Signatures 204 total
-
1
Name: L A Cairney on Feb 18, 2013Comments: We've lost enough natural beauty in the City - please don't allow it to continue!Flag
-
2
Name: Lucy Reynolds on Feb 18, 2013Comments: The natural habitat of the Kelvin Walkway is a wonderful local asset, and I am passionate about protecting itFlag
-
3
Name: Lyn Dunachie on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Steve Ansell on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I support the petitionFlag
-
5
Name:
Sally Johnston on Feb 18, 2013
Comments: Please reconsider the scale and size of this proposed development and the non reversible impact it will have on the riverside environment, wildlife and especially the interruption to bird flight paths.Flag -
6
Name: Paul Dobricki on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Love cycling in the middle of a city when you don't feel like your in the middle of a cityFlag
-
7
Name: Robert Anderson on Feb 18, 2013Comments: such a monstrosity that adds nothing architecturally or culturally to the areaFlag
-
8
Name: Fionna Eden-Bushell on Feb 18, 2013Comments: The Kelvin Walkway and views from Queen Margaret Bridge are what make this one of the most beautiful areas of any UK city and the building designed by Charles Rennie Mackintosh has a chance of being recognised if the surrounding buildings do not encroach upon it.Flag
-
9
Name: Alan Bonnyman on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Debbie Tennent on Feb 18, 2013Comments: not just the view but the wildlife of the riverside will be compromised by the planned developmentsFlag
-
11
Name: Colin Thom on Feb 18, 2013Comments: My favourite part of GlasgowFlag
-
12
Name: Liz Dougan on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Mark Daniels on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Jonathan Ridge on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Emma Reynolds on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Professor Martin Cloonan on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Michael Reynolds on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I was brought up in Sauchiehall Street and Bearsden and my student `digs` were in Kelvinbridge and Kelvinside. Since the days of my youth, the beauty, wildlife habitat and amenity of this reach of the river has greatly improved. PLEASE ensure that new buildings are kept to a scale which enhances this improvement and doesn`t permanently blemish this wonderful area.Flag
-
18
Name: Claire C. Madden on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Lee Vickers on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Fiona Porter on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Alistair Bulloch on Feb 19, 2013Comments: How can they consider scarring one of the most beautiful parts of Glasgow?Flag
-
22
Name: Dr. Desmond Gilmore on Feb 19, 2013Comments: I feel that if this development goes ahead it will be a disaster for folk who use the Walkway.Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2013Comments: Spare us this monstrosity.. Learn from edinburgh's dreadful mistakes at Granton Harbour.Flag
-
24
Name: Robbie Hawthorne on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Robin McKenzie on Feb 19, 2013Comments: My wife and I walk the 'Kelvin Walk', as we like to call it, at least twice a week, and we introduce it to all our visitors. It must be preserved, indeed enhanced for future generations. It's an integral part of the 'West. end'.Flag
-
26
Name: Mairiclaire Macpherson on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Morag Armstrong on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Felicity GRainger on Feb 19, 2013Comments: This would be a terrible loss for the residents and visitors to the area of the River Kelvin.Flag
-
29
Name: Coralia Jianu on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Sarah Jane Davidson on Feb 19, 2013Comments: This is a stunning site of great natural and historical importance, and very prominent on the Kelvin Walkway. Please let's not ruin yet another cherished part of the city with more inappropriate developments.Flag
-
31
Name: Joyce Wilson on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Steven Palmer on Feb 19, 2013Comments: Living in a high rise flat in Maryhill this area is very important to me and my children. We need to protect our "dear green place"Flag
-
33
Name: Kenny Craig on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: A. Mark Eden-Bushell on Feb 19, 2013Comments: As the person who started the Friends of the River Kelvin over 20 years ago, I love the Kelvin Walkway and the vioews both from it and of it, and would far prefer that the plans for the Old B.B.C. building be changed so these views could be prersedrvbed.Flag
-
35
Name: Victoria Culshaw on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Graham Collins on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: A. Mark Eden-Bushell on Feb 19, 2013Comments: As a Friend of the River Kelvin I competly agree that the views to and from the Queen Margaret Drive Bridge and the Kelvin Walkway should be left open. I would ask that the wording be adjusted to include these.Flag
-
38
Name: Allan Tall on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Stewart Dunlop on Feb 19, 2013Comments: This is insenditive and unacceptableFlag
-
40
Name: Trudymurdoch on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Judith Sweeney on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Mick McMahon on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Drew Mulholland on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Marion Rodger on Feb 19, 2013Comments: I feel this development is not in keeping with the surroundings and will blight the area. Also, has the stability of the bank been taken into consideration? The river has already caused significant erosion at other sites.Flag
-
46
Name: John Fern on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Alison Spurway on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Rachael Smith on Feb 19, 2013Comments: This is a beautiful part of the city and will be spoilt by the current plans. It is important that Glasgow City Council maintains the green spaces and lush green views that the city is known for. Investment should be placed in renovating old buildings to retain our heritage in architecture and keep spaces tidy.Flag
-
49
Name: Iain Wotherspoon on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
50
Name:
Tesla Msichana on Feb 20, 2013
Comments:Flag