Signatures 514 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 11 › »
-
51
Name: Carol Rosa on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: Peter Weber on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Jonathan Braddick on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
54
Name: Catherine Lewis on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Rob Howard on Oct 14, 2012Comments: Braniff was such an important part of Dallas' early aviation history.Flag
-
56
Name: David Kirkland on Oct 14, 2012Comments: Why not find a creative way to repurpose this important building- I would like to see Dallas preserve its history for a change rather than bulldoze it.Flag
-
57
Name: Wade W. Crawford on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Anonymous on Oct 14, 2012Comments: I am a former Braniff employee and think it would be very sad to destroy an important part of Dallas history. It seems to me that the building could possibly be restored and given new life as a museum or for some other worthwhile use. Destroying a big part of Love Field and Dallas history is not the way to go.Flag
-
59
Name: Erik Michelson on Oct 14, 2012Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Noah Jeppson on Oct 15, 2012Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Colin Downey on Oct 15, 2012Comments: Shame on you, City of Dallas! Another crazy idea!Flag
-
62
Name: Paul F. Moore on Oct 15, 2012Comments: I would like to see this old Braniff Maintenance Base facility remain in place. I feet tne City of Dallas is not being a fair and equitable airport partner, having not rented the space out to some Air Industry tenent, during these years. I worked in this building for over 20 years, on the third floor, along with hundreds of Braniff people. This facility had over 4,000 workers during the week, with hundreds more on the weekends/holidays.Flag
-
63
Name: Elizabeth Cox on Oct 15, 2012Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Dermot Thompson on Oct 16, 2012Comments: It's an architectural gem which is part of the city's heritage and ought to be put to new and sympathetic use.Flag
-
65
Name: Will Risinger on Oct 16, 2012Comments: Save the braniff HQ on Lemmon. Dallas needs some historyFlag
-
66
Name: Anonymous on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
67
Name: Monica Risinger Kinsey on Oct 16, 2012Comments: Important part of Dallas History needs to be saved!Flag
-
68
Name: Joseph Meyers on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Alan Goodrich on Oct 16, 2012Comments: Dallas has already lost too many architecturally significant buildings. This could be restored beautifullyFlag
-
70
Name: Marcus Watson on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Travis Pope on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Anonymous on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
73
Name:
Gregory Brooks on Oct 16, 2012
Comments:Flag -
74
Name: Judy Kirk Conatser on Oct 16, 2012Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Rob Elmore on Oct 16, 2012Comments: Don't destroy any more of the architectural history that we have left in Dallas. These buildings can be repurposed and have a long useful life.Flag
-
76
Name: Steven Shatsky on Oct 16, 2012Comments: Save the Braniff building at Love Field! It would be unforgivable to lose this piece of our city's history!Flag
-
77
Name: Susan Mangigian on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Save this lovely building.Flag
-
78
Name: Erin Nicole Parisi on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Please save this interesting piece of Dallas and aviation history. We have "lost" too much of our architectural heritage already in Dallas.Flag
-
79
Name: Jo Soss on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Patrick Tester on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: Barbara Stone on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
82
Name: Warren Nash on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
83
Name: Stephen Birch on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Keep fighting for this historic building!!Flag
-
84
Name: CHAD HALBACH on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Braniff was a classic!!Flag
-
85
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Save this historical site.Flag
-
86
Name: Bicknell Eubanks on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Too often Dallas has destroyed its heritage in the name of progress only to regret the action later.Flag
-
87
Name: JULIO on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: John Ashley on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Roberto E Napoles on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Roger Brand on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: David M. Losson on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Diane Baxter on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Peter Clapham on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Certainly, a building of such design can be reused or redeveloped instead of another tilt up structure?Flag
-
96
Name:
Jeffrey Hernandez on Oct 17, 2012
Comments:Flag -
97
Name: Alexander Martin on Oct 17, 2012Comments: Please save this piece of aviation history! There is little left from the jet age, and as a college student (who was not alive during the jet age), I find it saddening that so much has been torn down. I would love to get to see these symbols of aviation glory, and I would like future generations to also see them. Also, lets do the same for the Pan Am Worldport (T3 at JFK), which Delta is planning to demolish in May 2013. So many historical events happened at this building, and it should not be destroyed.Flag
-
98
Name: S. Seely on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: Nelson on Oct 17, 2012Comments: While I'm all for advancement I'm very much about preserving American history for future Americans. We're a young country but we should have a solid historical foundation. Braniff was once a very important part of our daily fabric. It shouldn't be forgotten.Flag
-
100
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2012Comments:Flag