San Quentin Inmates\' Mail must not be neglected!

Signatures 494 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »

1. 151
   Name: Janet E. Peterson-Bryan on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Ann Hardy on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Joachim Kuebler on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Cathy Stokes on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Betty Hampton on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments: I am a mother of an inmate at another prison,and my son experience the same things and i definitely disagree with the way inmates are treated whether they are on death row .they should be able to keep in touch their families.this is cruel and inhuman.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments: I fully support the above petition.

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Gerda Van Der Heyde on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments: I have a friend at SQ who will have his warrant signed as soon as they will start executing again, it's devastating and cruel that mail takes so long.

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Elizabeth McDermott on Apr 30, 2008

   Comments: The inmates deserve to receive their mail in a timely manner.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Beverley Walter on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Liefeith on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Teresa M. Ysunza on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Daniel Jentsch on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Amanda Martinez on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: Who can deny the fact that cutting off the only contact they have with anyone who cares about them will do nothing but make the situation even worse, not just for the inmate but for EVERYONE connected to him Title 15 encourages correspondence. You would think they'd try to make it possible since they obviously support it. I truly hope that this problem is resolved as quickly as possible and these inmates start receiving their mail in a much more timely manner.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Lincoln Martinez on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Trey Martinez on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Luis Pacheco on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: That situation must end.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Kirstie on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Garrick on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Julien Ball on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: April Heller on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Aune Vähäkangas on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Stacy Cramer on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Debra Sabah Press on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Jenny Chutes on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Samantha O'Kelley on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: This has happened on more than one occasion!

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: David Freeman on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Wendy Alsford on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Ruby on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: I support this immates complaint. that mail shall be issued to the inmate as soon as possible, but not later than seven calendar days from receipt of the mail from the Post Office at the facility.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Erika Street on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Jessie McCormick on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Catherine Shook on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: INMATES ARE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE THEIR MAIL IN A TIMELY MANNER.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Neil Morrison on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments: If as many as one in six of those convicted are actually innocent it is intolerable that all are subjected to such shameful treatment.

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Millie Barnet on May 1, 2008

    Comments: I believe this letter says it all and I am in full agreement. There is no excuse for prisoners to be hassled; there is no excuse for friends and families of prisoners to be punished.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Kathleen on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Jessica Parker on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Pelois Emmanuelle on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Alessandra on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: COLIN AMERY on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Ingrid Gassner on May 1, 2008

    Comments: I FULLY AGREE!!!

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Eerika Häyrinen on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Heidi Uetz-Sterling on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Niedermann Vanessa on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Anonymous on May 1, 2008

    Comments: Power to the PPL

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Christa Dold on May 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Donna Ryan on May 1, 2008

    Comments: I've been writing to guys in SQ for the last five years and have never known the mail be so slow. These guys are in prison for a reason. Yes we have established that. But it doesn't give anyone else the right to further punish them.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »