Signatures 1302 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ... 27 › »
-
751
Name: Roy Lewis on Jan 21, 2013Comments: another attempt to erradicate Christianity from the airwave the replacement programme is appallingFlag
-
752
Name: Matthew Pearson on Jan 22, 2013Comments: It would have been nice to have a proper farewell programme. Ths way this was done shows real disregard for the audience .Flag
-
753
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
754
Name: Kevin Laming on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
755
Name: Pat Hopkins on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Very sad that you are not supporting those most vulnerable, not least the elderly. Want to say in strongest terms that the decision is wrong and should be reversed.Flag
-
756
Name: Jenny Bromley on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Very retrograde step. Many of those I know agree that this is one of the worst decisions Radio 2 could take. I urge you to reconsider in the name of compassion and kindness.Flag
-
757
Name: Daisy Spurgeon on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Very sad day. Hope you will reconsider and give the elderly and shut-ins a rare opportunity to celebrate.Flag
-
758
Name: Mr & Mrs K & C Paskin on Jan 22, 2013Comments: This 'spiritual link' is for many a necessity that cannot be lost for if not there too what can they turn.Flag
-
759
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: The slot offered is the equivalent to deportation to Siberia. This is a very ill-disguised attempt to kill off the concept altogether by ensuring it has no audience.Flag
-
760
Name: F Graham Little on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Reason: Many older listeners will not be able to handle iPlayer, the BBC stated option. Could we not have a repeat at a 'normal' hour?Flag
-
761
Name: Brian Graham on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
762
Name: David Brown on Jan 22, 2013Comments: After a busy Sunday it's great to relax with Sunday Half Hour. 6am doesn't appear on my awake time as I'm a night owl.Flag
-
763
Name: Susan Lee on Jan 22, 2013Comments: 95% of the listening public will be asleep at 6am on a Sunday morning.Flag
-
764
Name: F.ROBINSON on Jan 22, 2013Comments: What a high-handed and arrogant attitude to say "Let them listen to it on i-pad." Let them eat cake, eh?Flag
-
765
Name: Sue Cobb on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
766
Name: Caroline Fleming on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
767
Name: Karen McCarthy on Jan 22, 2013Comments: The BBC is always broadcasting repeats. I assumed for economy reasons. Surely they could have left this little programme where it is. Many licence payers love it.Flag
-
768
Name: Karen McCarthy on Jan 22, 2013Comments: The BBC is always broadcasting repeats. I assumed for economy reasons. Surely they could have left this little programme where it is. Many licence payers love it.Flag
-
769
Name: Karen McCarthy on Jan 22, 2013Comments: The BBC is always broadcasting repeats. I assumed for economy reasons. Surely they could have left this little programme where it is. Many licence payers love it.Flag
-
770
Name: Lynda Mathers on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
771
Name: R E MONROE on Jan 22, 2013Comments: 6am is much too early for this important programme. There needs to be a Christian programme on Sunday eveningsFlag
-
772
Name: Helen Goodall on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Please retain this time of praise and song at 8 30 pm. To move it to 6 00 am is so impracticable for the vast majority of people, including those who for reasons of age and health are unable to get to a church service.Flag
-
773
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: It is most important that our Christian traditions are seen to be kepy unalteredFlag
-
774
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: One of the highlights of our weekend, The decision to axe SHH shows a disgraceful lack of respect, especially for elderly listeners.Flag
-
775
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: This decision takes the present loyal audience for granted and is incomprehensible.Flag
-
776
Name: William & Nancy Brakenbury on Jan 22, 2013Comments: The 6.00 a.m. slot is unsuitable for most people who would listen, especially the elderly and sick who rely on a Christian programme of this kind.Flag
-
777
Name: Lesley Smith on Jan 22, 2013Comments: If it were any other religion, you would be being accused of discrimination by civil liberties groups; Christianity counts as well, and we have no intention of seeing Britain become even more Godless than it is. 6am is a ridiculous time more a general broadcast, and not everyone has internet access. Perhaps the people who made this decision should stop worshipping the most modern technology, and start thinking about real people, especially their listeners.Flag
-
778
Name: Barbara Bainbridge on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
779
Name: Lucy Monroe on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
780
Name: Michael Humphries on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Not all Christians are awake at 6am., especially senior citizens!Flag
-
781
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
782
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: In support of a friend who sets great store by the programmeFlag
-
783
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: In support of a friend who sets great store by the programmeFlag
-
784
Name: Sylvia Smith on Jan 22, 2013Comments: very sad to loose 8.30pm slot regular listener now clashes with radio lincs. dawn chorus 6-7am please move have listened for years very sadFlag
-
785
Name: Josephine Loveridge on Jan 22, 2013Comments: SUNDAY HALF HOUR IS MARVELLOUS FOR PEOPLE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND A SERVICE OF WORSHIP, AND A REAL TONIC IN THIS DULL WORLDFlag
-
786
Name: Jan on Jan 22, 2013Comments: This slot is vital to people who work on Sundays and/or can't easily get to church. It means so much to a lot of folk. Please don't change the time. We need more accessible Christian programmes not less.Flag
-
787
Name: SHEILA OGDEN on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
788
Name: Roger And Margaret Cottrell on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
789
Name: Mary Sage on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Shame on the schedulers who have deprived many elderly listeners of their sunday evening enjoyment!Flag
-
790
Name: Diane Kutar on Jan 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
791
Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Older Folks love to listen to this programme and it is a comfort to those who are unable to get to ChurchFlag
-
792
Name: Bernard Gilhespy on Jan 22, 2013Comments: This has been the programme's home for the last 40 years. Why change it now ? A large number of older people will be disadvantaged and will not have access to I Player.Flag
-
793
Name: Geoffrey Sage on Jan 22, 2013Comments: Please keep this programme at a time that it can be heard!Flag
-
794
Name: Stuart Little on Jan 22, 2013Comments: This is an important programme for many listeners, many of whom will not have the technology nor the ability to use iPlayer and 6am will mean they miss out. Bad move.Flag
-
795
Name: Rose And Harry Parker on Jan 23, 2013Comments: We were very disappointed to hear what has happened. Why didn't you tell about these plans and get the audiences opinion.Flag
-
796
Name: Margaret Blyth on Jan 23, 2013Comments: Outrageous decison-not many people listen to radio at 6 am Sunday morning-? how many elderly people half i player or know what it isFlag
-
797
Name: Robert Bell on Jan 23, 2013Comments: Yet another instance of the daft decisions of the BBC we have come to expect. REVERSE ITFlag
-
798
Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013Comments: The proposed time to broadcast the revamped programme is totally unsuitable for many of the loyal listeners of Sunday Half Hour.Flag
-
799
Name: Margaret Carter on Jan 23, 2013Comments: The proposed change will sadden many old folk who do not get out and do not have the internet to use i-playerFlag
-
800
Name: David L Eades on Jan 23, 2013Comments: ^6am is another attempt to downgrade Christianity from prime time broadcasting, and has already been said many of the listeners are elderly and will not be up and around to listen at that timeFlag