Stand Against Razor's Farm

Signatures 405 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »

1. 151
   Name: Carl Humphrys on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: Iam against this development for many reasons, none of which have Croudace been able to provide satiafactory answers/solutions.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Anna McGeough on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Christine Marsh on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: I oppose the develop because of the lack of services to be implemented and the amount of green site that is to used.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Sarah Hall on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: Please not more housing in this beautiful country side; we moved here to be in the country side!

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Rachel Kerwick on Dec 4, 2012

   Comments: Bramley resident.

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Paul Taylor on Dec 4, 2012

   Comments: Bramley has already suffered from over-development with no improvement in local facililties

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: David Henshall on Dec 4, 2012

   Comments: Primary concerns are the burdon on existing local facilities and schools, and increased traffic along Thornhill way for commuters connecting to A33 for Reading.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Geraint Thomas on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Chris Wright on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: I'm not against development of new homes, but what I am against is development in the wrong areas, at the wrong time. This is definitely the wrong place and the wrong time...

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Carol Lloyd on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: I have already protested this deveiopment direct to Croudace on the very same reasons as listed on this petition. The main answer i got was 'we are giving money to the council to spend on education'!! no consideration seems to be given to local objections from people who live here and KNOW the impact this will have on the area.

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Maggie Wardle on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Greig Lloyd on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Stuart Lyon on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: To many houses are being built in the area, enough is enough !

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Corinna Latter on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: Too many houses in the area. The roads are not built for it. It's bad enough and dangerous enough as it is without more traffic. Plus building on forestry and fields is a tragedy!

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Nigel Haines on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Christine Haines on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Jodie Carroll on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: David Smith on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Garry Ward on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: I fully support the reservations outlined by SARF.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: William McVey on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Lily McVey on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Hayley Watts on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: George Blower on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Duncan McCombe on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Ian Bryant on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Russell Crowe on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: I don;t feel the current or planned future infastructure can support this amount of new homes and families, also the A33 is appauling as it is and would definitley not cope with the amount of extra local traffic, let alone the local roads in and around the Sherfield park and Cufaude lane and Chinham area.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Philip Lewis on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Heather Pocock on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: We can't take anymore building, there are not the facilities for a large influx of people and traffic. Cufaude lane is only a narrow country lane.

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Nik Langrish-Dixon on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: I object to the additional traffic and pressure on the local amenities

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Jenny Ridgley on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: There will not be enough facilities eg. Doctors, School & Hospital. Extra traffic through Bramley.to Tadley/Basingstoke.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Diane Lee on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: It seems the developers want to make a profit at the expense of the environment and without any consultation with locals. What grounds is the council or developers justifying the need for this housing to be located here? Already there's increased traffic to the area, with some flooding problems and more importantly if this were to go ahead this would ruining the character of the area and have a harmful impact to green belt.

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Matthew Price on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Matthew Stiff on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Tina Mistry on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: the lack of local amenities ie shop, gp, school already causes problems for the existing SP residents! Let alone more pressure from

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Matthew Bailey on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: Chineham can not withstand any additional houses. The local schools are already FULL so where are the children in these additional 480 houses expected to go?

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Jeremy Haworth on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: No more greenfield/countryside housing. Stop the breeding and the importation.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Kelly Long on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Tracey Charlton on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: proposed roads will be used as a rat run from the a33 through Chineham and cause chaos

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Louisa Eason on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Mrs PA Oats on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Philip Wilton on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: Chineham is already too big we do not have room for any more development, the infrastructure is not and will not be in place to suport any more building.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Emma Apsey on Dec 4, 2012

    Comments: think of the wildlife... humans are too selfish. we can't keep building... we are taking away habitats for other living creatures too

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »