Amend Rube Goldberg Project

The function of an outside project is to teach students concepts that they would not learn as effectively in a classroom. The Rube Goldberg project, as with any class assignment, must therefore be judged not by whether or not students learned, but by whether or not it was the most effective way for students to learn, over the time period required for completion. Though parts of the Rube Goldberg Project provide valuable learning experiences, they are concentrated in the initial thought process behind the design, and the final explanation of each step and its energy transfers. The majority of the work put into the project is involved in building, a process that can easily take more than 20 hours, especially for Physics 1A students. This entire portion of the project relies less upon principles of physics than trial and error, and can be enormously stressful, especially for students with little building experience. Though some principles of physics do become clearer as they are experimented with in the real world, so much time and energy is involved that the net project cannot be considered completely valuable. The Rube Goldberg Project, as well as the Solar Power Project, would be far more legitimate if taken out of the context of a Physics 1 class, which is often taken during junior year. 11th grade is the last full year students have to build a resume for post-high school life, and many students have extremely tight schedules, not to mention a full class schedule


Jess Brooks, Palo Alto High School Junior


No comments yet.

join the discussion

Recent signatures

  • username

    Allison ColemanUnited States

    7 years ago
  • username

    Nicki HwangUnited States

    7 years ago
  • username

    William WagnerUnited States

    7 years ago
See more

Petition highlights

There are no highlights yet.