Signatures 340 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 › »
-
101
Name: Jean Phillips on Oct 8, 2012Comments: Too much is being destroyed.The park MUST be left as it is and no more desecration allowed.Our children and their children must be allowed to enjoy this facility.Flag
-
102
Name: Robert Huw Phillips on Oct 8, 2012Comments: So many green areas are being destroyed and this must not be yet another of those. Heath Park is one of the few left in the area and must not be made smaller. Our trees are our childrens' heritage as is the peace found therein. PLEASE NEVER DESTROY THIS.Flag
-
103
Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Richard Tyrrell on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Peter Jones on Oct 8, 2012Comments: If the council give more of our land to the private club CMES who will be next in line for an acre or two?Flag
-
107
Name: Jennifer Griffiths on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Joanne Wells on Oct 8, 2012Comments: I oppose the extention to the railway track in Heath Park, we should not lose anymore land, there aren't very many greenland spaces left and as we've just had the Olympics it's criminal that land would be taken away from the general publicFlag
-
109
Name: Alex Tyrrell on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
110
Name: Ceri Collins on Oct 8, 2012Comments: The railway is only accessible to the public for 4 hours 13 days a year. They charge for the rides AND entry and make a HUGE profit.. The park is for the public not an exclusive club for men and their exclusive hobby. They have a very nice railway club already and should not be allowed to take away more. Please do not allow the lease of any more of the park. Thank youFlag
-
111
Name: Stephan Miles on Oct 8, 2012Comments: Incredibly our council does not see protection of our parkland as a priority and are willing to accept planning applications to build on them. The community MUST make their voice known to the council to demand they stop this type of development or other applications will follow.Flag
-
112
Name: Jacky Miles on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Alex Miles on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Gareth Evans on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Jan Westlake on Oct 8, 2012Comments: I would like to register my objection to the proposed model railway extension at Heath ParkFlag
-
116
Name: J G FRENCH on Oct 8, 2012Comments: I am opposed to any development on the Heath Park Site.Flag
-
117
Name: Ivy Yeo on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: K Jones on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Bronwen Davies on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: David Howells on Oct 8, 2012Comments: The miniature railway has spoiled the park enough!Flag
-
121
Name: Anita Willicombe on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Bronwen Evans on Oct 8, 2012Comments: I fully support this petition for reasons outlined in the brief paragraph above describing the petition.Flag
-
123
Name: Simon Derbyshire on Oct 9, 2012Comments: Keep the park for the public!Flag
-
124
Name: Gareth Miles on Oct 9, 2012Comments: Parks are growing trees, not cutting them!Flag
-
125
Name: Brenda Miles on Oct 9, 2012Comments: Please leave the woodlands alone.Flag
-
126
Name: David F Allan on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Mr. Keith Burnett on Oct 9, 2012Comments: I strongly object to the extention of the model railway in Heath Park.Flag
-
128
Name: Mra. Gaynor Burnett on Oct 9, 2012Comments: I object to extention of model railway in Heath Park.Flag
-
129
Name: Glenn Jones on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
130
Name: Bruce Ford on Oct 9, 2012Comments: The Heath Park has been greately reduced in size in the 65 years I and my family have been using it. Past developements include King George V Drive, UHW, Parks Department Offices, CMES & the carpark. No further encroachment should be allowed on this land.Flag
-
131
Name: JB Kingdon on Oct 9, 2012Comments: Woodland & widlife are ireplaceable & commercial development should be avoided at all cost.Flag
-
132
Name: Jill Vincent on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Margaret Hall on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: Alison Tye on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
135
Name: Gareth Tye on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
136
Name: Wendy A. Allan on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Nicole Weber on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Melissa McMurtrie on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: Laura Miles on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Jessica Brookes on Oct 10, 2012Comments: don't destroy Heath parkFlag
-
141
Name: Jessica Brookes on Oct 10, 2012Comments: don't destroy Heath parkFlag
-
142
Name: Alan Waddington on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
143
Name: Shaun Harding on Oct 10, 2012Comments: I am strongly opposed to the extension plans for Heath Park Minature Railway. I believe the current size and and area occupied by the railway is more than enough and any further expansion will have a serious detrimental impact on Heath Park in general.Flag
-
144
Name: Daniela Bress on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
145
Name: Nick Jones on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Diane Davies on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
148
Name: P Taylor on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
149
Name: Elisabeth Bechmann on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag