Save the view from the Kelvin Walkway and Queen Margaret Drive Bridge

Signatures 204 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 51
   Name: Amy Tickell on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments: I feel there are far more important things happening in this world than continuing to build housing most people cannot afford.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Alan Falconer on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: David Alcock on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments: It's important for the City's heritage tourism to celebrate Greek Thomson and CR Mackintosh. Now that we have open vistas to the SE from the QM bridge and from the 60 Steps, it would be an act of folly to obscure North Park Terrace and the Mackintosh annex to North Park House.

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Hannah Russell on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Laura Kerr on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Calum McCallum on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Claire Stewart on Feb 20, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 21, 2013

   Comments: Please ensure that the Kelvin walkway and the area around the proposed development site, the former BBC headquarters site by Queen Margaret Drive, are protected from careless development! These areas are precious to Glasgow residents!

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Alastair Lings on Feb 21, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Greg Hurst on Feb 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Chiara Berardelli on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Kevin Tee on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: Eye sore!!!

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Tom Kernaghan on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: I agree with the comments above - the proposed development is excessively intensive, the blocks of flats are too high and they come too close to the river.

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Gareth Johnston on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Unsustainable proposal - failed model too dense

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Mark Waldron on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: it's for the people.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Hilary Goodfellow on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Miriam on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Stephen Robertson on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: The West End that I grew up in has been systematically blighted by the endless building of new flats. The area is already overpopulated and congested with traffic. The River Kelvin is the jewel of the West End and its only haven for wildlife. Progressive, intelligent planning would understand and protect this, but Glasgow councillors are notorious for ham-fisted, short-sighted and ultimately crass decision-making.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Martin Neil on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Joy Mitchell on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: The area around the River Kelvin is an oasis in a large city, especially one called Dear Green Place. Please help keep our name real.

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Liane Coia on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Carol Jamnejad on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Reuben Mercee on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Jamie MacBrayne on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Debbie Hunter on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Jane McInally on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Brian R. Morrison on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: plans for development on the site formerly known as Broadcasting House 30 Queen Margaret Drive Glasgow should be amended to protect the Kelvin Walkway, and the views of the river bank from the Walkway and the Queen Margaret Drive Bridge.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Laurence King on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: Such developments are in direct contradiction to Glasgow City Council Development Plans that recognise the value of open spaces with natural corridors such as the Kelvin.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Adrian Mcmurchie on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Claire Stewart on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Yvonne Kincaid on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Sunil Kadri on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Alyson Gregor on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Liam Stewart on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Alice Dansey-Wright on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Linda on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Emma Fisher on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Sarah Galloway on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments: Please save our 'dear green place'.

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Stephanie Twigg on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Neil Lovelock on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Sarah Stuart on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Jane Watt on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: David McKinven on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments: I strongly object to the planned development in this area.

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Lorraine Hamilton on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Clair Crawford on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Robert Ritchie on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments: should be doing all we can to retain the beauty if our local surroundings

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Craig Mulholland on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »