Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 101 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

  1. 1
    Name: Kazu Domae on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Bill Sitkin on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Eric Karlstrom on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Having been involved with this Lexam issue since our community first learned of it, I agree with all the concerns listed here. The bottom line is that the water resource here and the pristine nature of our San Luis Valley are much too valuable and too fragile for us to allow the oil/gas industry to despoil that piece of land/water that our creator has put under our protection. We as good stewards must try to act responsibly to protect our homeland from foreign invasion and desecration.
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Eric Karlstrom on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Having been involved with this Lexam issue since our community first learned of it, I agree with all the concerns listed here. The bottom line is that the water resource here and the pristine nature of our San Luis Valley are much too valuable and too fragile for us to allow the oil/gas industry to despoil that piece of land/water that our creator has put under our protection. We as good stewards must try to act responsibly to protect our homeland from foreign invasion and desecration.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Eric Karlstrom on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Having been involved with this Lexam issue since our community first learned of it, I agree with all the concerns listed here. The bottom line is that the water resource here and the pristine nature of our San Luis Valley are much too valuable and too fragile for us to allow the oil/gas industry to despoil that piece of land/water that our creator has put under our protection. We as good stewards must try to act responsibly to protect our homeland from foreign invasion and desecration.
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Beth Richman on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Lorain Fox Davis on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: A Refuge is a sanctuary. By definition it must be protected. I add my voice to this petition, to this plea that you protect this precious Wildlife Refuge.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Mona Winfrey on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Roxane De La Roche on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Stuart Allen on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: William Howell on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Let us stop this drilling to make money no matter the consequences approach. Let us primarily focus on the earth and the water and the air and the people who live here.
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: William Howell on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Let us stop this drilling to make money no matter the consequences approach. Let us primarily focus on the earth and the water and the air and the people who live here.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: George Gers on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Though registered to vote in Gunnison, I own property in the Baca and believe Saguache County can do better than exploration/drilling development.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Charry Stover on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Michael Sullivan on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: M. Esther Grant on Nov 15, 2007
    Comments: Although Lexam owns the mineral rights - there are ways that the County Commissioners can require stringent permits that will assure that water, air, and noise quality is maintained.
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Sheila Ramsey on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Cindy Pearson on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: My children, and many more, travel up and down this only road in and out of Crestone Mon. thru Fri. The idea of allowing them to travel on this road with continuous heavy truck traffic and toxic waste is unthinkable. We will probably MOVE!! if this occurs.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: William Porter on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: David Nicholas on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Cathy Amenta on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Kizzen Laki on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Matthew Crowley on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Angela Bradshaw on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: Please do not drill.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Stacey McCulloch on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Steven LeBlanc on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: I am concerned that this drilling and gas operation is much more than is claimed by the oil company. This land is pristine and should be protected.
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Shinanne Shisana on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: David G Davis on Nov 17, 2007
    Comments: Is it possible to believe that after drilling through 14,000 feet of pristine and then piercing the earth's crust looking for volatile, poisonous minerals that zero contamination of that aquifer will happen Lexam needs to have a bond or penalty clause to pay for the immanent contamination of Earth, air, water and the lives and property of all who are affected adversly by this proposed action. That includes everyone downstream dependent on the Rio Grande. While they own mineral rights one must ask what right does that give to contaminate anything let alone an entire ecosystem. One need only look at what has happened in Rifle, La Veta and Trinidad to see the handwritting on the wall. Once contaminated the aquifer is dead or dying. Is money our only value Water is life and the amount of good clean water in this country and in the world is evaporating rapidly. Soon we will see wars fought over water more than resources like energy. Look around, it's already happening
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Anrahyah Arstad on Nov 17, 2007
    Comments: I hope that you are working for us and for the beautiful place we all call home
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Francelia Sevin on Nov 17, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Naomi Mattis on Nov 17, 2007
    Comments: please attend to our community's concerns. please align with health and quality of life as the greatest priority, before convenience and money. thank you.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: John R. M. Day, M.D. on Nov 17, 2007
    Comments: Drilling for oil in ths refuge will have severe negative impact on the aquifer, the ecology of plants and animals, and the health of the local people. It must not be allowed to happen. Respectfully, JRM Day.
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Kirsten Schreiber on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments: please hear the concerns of us people in this Valley!
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Steven Elliott on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments: please hear the concerns of us people in this Valley!
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Linda Spade on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments: The destruction of our drinking water supply and our invaluable aquifer is not worth two weeks supply of natural gas when already alternative energy sources are being developed-Sun Edison.
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Kathleen Haas on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Frank Mark Fink on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Kathy Mills on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments: We are going the right direction in the valley with solar - why would we reverse all that good and costly work There may be a small population there now but ANY population should be important.
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Estrella Alvarado on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Holly Thomas on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments: The refuge is an island of beatuy in our increasingly developed Colorado. From a practical standpoint the access is inappropropriate. By Designating the Valley as Green Zone, livlihood for far more than the limited funds to a few will develop, as this designatio will attract more people to live in the valley and businesses approapriate to the Valey. thanks you for your time Holly
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Catherine Hollander on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Milton Buddy Frank IV on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: John And Lori Karhu on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Malcolm Moore on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Elisabeth DesMarais on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments: May sanity and foresight prevail in this sensitive and pristine land. May wildlife reserves everywhere actually serve wildlife.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Robert Anger on Nov 21, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3

Sponsored links