Save Our Oak! Save Henhayes!

Signatures 324 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 7 › »

1. 1
   Name: Ben Hartshorn on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments: I live and work in Crewkerne - save the oak, save our open green spaces!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Rebecca Vaughan on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Emily Lynch on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Pauline Hartshorn on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments: It is a magnificent tree which could probably be treated to successfully conserve it. An attempt should be made to do so.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments: you can never replace the history that that tree holds, it is so precious and so much part of England and all the good things it stands for..there must be other ways to improve the ammenities without destroying an ammenity everyone already has....a tree cannot be cut down if it is an ammenity and this tree certainly is providing a glorious aspect for all those looking across the grounds and all those using the grounds. Please locate the sports pavillion somewhere else..........

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Tim Andrewes on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: N Watkins on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments: We all hope that the tree is saved.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Louise Brazier on Apr 26, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Louise Brazier on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Nick Wilson on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anne Hyde on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: The council need to look at alternatives to felling this 200 year old tree.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Annehyde on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Thomas Riggs on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Wendy Harwood on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Robin Harwood on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Nathan Hartshorn on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Katy Limmer on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Helen Tuma on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: I sign for the petition because I can not find any reason why a tree which grows about 200 years should be in the way for any idea of an building which will last only few. There are always alternatives.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Charlotte Revely on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: This is a beautiful tree that could be saved or at least have its life prolonged with dignity should the Council choose. It also takes up water to prevent flood damage, provides cover for wild birds, bats and insects and helps to manage our carbon emissions. Please change the plans to allow the tree some breathing space to recover and listen to the people of Crewkerne.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Ben Trinkle on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Marcus Barrett on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: I support points 1&4 of this petition. I cannot yet put my name to points 2 or 3 for the following reasons: a) I think the planning process is the place for debate as to location of the new pavilion taking into account the views of those living adjacent the site - I do not live near this application site myself. b) the application, to the best of my knowledge, actually made provision for the Lucombe Oak tree within the design. Any disease the tree may have is incidental to this application. c) I believe there may be practical constraints on locating the pavilion on the site of the exisiting sports club and I would like further info on these problems before making up my own mind. d) Further info is still required as to the cost and practicability of saving and improving the health of our 200 yr-old Lucombe Oak - that is why we need a stay of execution to obtain these facts.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Roy Howells on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: John Davidson OBE on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: I feel strongly that trees of this significance should be kept unless there is a proven risk to pubic safety as certified by at least 3 tree specilaists

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Matt Day on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Joanna Crowson on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Lauren Clarke on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: Save Our Oak!!

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Emma Burnard on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: SAVE OUR OAK!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Fiona Day on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Honor on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Cleo Whybrow on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Chris Turnbull on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: I was under the understanding that BROWN-FIELD development was all the rage in politics these days, so RE-DEVELOP the existing site.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Julia Mear on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Dorte Lucas on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Jonathan Davies on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: This tree NEEDS to be saved it is an absolutley beautiful asset to the town.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Alison Davies on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Kerianne Davies on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Kate Noble on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Kirsti Norris on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anna Lucas on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: Open space in Crewkerne is valuable and a tree is a thing of beauty whether healthy or not.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Lynne Richmond on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Roland Widmer on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Martin Bailey on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: From tiny acorns mighty oaks grow, not including Crewkerne Town Council

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Julie Hambleton on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: Our beautiful Lucombe Oak should not be destroyed. There are other, far better locations where the new building could be located.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Ricky Knight on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments: I wholeheartedly support this campaign to prevent the felling of this historic Devon oak.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Lee Patterson on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Darlene Ferguson on Apr 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 7 › »