Signatures 477 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 10 › »
-
201
Name: Sarah Spencer on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
202
Name: Ricky A. Morneau on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
203
Name: David V. DeRosa on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Law Libraries are the heart of the law. It librarians are important resources ESPECIALLY TO SOLO PRACTITIONERS. Law Libraries are a necessity, even though not thought of as such very often. To lawyers, they are like an essential services like water or electricity in the home: always there and therefore not thought of very often, but sorely missed when they are gone. Even if staffed only part time, none of them should be closed.Flag
-
204
Name: Sharon Shanley on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
205
Name: Adrienne Wilson on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
206
Name: William J. Sarris on Jan 21, 2010Comments: longstanding and invaluable major resourceFlag
-
207
Name: Kelly Devlin on Jan 21, 2010Comments: As 1.) an attorney, 2.) a former MA Trial Court Law Library sub-contractor, and 3.) a current member of Florida State, Court and County Libraries, Inc., I can attest to the necessity of state court libraries to the administration of justice and function of the courts. Closing the library will have severe negative impacts on the courts as they will have to deal with more ill-prepared and uninformed litigants, represented and pro se.Flag
-
208
Name: Stephen Teti on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
209
Name: Lorna Rhyins on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Working in a public library with few legal resources, I frequently send people to the Bridgeport Law Library. Our patrons often need information to make important life decisions. These are not usually frivolous requests. There is no online location or other local information bank to help these people. Closing the Bridgeport Law Library would be a real loss to the public. Please keep these libraries open. Lorna RhyinsFlag
-
210
Name: Lorna Rhyins on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Working in a public library with few legal resources, I frequently send people to the Bridgeport Law Library. Our patrons often need information to make important life decisions. These are not usually frivolous requests. There is no online location or other local information bank to help these people. Closing the Bridgeport Law Library would be a real loss to the public. Please keep these libraries open. Lorna RhyinsFlag
-
211
Name: Diana Gomez on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
212
Name: Diana Gomez on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
213
Name: Tracy Vingo on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
214
Name: Remigio Melo Jr on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
215
Name: Allison L Jacobs on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Closing the library would be a terrible loss for all, attorneys, pro se parties, and the community. Please rethink this matter.Flag
-
216
Name: Ken Bjelka on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
217
Name: Rachael Payne on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
218
Name: Melissa Ellard on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
219
Name: Amanda Routhier on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
220
Name: Kirsten Pauli-Voss on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
221
Name: Lisa Metz on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
222
Name: Kathleen Nastri on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
223
Name: Kristen Zaehringer on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
224
Name: Cindy Robinson on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
225
Name: Nathan C. Nasser on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
226
Name: David A. Ball on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
227
Name: Bill L. Gouveia on Jan 21, 2010Comments: we need this great resource available to us.Flag
-
228
Name: Barry C Knott on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
229
Name: Kathleen Dunn on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
230
Name: Edward Czepiga on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
231
Name: Frank Bailey on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Closing the library deprives pro se litigants and the judges of the opportunity to review materials that are not readily available on line, such as legal encyclopedias and treatieses. Please find a way to keep the library open.Flag
-
232
Name: Heather Spaide on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
233
Name: Michael Bologna on Jan 21, 2010Comments: As a small firm practitioner with limited on-line resources, this closing will be a significant hardship to me. Okay, so you stop updating caselaw and statute reoports. We can live with that. But helpful staff and treatises and other materials not available on-line are the heart of the library, and extremely important.Flag
-
234
Name: Richard Slavin on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
235
Name: Samuel L Braunstein on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
236
Name: David L.Citronberg on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Outrageous! Have we all lost our minds? The Law Libraries are vital tools for for study and reference to our courts. Particularly the Law Library in Bridgeport, Connecticut's largest city with a huge volume of matters pending in the various courts-let's cut out the Governor's Horse Guard and save the library!Flag
-
237
Name: Susan Maria on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
238
Name: Frank A. Denicola, Jr. on Jan 21, 2010Comments: The Bridgeport Law Library is an extremely important part of the legal community, especially for small firms, who rely on it for their legal research. Closing the law library will make it harder, if not impossible, to perform complicated legal research in Bridgeport. The quality of the Bar will be reduced, and clients will suffer. It is a huge step backwards. I strongly urge you to reconsider.Flag
-
239
Name: Linda R. Christiani on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
240
Name: LORI A. DASILVA on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
241
Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
242
Name: Roger Lee Crossland, Esq. on Jan 21, 2010Comments: One of the most populous cities in Connecticut must have a law library for the public.Flag
-
243
Name: Anthony LaBella, Esq. on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
244
Name: Joyce A Riccio on Jan 21, 2010Comments: Closing the Bridgeport library is beyond my comprehension. The library is in use constantly. Once again, Bridgeport is deemed unnecessary. But it is not, the library needs to remain open for the numerous pro se litigants. To put them in a position where they have to go either Stamford or New Haven is absurd. Pro se litigants are in a financial bind and forcing them to somehow get to Stamford or New Haven is ridiculous. Why not close New Haven or Stamford? From either of those courthouses, one would only have to drive 20 miles to get to the Bridgeport courthouse.Flag
-
245
Name: Adam Schlein on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
246
Name: Richard A. Cerrato on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
247
Name: Dennis C. Murphy, Esq on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
248
Name: Lenny Crone on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
249
Name: Seth O.L. Brody on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
250
Name: Cynthia C. Bott on Jan 21, 2010Comments:Flag