save kyogle heritage

Signatures 75 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Damien Paull on Jul 20, 2008

   Comments: Save our beautiful Art Deco shopfronts.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Janet Wilson on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments: The streetscape of the town is a major resource for improving economic development outcomes for small retailers and tourism operators.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Lynette Zito on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Eric Kaiser on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments: It is not difficult to save some heritage, in this case only a facade - it just costs a few more dollars. That is why developers and those who contract them rarely do it. Kyogle Council has failed this community by ignoring an important heritage study. Vote CEG

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments: Our beautiful old buildings need to be kept. Think of all the "old" buildings in our world that give historical significance, interest and individuality. It is another tourist attraction!

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Lisa Audus on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Tracy James on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Dallas Nock on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments: The character of Kyogle should be maintained. Make no mistake, the character of a town is extremely important, it what attracts visitors, and keeps locals. Lose it and it becomes what has happened to so many dying towns across Australia, they decline in population as soon as the pride people have in their town is gone.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Louise Cornwall on Jul 21, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Mason Dean on Jul 21, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Debra Cole on Jul 21, 2008

    Comments: Heritage sites like this add character & soul to a town and community. These qualities enhance the tourism values and potential of Kyolgle for all.To disregard these value is social vandalism, of the most ignorant kind.Dont ruin this piece of social history that enhances the aesethetic appeal of Kyogle!

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Debra Cole on Jul 21, 2008

    Comments: Heritage sites like this add character & soul to a town and community. These qualities enhance the tourism values and potential of Kyolgle for all.To disregard these value is social vandalism, of the most ignorant kind.Dont ruin this piece of social history that enhances the aesethetic appeal of Kyogle!

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Melitta Firth on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Please save the historic buildings, these buildings give Kyogle charm, and stop the town from becoming a cultural wasteland that looks the same as every other town

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Justine Missen on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Melia Naughton on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: This building is beautiful. How disastrous if we have to describe this stunning example of art deco architecture to our children. "There once was a lovely building here but due to ridiculous reasons, we replaced it with a modern supermarket." How disgraceful. How disappointing. Let it not get to this. Let's hold on to our local heritage.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Amalfi Rose on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Heritage most certainly cannot be replaced.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Vickie Williamson on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Thanks to those who are driving this petition. It's vital that the community speak up about the things it values. The people should be able to decide what they want their town to look like, not a developer!

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Save the heritage of this little country town.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Joan Kelly on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Catherine Lane on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: This is deplorable. Where is the vision

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Kirsty Andrew on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Jimmy Malecki on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Heritage should not be destroyed to allow cookie cutter development. Any consideration for this property should be to maintain the Art Deco and character of the village.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Wendy Rolls on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments: Heritage cannot be replaced. Use some imagination and creativity to incorporate these features into supermarket complex.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Lina Eve on Jul 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Brenda Cameron on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments: Would be a shame to see these buildings destroyed because the Council has not done the right thing by Kyogle Heritage listings. also check whats happening to the old Kyogle Hospital.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Judi-Ann & Mark on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments: Please save these shops as they have been there for as long as i can remember thanxz Judi-Ann

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Madeleine Smith on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Madeleine Smith on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Jo Kijas on Jul 23, 2008

    Comments: Historic buildings such as this lovely example make Kyogle a great place to visit for local North Coast tourists like myself. It should be seen as the asset it is for the supermarket - not an impediment.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Robert Wirth on Jul 24, 2008

    Comments: This building must be saved! Kyogle is a small country town – buildings of this calibre prove that Kyogle was once an important town in our region. Kyogle has a history, it's unique and is best expressed in it's historic architecture! It's criminal to destroy this building.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Robert Wirth on Jul 24, 2008

    Comments: This building must be saved! Kyogle is a small country town – buildings of this calibre prove that Kyogle was once an important town in our region. Kyogle has a history, it's unique and is best expressed in it's historic architecture! It's criminal to destroy this building.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Johanna Kempff on Jul 24, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Stephanie Alt on Jul 24, 2008

    Comments: As a former resident of Kyogle I know how important all the art deco buildings are in giving the main street a wonderful, distinctive character. If council allows this to be whittled away for spurious reasons that are not true impediments to the function required they are doing the future of kyogle town and it's people a great disservice.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 24, 2008

    Comments: IGA have a reputation for being a little more conscientious than the other large chains. This could be an opportunity for them to enhance their marketing by claiming rapport with their customers.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Jackie Luethi on Jul 25, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Daniel O'Sullivan on Jul 25, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 25, 2008

    Comments: Lead is one of the most inert metals around, just goes to show Ernie Bennett needs to find a new fact finder, or possibly an independent mind. Hows about IGA stocking local food also

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Andrew J Paull on Jul 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 28, 2008

    Comments: A pathetic short sighted decision by an local council that has lost its way.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 29, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: D.Lamberton on Jul 29, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Lea Barnett on Jul 30, 2008

    Comments: As a Sydney visitor to your region i value the unique architecture and culture that country towns bring. Victoria is leading Australia in it's acknowledgement of Architectural Heritage and it is about time NSW came up to standard. Your community will benefit greatly from a well designed integrated Business that puts back into the community without ripping out the history, yes that is correct, just like they do in Europe!

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Roland Faber on Jul 30, 2008

    Comments: Under NO circumstance may these building's facades be destroyed as they are truly amongst the most beautiful and definitely the most unique and characteristic facades of Kyogle's main street.. One only has to look at the present Ritchie's IGA shopfront to realise their complete and utter disrespect for the town's asthetics. Their proposal to demolish the existing building's facades at their new site and the facade they wish to replace it with emphasises their continued disrepect towards Kyogles architectural heritage and charm.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Christine Regan on Jul 30, 2008

    Comments: I feel extremely disappointed with the decision of Kyogle Council and find it hard to believe that people of such standing could be so shortsighted. One only has to look down the main street of Kyogle to become aware that the ugliest building is currently occupied by IGA. Is this what is going to replace these beautiful buildings that sould be saved not just for us but for our future generations.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Christine Regan on Jul 30, 2008

    Comments: I feel extremely disappointed with the decision of Kyogle Council and find it hard to believe that people of such standing could be so shortsighted. One only has to look down the main street of Kyogle to become aware that the ugliest building is currently occupied by IGA. Is this what is going to replace these beautiful buildings that sould be saved not just for us but for our future generations.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2008

    Comments: Absolutely disgraceful that these buildings are to be demolished. Kyogle is very fast loosing it's character.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Judith Ridding on Aug 1, 2008

    Comments: We are losing too many of these buildings to greedy developers. Take a leaf out of some developers and build around the existing facade and building. Would make a great coffe shop/cafe with those beautiful windows to let in the light.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Sue Elliott on Aug 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2