Stop the Proposed Development of Heath Park Woods

Signatures 340 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »

1. 51
   Name: Heulwen Stone on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments: Leave our parklands alone-too many have gone already.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Peter Michael Caine on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments: I am strongly against the further development at Heath Park.

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Mervyn Joseph on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Lesley Jones on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments: spoiling a local green area used by many for the pleasure of a few.

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Jenny Steele on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Steve Ankin on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Debbie Lynch on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments: I do hope our petition will allow pause for reflection.

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Gwynfryn Evans on Oct 6, 2012

   Comments: I think I have made my objections clear on numerous previous occasions.

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: John Kosinski on Oct 7, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Meagan Smith on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Michael Morgan on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: With the price of land at a premium, giving this extra land to the C.M.E.S. cheaply, allowing them to make more money for themselves,is utterly wrong, and depriving regular users - tax payers - of the use of this land is deplorable.

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: James Smith on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Stephen Lees on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anne Broadway on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: David Carpenter on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I think it appalling that a private, money making society should be given even more public land for their own purposes at the expense of existing wildlife (e.g. loss of habitat), the danger and inconvenience of construction to both children and adults and loss of tranquility and rights of way on public land.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Patricia Caine on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Liz R Morgan on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: Sorry cant make it on Monday, at agility club with my dog.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Charlotte Keigwin on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Hywel John on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Lynne Keigwin on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Steve Keigwin on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Joanna Keigwin on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Michael Hollyman on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: This is another time to stand up and be counted .We should value our green areas more highly.

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Lynne Taylor on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I have been walking in those woods since I was a child and I find it amazing that there is consideration being given to replacing a facility that has given and continues to give pleasure to many people, residents and visitors alike with one that will not be available at all times to the many. This is even without mentioning the large environmental impact of decimating a mature woodland and the habitat of many important species

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: M. A. Aldridge on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Christine Barnett on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I think the planned extension would be detrimental to wildlife , would disturb the peace and tranquility and would restrict access to what I thought was PUBLIC LAND.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Tina Sutton on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Debra Page on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: strontly oppose the proposed developmnt.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Mal James Jenkins on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: N.G.Reyland on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: M.D.Reyland on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Ben Armstrong on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I believe that this development would have a significantly detrimental impact of the landscape of the park and the enjoyment of the area for the local residents and the general public alike.

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Rhiannon Armstrong on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I would like to register my objection to the proposed development. People who freely walk in and enjoy the woods now will not be able to do so.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Alan Jones on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: on-line signature given as may not be at home when calling for signature

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Aislin Hollyman on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Aled Williams on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Susannah Coles on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Jayne Moore on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Mike Toozer on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: I object strongly to extending the model railway site and to the disposal of the land in question by the Council and Fields in Trust.

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Anthony Douglas-Jones on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments: The Engineering Society has enough land already. Why should the few benefit to the detriment of the many?

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: D.M. Johns on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Russell Jones on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Debbie Tyrrell on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments: Although I don't now live in Cardiff I was brought up in the Heath and spent many happy hours as a child playing in the woods- surely not all green spaces have to be taken -hasn't the Hospital taken enough already?

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Gary Phillips on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Aimee Smith on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Martin Phillips on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Jean Bool on Oct 8, 2012

    Comments: it is a park for people and wildlife not model trains!!!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »