| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 151 | David Smith | |
| 152 | Rachel Mills | |
| 153 | Miriam Brodersen | |
| 154 | Elizabeth Sappenfield | The Morehead Hill Historic District Preservation Plan says that designation of this local historic district was intended to "to preserve the architectural integrity and cultural significance of one of Durham’s most important historical assets." The community has come together to recognize the value of these houses as part of the fabric of the neighborhood and to recognize that fabric as a cultural and economic asset for the city. |
| 155 | Shelisa Howard-Martinez | |
| 156 | Joey Zielazinski | |
| 157 | Henry Sappenfield | |
| 158 | Mark Lee | |
| 159 | Mike Brown | Healthy Start, while performing a needed service, has chosen not to act as a partner with its surrounding neighborhood. This action to demolish the 2 homes in an historic district is disappointing to those of us who wished to work with HS in furthering its goals while preserving a safe and rebuilding neighborhood environment.
I am against the demolishment of these homes. |
| 160 | Liz Wing | |
| 161 | Jennifer Skahen | While I support building playgrounds, the current demolition plan is not attached to a specific building permit/land use permit. I cannot support demolition without plans. |
| 162 | Sandy Demeree |
| 163 | Clarrisa Grady |
| 164 | Donna Monroe | |
| 165 | Christina Blackburn | |
| 166 | Anonymous | |
| 167 | J Kase | I encourage that an alternative solution be found instead of destroying history. |
| 168 | Anonymous | It is important to me and durham that we retain the character and nature of this historic neighborhood that so well reflects the diversity and character of DUrham |
| 169 | Ethel Simonetti | What is razed cannot be resurrected. We need 365 more days to create a viable purpose for the 804 and 806 Jackson ST properties. With lot sizes so small in our inner city community, what occurs on one lot affects us all. If granted, we promise to use the year extension to brainstorm together for the best use of these pivotal properties. |
| 170 | Anonymous |
| 171 | Anonymous | Healthy Start needs to be a part of the community,
Healthy Start milks Durham, they do not serve it. |
| 172 | kathleen martin | |
| 173 | Maureen Kurtz | |
| 174 | Anonymous | It would be a shame to demolish these houses and would not contribute a thing to the fabric of the neighborhood. |
| 175 | Deborah Pearce | Historic buildings in historic neighborhoods should not be torn down willy nilly, especially when Durham is priding itself on its rich architectural history.. |
| 176 | Christina Fish | |
| 177 | Christina Fish | |
| 178 | Jon Fish | |
| 179 | kathy rudy | |
| 180 | Anonymous | I support the Healthy Start academy, but I think it would be a tragedy to tear down these homes, and this is an opportunity for the academy to engage in dialogue with the neighborhood, which it has thus far avoided. |
| 181 | Anita Moloney | |
| 182 | Lisl Hampton | |
| 183 | Anonymous | Thse homes are valuable in maintaining the historic value of our neighborhood and should be preserved. There are many better community-minded uses for these properties than to destroy them. |
| 184 | Anonymous | Thse homes are valuable in maintaining the historic value of our neighborhood and should be preserved. There are many better community-minded uses for these properties than to destroy them. |
| 185 | Tim Stallmann | |
| 186 | Keval Kaur Khalsa | |
| 187 | Anonymous | Preserve what is there and find another space for the playground. |