Save the Crum & Forster Building!

Signatures 2465 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 50 › »

1. 151
   Name: H. Anne Blakely Sciarrone, AIA on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Kate Tans on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Lianne Epstein on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Lianne Epstein on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

   Comments: Please save this valuable part of our culture.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Ruth Dusseault on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

   Comments: Save Crum & Forester

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Payal Ddesai on May 20, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Susan on May 20, 2008

   Comments: Save the building for Pete's sake! Why does everything in Atlanta have to be destroyed in the name of "progress" This is a valuable building of historical significance!

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Stephanie Lu on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Sonny Howard on May 20, 2008

    Comments: As a Georgia Tech graduate, I strongly encourage the Foubdation to save this building.

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Christopher Hernstrom on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Matthew McNicholas on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Anne Moore Colgin on May 20, 2008

    Comments: Ga Tech recerntly began a Masters in Classical Architecture with Dr. Elizabeth ( Betty) Dowling as the head. Maybe she can help!!! Anne

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments: I do hope that Georgia Tech will apply some common sense in this situation. Certainly with all their engeneering knowlege and creative apptitude they would be able to design and install street lights that do not require the destruction of a building which represents a significant piece of their own heritage. Doing so would be an insult to the very people who founded Ga. Tech. in the first place. City of Atlanta will adjust a sidewalk rather than tear down an old oak tree. Certainly this building is worth more than an old oak tree.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Victor Deupi on May 20, 2008

    Comments: When the greening of an American city comes at the expense of its classical heritage, then no one wins. The demolition of Penn Station in New York City triggered the rise of the modern American Preservation movement to avoid such disastrous occurrences from ever happening again. I trust that the good people of Atlanta understand this intuitively. Victor Deupi, PhD Arthur Ross Director of Education Institute of Classical Architecture & Classical America

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Robert Smith on May 20, 2008

    Comments: Georgia Tech BS Arch '06

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Mary Boyd on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Robert Hale on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: David Pearson on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Bulent Baydar on May 20, 2008

    Comments: It would be rediculous to tear down ANY of the FEW buildings left in this city that have any historic significance, especially one as elegant as this one!

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Angie Janesheski on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Alex Holmes on May 20, 2008

    Comments: Please dont destroy this building!

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Heather Brown on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Virginia Ramirez on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Chrystal Butts on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Mariam Mojdehi on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: William H Caldwell on May 20, 2008

    Comments: Atlanta has already lost too many buildings of significant history and character. Let's not lose any more of Atlanta's architectural heritage.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Sarah on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Traci Clark on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Jackie Horlbeck on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Steven L. Markey on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Jeffrey Rollins on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Tiffany Savage on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Scott Thompson on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Holly Tracy on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Diana Welling on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Gisela Schmidt on May 20, 2008

    Comments: While other cities bemoan the loss of historic and architecturally significant structures it is sad that GA Tech has chosen to take this route. Building such a structure today is in some cases impossible or very expensive.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: David Ramsey on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Eddie Haskell on May 20, 2008

    Comments: tear the mother down

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Karen League on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Chad Spurlin on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Kristin Halloran on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Anonymous on May 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 50 › »