Signatures 519 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 11 › »

1. 101
   Name: Steven Gornitzky on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Sean Woods on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Keith Balderston on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments: That fact that Braniff has played a such a huge part of many that grew up in Dallas, worked for the company says this should be saved! And that mid-century, AMAZING architecture - that 'V" roofline with the all glass front -- way too precious to let go!!!

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Vishal Parmar on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments: This is one of th most historical aviation structures around. should be preserved as a museum.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Pattie South Nitschke on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments: Please don't tear down this historic piece of Braniff history.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Kim K Nielsen on Oct 17, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Tyler on Oct 18, 2012

   Comments: Aviation is important, old or new! Keep any of it around and it will make many avgeeks proud!

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Chris Brock on Oct 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Bede Ley on Oct 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Ed Hale on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Steve Suhn on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: I am shocked and saddened that the city has no concern about the history of the building and wants to demolish it, but the same people would sell the Texas School Book Depository if they could make a buck!

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Carolyn Nickols on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Angie Benson on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: Braniff was such a major part of Dallas' history and this building is such a fine example of mid century architecture. Its rare to see an airline maintenance base done in mid century. This must be saved.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Elizabeth Allen on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: I drove past this building every day for 30 years going to my office. I still want to see this building on occasion. Please save it.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Roy Lee Ice on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: This is an important part of Dallas' aviation history. Every effort must be made to save it.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Michael B. Lewis on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: What an amazing building. Aiports are for aviation functions not commercial retail. Save this building for future generations.

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Mary E. Benson on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Jack McKenzie on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Kevin Sobba on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: save the building

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Dan Taylor on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: its a class act and great landmark foraviation at love field. save it!

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anthony Stramaglia on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: We've lost, and are in danger of losing, too many historically and architecturally important buildings and structures in the name of so-called progress. What exactly is wrong with this building that it can't be refurbished and re-purposed responsibly? If it's torn down, won't another building just be built in its place anyway? The Corgan Associates rendering looks classy and modern and would easily revitalize the surrounding area and offer attractive rental property and facilities. There are always alternatives. BELIEVE IT!

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Roland Upton on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Steve C. Byars on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: This building is an integral part of Dallas' great eaviation history and it certainly can be adaptively re-positioned going into the future as an element of a larger devleopment along Lemmon. It must be saved. Dallas has torn down too much in the past and this building is easily suitbale to new uses. Thank you.

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Silvia Sandler Kent on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Chantal Wright on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Chris Brock on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Bruce A Walther on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Antonio Luis Sapienza on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: It's a historical building and part of the history of Dallas. It should remain as a monument of one of the most wonderful airline in the history of commercial aviation in the United States, BRANIFF INTERNATIONAL. The building could be used as a site for a future museum of this airline!!!!!

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Rebecca Newman on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: This is a piece of Dallas and aviation history that should not be destroyed.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Raenell Davis on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: This building is a historial part of Dallas History and should be saved.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Carolyn Casey on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Alexander Rodriguez on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: This building is historically significant, not only for its size, design and use by Braniff, but in regards to the assination of President Kennedy. Virtually every film of the President landing in Dallas has that Braniff building in the background, not to mention the takeoff after Johnson is inaugurated.

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Erik Swanson on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: Quit tearing down Dallas' history!

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Dave Orvis on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: The Braniff terminal is a critical piece of Dallas' history. Please help preserve it! -Dave Orvis

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Jeff Garrett on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: A.J Murello on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Susan Chadwick on Oct 18, 2012

    Comments: Please save this last piece of Braniff history!

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: I am all for saving interesting and unique pieces of architecture... the best results have a great deal of human heart and sould built into them... whether intentionally or not. We cannot save the all, and many cannot be reused as their original intended purposes.. but we can sift through all of them and get the best to be put out there.

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Michael Benson on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Catherine Mooney on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: Have great memories of Braniff. I was stationed in Washington, DC and Braniff was was the airline used to go home to NY on leave, etc. I even remember what the ticket cost, $86.00.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Gus Blouir on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Todd McElfresh on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: Let's look at other options for this landmark!

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Shanee Birch on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: Great job!

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Hendrick Stoops on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: April Culver on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Kathryn Blackham on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: Save it!

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Tom Frye on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments: The Braniff facilites at Love Field is a historic landmark that needs to be preserved. Braniff was a huge part of the history of Dallas aviation and a place of many personal memories, including eating lunch after church in the Braniff cafeteria and watching the Cowboys depart for their Super Bowls in the 1970s.

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Michael Bradley on Oct 20, 2012

    Comments: Please save a part of Dallas' history.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 11 › »