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Jeffrey F Buebendorf on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Darcy Kirk on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Christopher C. Frayer on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Laura B. Seder on Jan 15, 2010Comments: The Norwich Superior Court Library and staff have been a wonderful resource and will be sorely missed if the closure goes through.Flag
-
20
Name: Leeland Cole-Chu on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Kathleen McNamara on Jan 15, 2010Comments: The Norwich law library is a great asset to the legal community and to those who cannot afford their own legal counsel. The loss of the Norwich Court house law library will effect those who have the least. Please find a way to keep the law library.Flag
-
22
Name: Elizabeth Sabilia on Jan 15, 2010Comments: Many of our clients are suffering the same budgetary constraints in their households and businesses due to the retraction of the economy that the judicial department is attempting to address. The southeastern region of the state will likely to see ongoing job losses due to layoffs and restructuring at the major casinos, EB, and Pfizer. Unfortunately, this firm is not as able as it once was to help those in need on a pro bono basis and often directs those in need of help to the law libraries. Again, "[c]losure of this library will have a serious negative impact on pro se litigants who rely on the law library to gain access to legal materials they need to defend themselves in court. These already disenfranchised individuals often lack transportation options to travel to a distant law library."Flag
-
23
Name: Michael E. Jewell on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Jane Cable on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Steve Mirsky on Jan 15, 2010Comments: Closing this library will compromise effective justice for pro se litigants. This is a penny-wise, pound foolish budget cut.Flag
-
27
Name: Jonathan Lane on Jan 15, 2010Comments: As a newly licensed attorney the law libraries are an invaluable tool, the loss of which would impact not only myself but also the clients I represent. I understand the need for budget cutbacks but any benefit gained by cutting the Norwich Law Library would be greatly outweighed by the burden it would impose on both local attorneys and pro se litigants.Flag
-
28
Name: Frank N. Eppinger on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Salvatore Ritacco, Esq. on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Conrad Ost Seifert on Jan 15, 2010Comments: These law libraries serve a crucial need, especially for impoverished people trying to represent themselves pro se. It is the Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association's position that the closing of court houses and court libaries has negative impact on the administration of justice and disproportionately so on indigent citizens. Sincerely, Conrad Ost Seifert, President, Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers AssociationFlag
-
31
Name: Linda J Kidder on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: David M Fabricant on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Sarah Moriarty on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Dana M. Horton on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Rita Provatas on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Kevin D. Wickless on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Nancy M. O'Neil on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Donald R. Beebe on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Daniel A. Beebe on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Barbara J. Bentley on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Daniel Beebe, Esq. on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Donald Beebe, Esq. on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Nancy O'Neil, Esq. on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Sandra C. Farwell on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Bethany Haslam on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Donna R. Skaats on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Patrick Tracy on Jan 15, 2010Comments:Flag