Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 353 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 »

  1. 151
    Name: DR.S.SIVAGNANASUNDARAM on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Save A&E UHL; I Strongly support for this petition
    Flag
  2. 152
    Name: Jacqueline Bold on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 153
    Name: Vivian Iguyovwe on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 154
    Name: Anu Shankar on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 155
    Name: Amit Soodan on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 156
    Name: Joanna Lawrence on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 157
    Name: Dr A Seresht on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 158
    Name: Dr Elizabeth Tang on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 159
    Name: Owen Greene on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 160
    Name: Ann Calder on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 161
    Name: Barbara Jacobs on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Retired G P principal 33years in Lewisham
    Flag
  12. 162
    Name: Zoe Davies on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 163
    Name: Ian MacDonagh on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 164
    Name: Rachael Tan on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 165
    Name: Keith Hertogs on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 166
    Name: Dr Sian Morgan on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 167
    Name: Nabil Salama on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Fully support this petition. Really surprised that we have to take such action given the clear flaws in the TSA process.
    Flag
  18. 168
    Name: Dr Michael Bannon on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 169
    Name: Lucy Baker on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 170
    Name: Shamali.hoque on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 171
    Name: Geraldine Fernando on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 172
    Name: Dr Magda Branker on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 173
    Name: Richard Johnston on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 174
    Name: DR M. ADESI on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: The closure of the A+E, UHL will narrow patient choice, lead to unneccessary hardships, jeopardise quality and safety and clearly a wrong impression to shut down a successful establishment for one neck deep in depth. Please reject this notion which is clearly wrong and unfair. Thanks.
    Flag
  25. 175
    Name: David Reffitt on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: I agree entirely with the comments in the petition above that it is extremely dangerous for patient care to close acute services including A & E and maternity which are extremely well served by Lewisham Healthcare Trust
    Flag
  26. 176
    Name: Dr Henry Munby on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: The propositions are not supported by solid evidence that they will improve quality of care or, indeed, the financial situation for either trust involved. th. the consultation process has been e
    Flag
  27. 177
    Name: Emma Johnston on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 178
    Name: Anastasia Rachmanidou on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 179
    Name: Elizabeth Aitken on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 180
    Name: Michael Peters on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 181
    Name: Syed M Rashid Azam on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 182
    Name: Dr David Sharpe on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 183
    Name: Sandeep Kapur on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 184
    Name: Dr Jean-Francois Benard on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 185
    Name: Dr Steve Pierpoint on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 186
    Name: B Hauee on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 187
    Name: Carol Cheal on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: The A&E department at Lewisham provides an excellent service to local people and underpins many of the other services in the trust. It would be extremely short-sighted and detrimental to close the department and I urge you to keep it open.
    Flag
  38. 188
    Name: Dr Paula O'Donnell on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: We, doctors in Lewisham, have grave concerns about the proposal to downgrade emergency medical and surgical services at Lewisham Hospital made by the Trust Special Administrator (TSA) for South London Healthcare NHS Trust. Lewisham Hospital is not part of that trust. It is a solvent, successful organisation that delivers high-quality care to its patients. Yet the TSA has taken the extraordinary view that Lewisham’s Accident and Emergency Department should close to admissions, leading to closure of acute services including full maternity services, and that most of the hospital site be sold. Emergency services are vital for the population of Lewisham, which contains some of the most deprived wards in England. Lewisham Hospital’s new £12 million A&E department opened as recently as April 2012 in response to the need for expanded services. The TSA’s report asserts that the need for emergency care would be reduced by 30% simply by providing more care in the community. However, there is simply no clinical evidence to back this up. In any case Lewisham Hospital has already been innovative in working with social services to provide more care at home and avoid admissions in patients with chronic illness. Our intensive care unit has excellent standardised mortality rates. Our new birthing centre has high maternal satisfaction and provides high-quality care to a community with a high proportion of ‘high risk’ births, which would be jeopardised if maternity services are lost or downgraded. Lewisham Hospital features in the top 40 hospitals in the CHKS rankings. It its acute services are lost, they could not be provided by others without risking patients' safety and quality of care. The TSA’s review fails the “four tests” that you and the Secretary of State for Health have recently laid down in Parliament. It does not have the backing of GPs. It does not have public support, as the demonstrations, public meetings and the petition have shown. It is not based on sound clinical evidence (detailed responses from groups of clinicians, including GPs, are at http://www.savelewishamhospital.com/). Even the report itself acknowledges that it will not improve patient choice. Your government's response to this report has an importance beyond Lewisham. The report is an attempted regional reconfiguration, tacked onto the statutory regime for an unsustainable provider, which is being used here for the first time ever. The report was drawn up to statutory timescales that are much too short for a considered reconfiguration, with the result that the clinical consultation is desultory and the clinical evidence is of poor quality. If this report is accepted as it stands, it will create a dangerous precedent for the rest of England. Furthermore, the TSA has produced a report which perversely recommends that a solvent and successful organisation be punished to save a separate, unsustainable provider. We doubt that this is a signal that you will want to send to the NHS and the public. We urge you and the Secretary of State for Health to reject the recommendation that Lewisham Hospital lose its A&E and acute services.
    Flag
  39. 189
    Name: Dr Liz Scotney on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 190
    Name: Andrew Warsop on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: The proposed downgrading of acute services at Lewisham Hospital is likely to put the people of Lewisham at increased risk of death and disease
    Flag
  41. 191
    Name: Tina Sajjanhar on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: I am in full support of the above statement
    Flag
  42. 192
    Name: Dr Ann Chu on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Save Lewisham Hospital. Strive for high quality patient care, patient choice and patient satisfaction.
    Flag
  43. 193
    Name: A.Mani-Babu on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Patients will be put under more stress and inconvenience to access emergency treatment if A&E at UHL closes.Patients likely to attend King's ,which will increase the flow and strain King's college Hopspital.
    Flag
  44. 194
    Name: Dr William Hare on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 195
    Name: Dr Aaminah Qureshi on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 196
    Name: Anna Clarke on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 197
    Name: Dr Marthin Mostert on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments: I fully agree with the content of this letter and urge the Prime Minister and Health Secretary to reject the TSA proposals for Lewisham Hospital.
    Flag
  48. 198
    Name: Dr Komron Sayyah on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments: The strides in developing working relationships between GPs and University Hospital Lewisham in recent years have been enormous with the projected outomes of improved healthcare for the large population base in this area at increasingly improved efficiency, To destroy this whole cooperative process with its obviously beneficial out comes to the local population at and patients is remarkable and with it will be a destruction of morale and good will in the local GP population. The presence of the A&E as a part of this whole process is absolutely essential. Change is always difficult, but change based on poor evidence and with little regard for those it affects is unacceptable and difficult to reconcile.
    Flag
  49. 199
    Name: Tamara Zerb on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 200
    Name: Olufunmi Kuforiji on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments: Closing acute services will be detrimental to our patients.
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 »

Sponsored links