Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 331 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 »

  1. 101
    Name: Bryan L. Boulier on Mar 5, 2010
    State: Virginia
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: William G. Barron Jr. on Mar 5, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments: The BLS, along with other major organizations in the Department of Labor, employs many dedicated civil servants who work very hard in their jobs and make every effort to protect and serve the public, especially individual citizens who need assistance. These Department of Labor efforts have been, and continue to be, severely underfunded . In the current economic environment, the long term underfunding of Labor Department programs that address the needs of workers should be a priority for any administration that cares about working people and their welfare. Providing individuals with basic information and assistance in understanding, maintaining and better securing their economic welfare, and protecting fundamental rights under public law for such basic rights as equal employment opportunity, fair wages, pension and benefit security including health care protection are far more important priorities than funding cost overruns and ineptitude in programs outside of the Department of Labor. Even in the relatively small federal statistical budget, there are programs and activities in agencies outside of the DOL and BLS that are gross examples of waste and mismanagement, and many others that are activities or functions performed poorly or of far lower priority than the DOL and BLS work described above. One quick look at Inspector General and GAO reports, and Congressional hearing transcripts reveals that this waste is hardly a secret. Viewed against the facts, the OMB comment in the Washington Post about priorities for BLS and DOL programs is not just misleading, it is also an insult, not just to the hard working civil servants at the Department of Labor and BLS, but, more importantly, to the hard working citizens and taxpayers that the DOL is trying to serve.
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Markley Roberts on Mar 6, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments: My duties during my 33 years at the AFL-CIO included serving for many years as chair of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Labor Research Advisory Council and also as chair of the BLS Council's Committee on Productivity and Foreign Labor Statistics (now renamed “international labor comparisons”). International labor statistics have always been of key interest to labor unions on at least two counts ... one as a matter of social welfare comparison and even more important as a basis for comparison of international wage levels and international labor cost comparisons. These comparisons are important in general and particularly important to unions affected by trade, exports and imports. Therefore I am particularly concerned by learning that the Obama Administration's proposed 2011 Labor Dept budget has zeroed-out $2 million for the Bureau of Labor Statistics Division of International Labor Comparisons. This will be a serious injury to the unions that use these labor statistics. This BLS office has already taken budget cuts in recent years but it is extraordinarily shortsighted -- even crazy and nonsensical. I know that the ILO, International Labor Organization, occasionally but not regularly publishes some international labor statistics ... but what the ILO does is based very largely on techniques, data, and leadership provided by the BLS international labor comparisons office.
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Linda Oppenheim on Mar 6, 2010
    State: New Jersey
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: Economic development requires reliable data. This program is crucial for efforts to America's economic progress.
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Alvin Goldman on Mar 6, 2010
    State: Kentucky
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Tito Boeri on Mar 6, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Timothy Smeeding on Mar 7, 2010
    State: Wisconsin
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Gary Martin on Mar 7, 2010
    State: Virginia
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Lori Kletzer on Mar 7, 2010
    State: California
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Caren Bakkum on Mar 7, 2010
    State: North Carolina
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments: This agency provides valuable information, essential to the well being of our national and international intelligence.
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Robert Lawrence on Mar 8, 2010
    State: Massachusetts
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: Susan Vroman on Mar 9, 2010
    State: District of Columbia
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Jim Albrecht on Mar 9, 2010
    State: District of Columbia
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Jessica Boccardo on Mar 9, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Judy Ancel on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Missouri
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: Such a cut will undermine my teaching and research. Is this just another way of making the U.S. less competitive by ignoring what goes on elsewhere?
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Missouri
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Abigail Carlton on Mar 9, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Frederic S. Lee on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Missouri
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Peter Nadash on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Virginia
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Eric Downey on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Alaska
    Affiliation: Business
    Comments: Sound comparative data is the foundation for improving America's global competitiveness. This data will create family wage jobs in the U.S.
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Hunter N. Moorman on Mar 9, 2010
    State: Virginia
    Affiliation: Government
    Comments: The elimination of the BLS International Labor Comparisons Program will deprive policymakers and academicians of a proven, valuable tool that produces large benefits at a small cost. This program promises to provide useful outcomes for years to come, but once eliminated, essential data and expertise will have been lost and it will not be possible to recoup or renew them. In light of the increasingly globalized context of the US economy and the growing importance of many developing countries and emerging super-economies, elimination of this program would be a particularly unfortunate and short-sighted action. Thank you.
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: David Kuehn on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Georgia
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: David Anderson on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Colorado
    Affiliation: Business
    Comments: BLS data on international labor is an essential tool.
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: GERALD CALL on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Illinois
    Affiliation: Business
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Josh Bivens on Mar 10, 2010
    State: District of Columbia
    Affiliation: Institute
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: June Zaccone on Mar 10, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: A small saving for government spending at enormous cost to researchers.
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Marvin Lee on Mar 10, 2010
    State: California
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: Preserve a valuable access to economic and social comparisons.
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Virginia
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: It does help academic research. And it is very important to know what is happening in Asian countries in such an globalization times.
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Rosalind Boyd on Mar 10, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Gerald Leslie on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Texas
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: William D. Dean on Mar 10, 2010
    State: Colorado
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Christopher Niedt on Mar 11, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: David Schlein on Mar 11, 2010
    State: District of Columbia
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Stephen E. Baldwin on Mar 11, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Business
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: John J Price on Mar 11, 2010
    State: Ohio
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments: These reports are priceless not only to keep track of and show how productive the American workers is compared to other countries but even domestically. Employers who do not collectively bargain a labor agreement in good faith with their employees should be exposed when and where they take advantage of these workers. For Employers who do honest business and want to treat their employees with dignity and respect have the opportunity throught these reports to see what the rate of pay and benefits are in the Industry.
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Patrick J. Devitt on Mar 11, 2010
    State: Wisconsin
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Mary Dean on Mar 11, 2010
    State: Illinois
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Michael Havlovic on Mar 11, 2010
    State: South Dakota
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Holly Sklar on Mar 11, 2010
    State: Massachusetts
    Affiliation: Institute
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: John Lazar on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Pennsylvania
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Abigail Clark on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Michigan
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Dr. Bernard E .Anderson on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Pennsylvania
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: Eliminating the international labor comparisons data is a false and short-sighted way to trim the BLS budget. As a participant in OECD, the U.S. has an obligation to maintain data sources that promote Western nation economic policy collaboration.
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Carol Woehrer on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Minnesota
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments: Comparison of U.S. wages and productivity to those abroad is essential for understanding our economy and planning for the success of U.S. workers.
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Elizabeth Capelle on Mar 12, 2010
    State: New York
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: J. Moy on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Maryland
    Affiliation: Private Citizen
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Daniel Sidorick on Mar 12, 2010
    State: New Jersey
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Art Montminy on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Massachusetts
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Amy Bromsen on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Michigan
    Affiliation: Academia
    Comments: I am in the PhD program at Wayne State. I have used the statistics compiled by the International Labor Comparisons Program of the Bureau of Labor Statistics extensively in my work. In addition, their work is critical for my dissertaiton.
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: James Condran on Mar 12, 2010
    State: Pennsylvania
    Affiliation: Labor
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 »

Sponsored links