Signatures 483 total
-
1
Name: Terry Smithson on May 7, 2012Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Aaron on May 7, 2012Comments: how can the NIEA promote such schemes when salmon numbers are at crisis levelsFlag
-
3
Name: Gardiner Mitchell on May 7, 2012Comments: Considering declining salmon and other migratory fish populations and the steps being taken to try and help the situation these hydros are madness!Flag
-
4
Name: Professor Chris Paris on May 7, 2012Comments: great stuffFlag
-
5
Name: Brian Mc Gillion on May 7, 2012Comments: NIEA are promoting and granting licences for this murdering machines at a time when catch /release is about to be introduced.This action by the NIEA must be stopped sooner rather that later to ensure salmon stocks do not decline any furtherFlag
-
6
Name: Ad Swier on May 8, 2012Comments: eedjits all over the place... it seems!Flag
-
7
Name: Gary Bell on May 8, 2012Comments: This is an absolute disgrace !Flag
-
8
Name: Eugene Early on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Stevie Munn on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Peter Vernon on May 8, 2012Comments: Salmon are an endangered species in Irish and other Atlantic waters. Adding pressure to the delicate environment that supports them with hydros that are proven to damage the breeding of Salmon is at best poorly thought out and at worst totally stupid. lets take a lead from the Canadians that lead the world in conservation and keep Salmon in our rivers!Flag
-
11
Name: Pieter Swier, The Netherlands on May 8, 2012Comments: .. i totally agree with my dad (see above)...Flag
-
12
Name: Beaumont on May 8, 2012Comments: totally agreedFlag
-
13
Name: Nigel Rush on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Steef Meijers on May 8, 2012Comments: Keep on fighting!Flag
-
15
Name: John on May 8, 2012Comments: Theses Hydro schemes are doing nothing for the environment when you consider the cost of installing and running them. The damage they are causing to the environment and habitat of wild life and fish, they can only be described as environmental vandalism. They are only being installed for a financial benefit to the operator.Flag
-
16
Name: Mark Corps on May 8, 2012Comments: environmentslly friendly electricity.... but not too fish. Arent they meant to be protected?Flag
-
17
Name: Kevin Crowley on May 8, 2012Comments: Hydro destroyed salmon runs on the Erne, Shannon, Liffey and Lee, not to mention many smaller rivers. I guess salmon don't count against "progress"...Flag
-
18
Name: Larry Swire on May 8, 2012Comments: This hydro is an absolute disaster!! Why do the powers in charge seem hellbent on destroying one of the finest salmon systems in Europe just for what is in fashion at the time. Absolutely crazy!Flag
-
19
Name: Robbie Marshall on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Darren Lue on May 8, 2012Comments: save our salmonFlag
-
21
Name: Connor Grimes on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Martin Dangerfield on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Andy Bowman on May 8, 2012Comments: Remember the River Garry in Scotland. At the time one of the best rivers in Europe - lost Forever.Flag
-
24
Name: John Todd on May 8, 2012Comments: It is imperitive that the stsatuatory authorities finally start to look after one ofr our finest natural resources, the salmon and other wild fish.Flag
-
25
Name: A J Hamilton on May 8, 2012Comments: I strongly support this petition and urge you to stop these hydro schemes immediately before they destroy our salmon stocks.Flag
-
26
Name: Brian C.Culbert on May 8, 2012Comments: You may as well let the anglers exterminate the salmon runs and do away with catch and release? The Hydro schemes will surley do a better job on the remaining smolts.Flag
-
27
Name: Raymond Martin on May 8, 2012Comments: good luck with it.Flag
-
28
Name: Mark Tierney on May 8, 2012Comments: USE WINDPOWER OR SOLAR ENERGY, BUT LEAVE OUR RIVERS ALONE!!!!!Flag
-
29
Name: Kenneth Cutting on May 8, 2012Comments: I have never been to Ireland though many of my ancestors hail from the Emerald Isle and I may never arrive at her shores. But one thing that I know is that salmon are important - to our heritage, to our health and to our environment - save these salmon and you save a bit of all of us no matter where we are. Thank you.Flag
-
30
Name: Martina Tierney on May 8, 2012Comments: Protect our rivers. If not for yourselves, then for future generations!Flag
-
31
Name: Peter Tierney on May 8, 2012Comments: Stop ALL hydros NOWFlag
-
32
Name: Niamh Tierney on May 8, 2012Comments: When i grow up i want to see salmon in our riversFlag
-
33
Name:
Arch Pitcher on May 8, 2012
Comments:Flag -
34
Name: Caitlin Tierney on May 8, 2012Comments: Please save our salmonFlag
-
35
Name: Kieran Tully on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Jason Mcconkey on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Piet Geelhoed on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: NIGEL QUINN on May 8, 2012Comments: One Day soon us fishermen will take action ourselves. You destroy out sport, we'l destroy your pocketsFlag
-
39
Name: Richard Browne on May 8, 2012Comments: At least 4 of these are planned for the Faughan. An area that the salmon are meant to be protected under European law. How then can these even be under consideration?Flag
-
40
Name: John Fairgrieve on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Lawson Davies on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Patrick O Neill on May 8, 2012Comments: i think its waste time and money which could be used to help young people in the town to get full or part time jobs,and thats were the money should have being spend on, i think my self its big white elephant.Flag
-
43
Name:
David McCool on May 8, 2012
Comments:Flag -
44
Name: Robert Ivan Grieve on May 8, 2012Comments: please help stop this madnessFlag
-
45
Name: Michael Collins on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Cyril Kerr on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Gerry Wilson on May 8, 2012Comments: please stop this madnessFlag
-
48
Name: David Sim on May 8, 2012Comments: MADNESS!!!Flag
-
49
Name: Stephen Kennedy on May 8, 2012Comments: Well done Guys , keep on the CaseFlag
-
50
Name: Michael Shortt on May 8, 2012Comments:Flag