NTEU RMIT BRANCH PETITION

Signatures 230 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 1
   Name: Jeanette Pierce on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments: Test

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Steve Horton on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments: 1

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: J.L. Harland on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Sandra Uitdenbogerd on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Meredith Seaman on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Sara Charlesworth on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: I am outraged at the complete lack of transparency regarding the employment of new RMIT Union staff. Not only were PD's not developed in conjunction with any real staff representation, applicants where informed that PD's where changed on the day of interview for a few short-listed applicants. Disgraceful. To top this, staff where at the mercy of the "interview" panel, subjected one applicant to over 1 and 1/2 hours interview - all this for a $40k role...methinks that they need to get over themselves! I beleive elected staff representatives play a signficant role in a capacity that benefits both parties. 1. A fair and impartial advocate ensuring transparency in the process along with 2. Pulling the organisation up when its about to disregard policy and negotiate a better way forward and adherence to process...tough job, who'd want to do it but what's worse is what the hell are we going to do without them

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anna White on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Meredith Kidby on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: My position at RMIT has recently been made redundant on the basis of a Business case that I believe was poorly researched, opinion-based and lacked real evidence. RMIT has devolved HR and workplanning processes and procedures to individual areas such as Portfolios, but has failed to set checks in place to ensure that these are being carried out. Existing HR and workplanning already lacks transparency and management accountability. 'Spill and Fill' approaches need no further encouragement - as far as I can see they are currently being used in many areas of RMIT. As a staff member faced with redundancy, I found I had no protection, because standard HR and workplanning procedures have never been followed properly in the five years I have been at RMIT. RMIT is not facing the realities of the situation and will be making a major mistake in the changes proposed to the General Staff Transition Guidelines and in the new Recruitment and Selection policy.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: John Terrell on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Pj Radcliffe on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: Many changes at RMIT have been well thought out, but alas some changes hinder corporate goals and hurt staff. The consultation process is a vital step in change management and helps ensure any change makes sense and effected staff have an input.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Heather Fraser on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: These changes are appalling.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Ed Yates on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Patricia Darwish on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: Words fail me - RMIT should be well placed because of the quality and dedicated general and academic staff - however because of this unnecessary and counter productive meddling RMIT continues to sink as morale and productivity of staff is undermined.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Ramon Lobato on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: James Higgins on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: As one of the AVS staff currently affected by forced transition into IT (something which I strongly object too) I am behind this campaign. Being 65 now I believe that within 3 months of transition I will be "out the door"

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Robyn Phillips on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Lois Roberts on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: I'm new to this organisation and proud to belong. But I don't want to belong to a right-wing conservative organisation that doesn't have principles values or care about people. I want to belong to a forward thinking proactive progressive and compassionate organisation. Please amend your practices to reflect this.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: E63646 on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments: The University is simply bypassing the union on any SHONKY regulation they wish to introduce. They are on the path to declaring the union redundant.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Jenni Bell on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Mary Serafim on Feb 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »