Act now. Safety in WI State Parks is Threatened. Act 168

Signatures 3753 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 76 › »

1. 201
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: THERE IS NO COMPLETELY SAFE HUNTING.

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Dustin Vande Zande on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Bernadette Cassata on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: This bill effectively prevents all non-hunters from enjoying the state parks for 9 months of the year. It will make the parks a game preserve supported by our tax dollars

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Debbie Ninfo on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: i would be afraid to use the state parks during any hunting season. I won't even walk a nearby trail that is next to a gun club. It scares me and freaks out my animals. There is no valid reason to open State parks to hunting 9 months of the year. Please recind this.

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Mary Theisen on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: please rethink hunting as a 7 month season in parks that have many no hunting users during the year

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Ness VanDeWeghe on Dec 7, 2012

   Comments: Tis indeed a very sad, sad world we live in when persons supposedly 'in charge' (DNR?) of the so called "stewardship" of our state lands (?), will favor and support blood-money from hunters (as well as the killing of beautiful animals in these lands) to fund their organizations over the safety, protection and accessibility of said lands to ALL people because the land belongs to no one but should be enjoyed by everyone!

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Greg Pieper on Dec 7, 2012

   Comments: Thank you.

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Ginger LaBelle-Brown on Dec 7, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: Katherine Westover on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Hunters have access to 99% of public land in WI already. Only 10% of our population hunts. Leave the remaining 1% of the public land for the 90% who do not hunt but enjoy other outdoor activities.

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: ELLEN DEMERS on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Alex Fulton on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: Michael McFadzen on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Jon Young on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Greg Bohn on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Debra Sypek on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Judie Pfeifer on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: I'm against hunting and trapping regard to safety of other users in state parks.

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Mark Sharon on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: Joel Patenaude on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Act 168, regarding expanded seasons for where and when hunting and trapping will take place, does not include many cross-country skiing, mountain biking and hiking trail systems or popular rock climbing spots within "designated use areas." The plan also does not take not account the danger of stray bullets crossing trails or traps ensnaring pets, children and adults walking off trails to explore, orienteer or geocache. The need to keep these varied user groups from coming into conflict with one another deserves more consideration and planning than it was given before Act 168 was signed into law.

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: Linda Hoehne on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Please reconsider the expansion of hunting in our State parks. Keep them safe for everyone, including the animals! Wisconsin has plenty of private and public lands for hunters to pursue their interest, keep the state parks for others to pursue theirs! Thank you!

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: John Rasmussen on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Charlie Dee on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: J Spalding on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Please don't allow any more wildlife impact along state hiking trails from hunting. I've seen bored hunters shooting at songbirds songbirds because there is no longer any game species due to overhunted conditions already prevalent

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: LAURA LEE on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Public parks are for "the enjoyment of the people" - not for wearing blaze orange!

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: Linda Mittnacht on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Joe Hoida on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: this does not promote safety or encourage the use of the parks by our residents

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: keep the state parks safe for recreational users!

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Sherry Tarantino on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: Don't limit access for 90% of the public for the 10% of people in Wisconsin who hunt. If you are going to allow hunting in Wisconsin State Parks the term should be shorter than seven months.

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: David Guse on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: David Alley on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Sandy Brown on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Kelly Swingen on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Susan Engberg on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: All parks, State, County and City, are Common year-round areas. Giving hunting access to a very small minority is a violation of the rights and safety of all taxpayers.

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: PJ Smith on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: Karen Cruz on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Dan Schneider on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Mark Ollinger on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: Mark Janetski on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: Gregory J Voskuil on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: No hunting in or around state parks ever.

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: Kristen Hook on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: Anita Temple on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: if this plan is enacted I will not be buying a state park sticker! it is just not worth therisk!

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Diane Schwartz on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Patrick Bader on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: Diane Czerwonka on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 76 › »