Last minute changes to the Draft Local Plan (available from here: http://www.cherryburton.com/news/revised-housing-development-draft-local-plans) have been swept into the proposal during the busy August holiday season and relate to land at Manor Farm, Highgate (Site Reference CHER5/7). The change would mean the removal of a number of large existing farm buildings, replacing them with a new build of 22 houses crammed onto just 1 hectare of land.
This new proposal will have a major impact on our homes and everyday lives for those not just living on Highgate, but in the wider Cherry Burton community.
For Example:
• Increase in Flood Risk due to strain on already faltering village drainage system leading to potential local flooding
• Increase in noise pollution during and after works
• Decrease in already poor road safety due to increase in traffic during and after works, both on Highgate, throughout the village and at the busy Malton Road junction
• Increase in light pollution
• Change from a rural setting to new build zone
• Damage to the Conservation Area
• Further decline in populations of Bats, Barn Swallows, Tawny Owls and Barn Owls
Please log your objections here by the 30th September:
http://consult.eastriding.gov.uk/portal/forward_planning/allocations_dpd/majorchanges?pointId=1375360813232#section-1375360813232
And sign this online petition before the 27th September
1 year agoComments:
The market has "missed a tech boom" of sorts aerdaly, because the tech just hasn't generated revenues yet: that's my point.But that is the point. Pets.com could not generate any revenues but was given a ridiculous market cap because the Fed flooded the system with so much money it had to go somewhere. But that's how the market works, it can only count the money: it's not supposed to predict the future or measure stuff like "progress."Stuff like progress? Was it progress when Clinton/Grennspan/Bush conspired to get poor people with lousy credit histories to buy their own homes? Is it progress to have a derivative market that runs into a quadrillion dollars? Is it a true market when it is distorted and manipulated by central banks?If you think productivity gains are overrated, to what do you attribute graphs like this?Get rid of low value added jobs, replace labour with machinery and you get a chart just like that.Sure, part of it is just the lower-value stuff being offshored- though even that is partially driven by technology, whether computers driving logistics or better shipping tech- but most of those gains are obviously driven directly by tech.They are driven by reducing the numerator, which is labour. It is driven by the way you count the data. For example, Apple is not a manufacturing company but its products are counted in many of the categories that are being reported. On the whole aggregates may be good for arguing but are not as useful as you may think. http://wakazee.com odqtqvejq ztecdoqung
Lily, Japan
1 year agoComments:
Wow! I am so impressed by your phtoos and your ability to try so many more ideas Kelly put up on the forum than I did! I love the bathtub Elf tradition so cute! http://xpwbfemexd.com waekcordkf ubwthvbkx
1 year agoComments:
The market has "missed a tech boom" of sorts aerdaly, because the tech just hasn't generated revenues yet: that's my point.But that is the point. Pets.com could not generate any revenues but was given a ridiculous market cap because the Fed flooded the system with so much money it had to go somewhere. But that's how the market works, it can only count the money: it's not supposed to predict the future or measure stuff like "progress."Stuff like progress? Was it progress when Clinton/Grennspan/Bush conspired to get poor people with lousy credit histories to buy their own homes? Is it progress to have a derivative market that runs into a quadrillion dollars? Is it a true market when it is distorted and manipulated by central banks?If you think productivity gains are overrated, to what do you attribute graphs like this?Get rid of low value added jobs, replace labour with machinery and you get a chart just like that.Sure, part of it is just the lower-value stuff being offshored- though even that is partially driven by technology, whether computers driving logistics or better shipping tech- but most of those gains are obviously driven directly by tech.They are driven by reducing the numerator, which is labour. It is driven by the way you count the data. For example, Apple is not a manufacturing company but its products are counted in many of the categories that are being reported. On the whole aggregates may be good for arguing but are not as useful as you may think. http://wakazee.com odqtqvejq ztecdoqung
Lily, Japan
1 year agoComments:
Wow! I am so impressed by your phtoos and your ability to try so many more ideas Kelly put up on the forum than I did! I love the bathtub Elf tradition so cute! http://xpwbfemexd.com waekcordkf ubwthvbkx
Jhett, Czech Republic
1 year agoComments:
Your post captures the issue peeclftry!
Millie, France
1 year agoComments:
BS low - raiionaltty high! Really good answer!
Binod, United States
1 year agoComments:
An Obama nomination would ivompre Bloomberg's chances of winning as a third party candidate. Obama has a strong cult following for his populist message, but I doubt it will appeal to the broader population who may recognize that he is just a lot of hot air. The Democratic mass media are moving to take out McCain by looking for anything they can misrepresent. Bloomberg can use the change idea to his advantage by informing people that he has demonstrated he can produce change as Mayor of New York City rather than just talking about it like Obama. I suggest the message of those who support a Bloomberg candidacy should be want real change draft Bloomberg.
Erina, Russian Federation
1 year agoComments:
laws. My son is not married to me and yet I can place him on my incsuanre and check him out of Kindergarten and look at his medical records. My brother-in-law was never married and yet he has been held legally liable for supporting his out-of-wedlock son that he didn't even realize that he'd had. I note you have no answer for what will happen to Common Law case law once Marriage is legally defined to be whatever “feels good”. What are you talking about? You seem to be having an extremely odd reaction to someone that has said that the state should not be licensing marriages something that common-law marriages presuppose. Laws change all of the time. It used to be illegal for me to smoke marijuana in Colorado. Now it isn't. What happened to the case law?But let me be fair, what three really bad legal ramifications would occur because of SSM? You seem to just want to ignore the problems, declare the problem is Religion, and demand that the Religious (who seem to be the only ones actually thinking about the problem) surrender the field and let Marriage become a simple matter of Contract Law. You have a poor track record of interpreting what I seem to want.If we had what I wanted we would live in an Orthodox Christian nation and everyone would receive the sacrament of marriage in an Orthodox Christian church by an ordained Orthodox Christian priest. That is not, in fact, where I live and I suspect that you would object to living there.At any rate, marriage already is a simple matter of contract law. Even with common-law marriage (which for something that is already abolished in 41 states you seem to be very excited about) there is more to it than, Jack and Jill are legally considered married because they lived in the same house or apartment for four years while in college. “Ta-da! Problem solved!”. This is an example of your snarky attitude that brings out my worst nature. Ignoring, of course, that contract law has been a part of our strange new Marriage for some time now, in the form of “Prenuptial agreements”, and they certainly have not been treated like binding contracts in our courts. So what evidence exists argues against your “solution”. Once again, your being a lawyer places me at a disadvantage but from my view there is very little binding in the sense that you seem to mean about our laws. This is why we have courts, and courts of appeals, and a Supreme Court a court which even changes its mind about legal matters from time to time. An example is the 14th Amendment has been held by the Supreme Court (since the 1940s) to mean that not just the federal government, but the states themselves, are bound by the Bill of Rights. This was not the original intent but is the current outcome. This sort of thing happens all of the time in law. Laws are constantly being modified and even the US Constitution which is much more challenging to alter has been amended 27 times.
Paul & Helen Kenny, United Kingdom
1 year agoComments:
We are concerned about the proposed development for the following grounds:
The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the conservation area. Will have an adeverse affect on the residential amenity of the neighbours including many period proerties which directly front Highgate. The size of the development is inapproprate within the conservation area. Will lead to the removal of historic farm vehicles, increased traffic flow on a stretch of road which already has inadequate footpath provision and no physical restriction to prevent speeding vehicles.
