Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 775 total

Page: « 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 16 »

  1. 251
    Name: Karen Lee on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 252
    Name: Conrad Nobert on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 253
    Name: Sheleena Boulianne on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 254
    Name: Jordan Veldhuisen on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 255
    Name: Kirsten Proulx on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 256
    Name: Ariel Veldhuisen on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 257
    Name: Melanie Johnson Bugera on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 258
    Name: Jennifer Nguyen on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 259
    Name: Katrina Foster on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 260
    Name: Kathryn Joel on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 261
    Name: Keely Scott on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 262
    Name: Mary Day on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 263
    Name: Joanne Koopmans on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 264
    Name: Cynthia Fuhrer on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: with proper care and restrictions on numbers, habitat enclosures, etc, residents should be allowed to harvest their own eggs. Maybe paying a $25-$30 licensing or registration fee with evidence of proper enclosure and knowledge of care??
    Flag
  15. 265
    Name: Ronda Metszies on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 266
    Name: Leanne Kingsbury on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 267
    Name: Mike Joohnson on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: Animals are essential in creating a delicate and balanced ecosystem. not allowing people to raise thier own food and learn where food comes from is denying them thier rights of access to food, and a better quality of live and increase thier own health. By mandating that all food needs to be put through mega farms only divorces the individual from thier food, and puts there health at risk. I strongly encourage you to consider allowing this exemption, and make edmonton a better place to live.
    Flag
  18. 268
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 269
    Name: Matthew Luke on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: If your allowed pigeons, you should be allowed chickens.
    Flag
  20. 270
    Name: Sandie Hay on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 271
    Name: Chris Price on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 272
    Name: Lisa Lunn on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 273
    Name: Michael Hingston on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 274
    Name: Angela Wilson on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 275
    Name: Vikki Wiercinski on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 276
    Name: Tamsin Shute on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 277
    Name: Paul Samboryk on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: Would love to be able to do this in the city!
    Flag
  28. 278
    Name: Jacqueline Babey on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 279
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: I sincerely hope that this bylaw will change. It can only better our community.
    Flag
  30. 280
    Name: Donna Johnson on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: I completely support chickens in Edmonton's backyards. I wouldn't want to allow roosters though.
    Flag
  31. 281
    Name: Donna Johnson on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: I completely support chickens in Edmonton's backyards. I wouldn't want to allow roosters though.
    Flag
  32. 282
    Name: Arinna Grittani on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: Farm fresh eggs, all the time, without the cost! yes please!
    Flag
  33. 283
    Name: Monica Maddaford on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 284
    Name: Christopher Heffley on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: In Forbes magazine's top 10 cities to live in the US, 7 of the 10 cities allow the keeping of chickens. something to consider for a fairly conservative magazine.
    Flag
  35. 285
    Name: Julie Yerex on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 286
    Name: Trisia Eddy on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 287
    Name: Kellie Menard on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 288
    Name: Sean MacQueen on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 289
    Name: Lana Bilokon on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 290
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 291
    Name: Rhonda Heft on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: To prevent large scale poultry operations, limiting the number allowed would be beneficial in community relations, as far less complaint would be heard about farms in the city, etc. Small scale family supply would be ideal.
    Flag
  42. 292
    Name: Ted Koopmans on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 293
    Name: Kevin Sisk on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: it's just a good idea
    Flag
  44. 294
    Name: Netta Johnson on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments: How great it would be if we could legally keep hens in the city! Netta
    Flag
  45. 295
    Name: Melissa St. Dennis on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 296
    Name: Jon Bakker on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 297
    Name: Annand Ollivierre on Mar 29, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 298
    Name: Michael Moore on Mar 30, 2012
    Comments: We shouldn't even have to battle this issue. Back yard chickens are part of our heritage and are not a health risk. In Calgary where I used to live in Sunnyside there are hundreds of pigeons living all throughout the neighbourhood but there is no bylaw officer going around capturing them and ridding the neighbourhood of unhealthy birds. Food security is a right for all Canadians.
    Flag
  49. 299
    Name: Tom Depner on Mar 30, 2012
    Comments: there's chicken's at city hall,why can't I have a couple of my own
    Flag
  50. 300
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 16 »

Sponsored links