Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 295 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 »

  1. 1
    Name: Tony King on Nov 30, 2004
    Comments: Hands off!
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Benjamin Waterhouse on Nov 30, 2004
    Comments: Ex 5RRF
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Evan Warren on Nov 30, 2004
    Comments: Once a unit is scrapped it and it's traditions and skills are lost forever - such actions should only be taken in the very, very last resort. Good luck to the 2nd Bn
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Gary Smith on Nov 30, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Harry Cole on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: John Hill on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: If anything expand the Fusiliers and other larger Regiments they Your super regiments are in existence and the Fusiliers are the part of the model
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Graeme Ferguson on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: I believe that it is absolutely scandelous that yet again the British Government is slashing their troops and they want them to be for ever more the "Armed Wing of Oxfam"
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Kate Neale on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Guy Benn on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: If the issue of axing the Balck Watch is so sensitive, surely the whole concept of cutting the Infantry is incorrect
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Corinne Barwood on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Why do the Paras escape every cut back despite not having a role in the modern army - parachutes were last deployed in the 2nd world war and they are unable to fulfil any other infantry role such as armoured etc. Is it to do with favouritism of the people in charge who happen to be Paras!!!
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Chris Baker on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Anne Blackmore on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Gemma Seal on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Wendy Coulson-loades on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Mehmet Kavaz on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Alexander Clark on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: serving in 2RRF 1995-1999 C COY FUSILIERS (TA) 1999 TODATE....
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Neil Cox on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Alex Wong on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Gary Cottrill on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: John McClintock on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: N Parker on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State: DE
    Country: UK
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Dan Vaux-Nobes on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Michele Coombes on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Kate Tate on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: John ONeill on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Stefan Edwards on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Ainsley Faulkner on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Stuart Nicholson on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Why, when all the Scottish Regiments are disappearing anyway, is an English Regiment (with good manning) having to fall on its sword. Why is tokenism leading the descision rather than common sense. With the RRF loosing a Bn we will no doubt see the entire Queens Division becoming a single Regiment. Therefore - three English Regiments disappear so that Scotland can retain an undermanned Bn.
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Chris Calam-Hale on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Why oh why in this age of constant deployments is th infantry squeezed just to claw back cash - Soldiering on a shoe string = bad idea !!
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Trevor Elliott on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: The British Army has a proud tradition of Regiments. The current level of commitment far outweighs the level of troops available to deal wwith them. Anyone looking at the current state of world affairs can see that this commitment is only likely to get bigger. We must act now to ensure we are able to continue to provide a secure defense for the British Isles and also to provide peacekeepers around the world.
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Jonathan Smith on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: The armed forces are already under strength - there should be NO reduction in their numbers
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: David Thomas on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Harriett Roderigues on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Robert Franklin on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Do not let this fine British Regiment lose another Battalion. After the first Gulf War the government rewarded their efforts by cutting the 3rd Battalion and now, after last year's war, they do the same to the 2nd Battilion. It is crazy to cut the infantry. It is one of the most over worked part of the army. Even if areas of it are understrength it is not an excuse to cut it back further. 3 understrength battalions can do more tours than 2 full strength battalions!
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Stephen Lee on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Warren P. Block on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Secretary - Royal Victoria Regiment Association, Melbourne Australia
    State:
    Country: AU
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Ian Nicholson on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Tim Pinkstone on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments: Best of luck
    State:
    Country: RU
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Tim Welch on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Iain Henderson on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: RU
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Hannah Jeneson on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Richard Goby on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Nick Channon on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Will Turner on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Wilson Ma on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Martin Runnacles on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Mark Grainger on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Roozy Aliakebab on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Adam Demery on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments: I am a serving TA Fusilier who has recently returned from regular service in Iraq.
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Stephanie Gawthorpe on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: UK
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 »

Sponsored links