Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 365 total

Page: « 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 »

  1. 301
    Name: Kate Wilson on Mar 8, 2013
    Comments: As a member of the Ramblers Association I have walked in several other areas of the city that do not have a warden service and have been dismayed at the major littering, flytipping and vandalism on view. This is likely to be the fate of the Mersey Valley without its wardens. Please don't let one of the best things about South Manchester be destroyed by the cuts!
    Flag
  2. 302
    Name: Amy Bennett on Mar 8, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 303
    Name: Mark Whidby on Mar 9, 2013
    Comments: When obesity amongst children is so prevalent you should be increasing spenditure on ways to encourage young people to excercise more - not cutting back on such facilities.
    Flag
  4. 304
    Name: Christina Brindley on Mar 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 305
    Name: Margaret Manning on Mar 9, 2013
    Comments: The council could challenge the governemt to collect taxes from the rich and big business instead of cotting our vital services. Cutting such services goes against the targets to cut obesity and encourage healthy lifestyles many local people walk and do other exrecise here who would not or could not afford to go further afield We need our well maintained green lungs for our city
    Flag
  6. 306
    Name: Tom Baker on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments: Even the idea of cutting the MVCWS is a foolish one, let alone actually carrying on and disbanding it completely. Anyone who uses the area can see the benefit and value of the service. The whole of the Mersey Valley is a very well maintained area and without the service, one dreads to think of the consequences. There is a consultation meeting on 12 March from 4.45 at St Barnabus Church Hall on the corner of Hardy Lane and Hurstville Avenue. Please attend and make it clear to the policy makers behind this decision that this is a service that needs to kept intact.
    Flag
  7. 307
    Name: Tom Baker on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments: Even the idea of cutting the MVCWS is a foolish one, let alone actually carrying on and disbanding it completely. Anyone who uses the area can see the benefit and value of the service. The whole of the Mersey Valley is a very well maintained area and without the service, one dreads to think of the consequences. There is a consultation meeting on 12 March from 4.45 at St Barnabus Church Hall on the corner of Hardy Lane and Hurstville Avenue. Please attend and make it clear to the policy makers behind this decision that this is a service that needs to kept intact.
    Flag
  8. 308
    Name: Jim Turner on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 309
    Name: Stephen Walker on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 310
    Name: Vicky Mcintyre on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 311
    Name: Vicky Mcintyre on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 312
    Name: Louise Sharma on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 313
    Name: Hans Sharma on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 314
    Name: Barbara Chatterton on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 315
    Name: Ann Staziker on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 316
    Name: Nathan Chatterton-Sherburn on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments: save the waterpark! save the world!!!
    Flag
  17. 317
    Name: Carl Sharma on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments: we need this wonderful area to run and play and take our dogs and meets people.
    Flag
  18. 318
    Name: Mike Bones on Mar 10, 2013
    Comments: I, whole heatedly support this position to 'save' the Mersey Valley Warden Service, not just in the Manchester area but also Trafford (and to a lesser extent Stockport border). Trafford Council decision to withdrawn all funding for the service has lead to Manchester Council having to make such drastic cuts, at least M. C. left a small amount to leave the MVWS still there. Please contact Trafford Council also, to voice concerns. My concern is once it is gone, it could be gone forever. This 'time of austerity' is a convenient period to let the service go, no amount of dedicated volunteers can match experienced, knowledgeable professionals. There has been over the last 10 years far too many wardens and support staff left, seconded, ground down by what has already happened. There are real environmental concerns, the 'Save Alexander Park' group and the 'Keep Trafford Green and Clean' to list two, to raise attention to their causes. Please support in any way to protect and preserve our green spaces.
    Flag
  19. 319
    Name: Abi Heron on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 320
    Name: Richard Fletcher on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 321
    Name: Suzie Thompson on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 322
    Name: Emma Dillon on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 323
    Name: Rosemary Breen on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments: ITS A VALUABLE SEVICE THAT SHOULD NOT BE CUT. WEVE SEEN THIS IN TOO MANY OTHER AREAS WERE CUTS LIKE THIS HAVE BEEN MADE.
    Flag
  24. 324
    Name: Stephen Molyneux on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 325
    Name: Julia Walker on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 326
    Name: Michael J Thompson on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 327
    Name: Donna Cunningham on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments: A much needed service to keep the feel of the countryside on our doorstep with the back up of security and services by the wardens.
    Flag
  28. 328
    Name: Gordon Howe on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 329
    Name: Margaret Brade on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments: Support
    Flag
  30. 330
    Name: Katharine Cook on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 331
    Name: Jane Lawson on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments: These areas are really really important to local people. What will happen to them if there is no warden service? Who will look after them?
    Flag
  32. 332
    Name: Marc Roberts on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments: This is an essential service to maintain and build on biodiversity, which the council is committed to doing - so it says
    Flag
  33. 333
    Name: Saffron Grant on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 334
    Name: Ian Warburton on Mar 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 335
    Name: Mary R. Crumpton (neƩ Perkins) on Mar 12, 2013
    Comments: Madness! The wardens service must remain.
    Flag
  36. 336
    Name: Bernadette Lomas on Mar 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 337
    Name: Jonathan Harris on Mar 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 338
    Name: Diana Robertson on Mar 12, 2013
    Comments: i feel that the specialised skills and focus of the Mersey Valley Wardens, have been an invaluable resource for the users of the valley and the waterparks. This is used by locals and those from farther afield as part of the footpath and cycling network. The activities, advice and maintenance work co-ordinated by the Wardens has been resoundingly successful, and appreciated for many years. It is very easy to dismantle this sort of service, but almost impossible to reinstate in future, when the impact of its loss begins to be felt. I feel that Manchester City Council should explore every avenue to maintain the paid service, via business sponsorship, grant aid from charities, etc before taking the final decision
    Flag
  39. 339
    Name: Oliver Jones on Mar 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 340
    Name: Thomas Southworth on Mar 13, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 341
    Name: Paul Mckenna on Mar 13, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 342
    Name: Rosemary Taylor on Mar 14, 2013
    Comments: Not being technically minded I couldn't find this petition without the exact site.
    Flag
  43. 343
    Name: Louise Oliva on Mar 14, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 344
    Name: Poppy Mccoll on Mar 14, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 345
    Name: Bookmaring Service on Mar 15, 2013
    Comments: J2A3li Thanks for the post.Thanks Again.
    Flag
  46. 346
    Name: Social Bookmarks on Mar 15, 2013
    Comments: HMtO8h Really appreciate you sharing this article.Really thank you! Really Great.
    Flag
  47. 347
    Name: Maureen Glendinning on Mar 18, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 348
    Name: Martin Leyfield on Mar 21, 2013
    Comments: Disbanding the on site Warden service will cost more in the long run. Even if people do some Warden tasks as part of community service punishment it will still cost more to us tax payers in the long run. You risk litigation if there is an accident and your 'at your own risk etc' signs are subject to vandalism.
    Flag
  49. 349
    Name: Peter Brunt on Mar 21, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 350
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2013
    Comments: Manchester City Council shows scant regard for local residents and leisure users, not to mention the rich animal and plant life. By disbanding this service it is playing into the hands of those who will intimidate users, ride off road vehicles, set fires and fly tip.
    Flag

Page: « 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 »

Sponsored links