Save Newsome Fields

Signatures 169 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 101
   Name: Kate Whitehead on Nov 19, 2012

   Comments: There is far too much brown field site going to waste to justify cramming even more pokey / cheap houses onto green belt sites. Green spaces should be left untouched for our future generations - not sold off to build ugly houses. Plus, our wildlife needs this space more than we do. We need to stop our ever-increasing population, rather than destroying natural habitat. If the benefits system looked at its ridiculous rules on shared-housing, then so many new houses wouldn't even be required!

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Julie Magson on Nov 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Valerie Shaw on Nov 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Gillian Kent on Nov 19, 2012

   Comments: Best to use other land in built up areas.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Valerie Broadhead on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Linda on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: I wholeheartedly agree with the petition.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Judith Brown on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: Consigning green fields to housing developments is lazy planning - there are plenty of decaying urban sites available. Our countryside is precious and fundamental to our communal well-being. Let's protect it!

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Ann Wear on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: There are lots of other areas of land that could be re-used instead of building on green sites.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: John Billingsley on Nov 21, 2012

   Comments: This seems entirely the wrong way to treat what could be Kirklees' prime archaeological site and attraction, Castle Hill, as well as semi-rural leisure location at a 'safe' distance from concentrated housing. Given the shambles over the Thandi proposals for the 'pub', surely it's time to leave the hill well alone and let it thrive in its agricultural landscape and archaeological context.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: MRS ANNE LLOYD on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: Thus are is a precious resource and should be treated as such for future generations.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Isobel Charles on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Ross Kardon on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Jane Simpson on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Liam McIntosh on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Amanda McIntosh on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Maisie McIntosh on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Emma Tatler on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Chris Bernard on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: keep it green

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Amy McIntosh on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Tracey Watson on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Damian Haigh on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Jane Haigh on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Simon Baxter on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: Castle HIll is the ladnmark of Huddersfield and the green area below a reserve for wildlife - it's a wonderful site when you see a kite just off the banking. we need to protect this space and the green backdrop Hudderfield can be so proud of

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Z, J & I Johnson on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Keith Barrow on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: Do we want to live in a concrete jungle. NO

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Susan Barrow on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Marc Layton-Bennett on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Anna Lomax on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Chris Lomax on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: I think that this proposal is quite disturbing and demonstrates the short-sightedness of the planners. I fully understand that we need more housing but fail to see the logic behind building on a green field site when so many brown field sites are just as suitable and a large number of properties lie neglected. We must remember what makes this town beautiful and that when we have lost these green spaces, there's no getting them back.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Anne And Lewis Martin on Dec 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: You have remarked very interesting points! ps nice web site. Christian Louboutin mens Christian Louboutin mens

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Peter O'Brien on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 14, 2012

    Comments: I AM CURRENTLY BEHIND A DEVELOPMENT OF 27 BED STUDENT ACCOMODATION, LET'S KEEP SOMETHING GREEN!!!!!

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Maureen Rawlinson on Dec 14, 2012

    Comments: It is important that we should get as many people as possible to sign up

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Brenda Davis on Dec 15, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 15, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Mike Holding on Dec 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Alan Hanson on Dec 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Maria Hanson on Dec 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: This area should remain green as an appropriate surrounding to Castle Hill itself and is if considerable landscape value as well as recreational value

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Anthony Hegney on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: This is a disgrace and before these idiots decide to build on this land they should consider the people's who's front door open on to this open field I will do every thing in my power to stop this happening. As I live into the field on new Laith hill at quarry house farm.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Anthony Hegney on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: This is a disgrace and before these idiots decide to build on this land they should consider the people's who's front door open on to this open field I will do every thing in my power to stop this happening. As I live into the field on new Laith hill at quarry house farm.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Glen Timmins on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: Strongly disagree with building in this geenbelt belt area, as you drive around huddersfield there are many empty and run down homes and buildings that could be converted updated.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: John Holmes on Dec 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Cathryn Burrow on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments: This corridor is essential to retain the individual localities of Newsome and Lowershouses. Development of this area would destroy these localities and make them part of the Huddersfield suburb.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Robert Giggle on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments: It is essential to keep this green corridor to prevent urban sprawl. The area also lacks amenities and already has an inadequate road infrastructure. There is also a huge gas main which runs through the middle of the site which the Council may not be aware of.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Graham A Smith on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments: Huddersfield is FULL. We should be trying to reduce the population of our town. There are no jobs and the infrastructure cannot cope. If you build on this land where will you build next time? You cannot keep expanding Huddersfield land is no longer being created. Get real!!!

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Stephen Robinson on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: Huddersfield cannot afford to loose any more greenfield areas. The loss of much of Grimscar valley over recent years and the proposed loss of more of Grimscar is a matter of great concern.

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Jayn Barker on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »