Signatures 652 total
-
1
Name: Susan Pagett on Jul 7, 2010Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Richard Pagett on Jul 7, 2010Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Mrs Jane R. Smith on Jul 8, 2010Comments: This proposed development has no advantage for Purton Parish. It will however have many disadvantages which will impinge on the life of the residents. Extra housing, for the almost city sized Swindon should be in the borough of Swindon. It has space, infrastructure, better public transport and job possibilities for the residents of new housing.Flag
-
4
Name: Sheila Fowler on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Michael Dixon on Jul 8, 2010Comments: There is no need for substantial housing development in open country. Use brownfield sites.Flag
-
6
Name: Gordon Hall on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Janet Fisher on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Robert Miles on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Brian E Atfield on Jul 8, 2010Comments: It is imperitive that we prevent the urban sprawl and its inadaquate infrastructure fron swallowing up the small towns and villages and distroying the quality and ambiance of the lives of its residence. To prevent this from accurring there is the requirment to impose a greenbelt or buffer zone which will prevent any such coalescence.Flag
-
10
Name: Mark Ponting on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Emma Ponting on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Neil Miles on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Mary Nettleton on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Arthur Chapman on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Regina Chapman on Jul 8, 2010Comments: The road infrastructure in the area does not support such a development.Flag
-
16
Name: Helen Dixon on Jul 8, 2010Comments: In addition to the above reasons the traffic levels in Purton are already very high with the landfill site now fulfilling a regional role and the household recycling centre being used by Swindon residents as well as the people from the local area. A significant amount of traffic also comes from the people who live on the North Swindon development as well as the buses and cars that come into the village to the comprehensive school . Short of knocking down half the High Street little can be done to alter the main road through the village and significant improvement would have to be made to the railway bridge. Such changes would totally destroy the character of the village!Flag
-
17
Name: John Harman on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Stella Grimes on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Mrs Margaret McIvor on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Clive Wilce on Jul 8, 2010Comments: Coalescence with small settlements of the size of Purton is unacceptable. The charatcer and community of this small settlement will be destroyed forever. It is important that this community retains its individual identity. Reinstate the rural buffer Swindon is a water stressed area with 80% of its water requirements imported from Oxford. Any further development will increase the need for additional water and is not sustainable.Flag
-
21
Name: Godfrey Fowler on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: David Tetlow on Jul 8, 2010Comments: The "fear" of the towns and villages around Swindon being swallowed up by an Urban expansion around Swindon was the common unifying factor in the creation of the Wootton Basset and Cricklade Community Area. This development will lead to coalescence as well as creating nothing but further problems to the outlying villages and Towns.Flag
-
23
Name: Francis Sheppard on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Jane Stephens on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Sandra Horsnall on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: F Dernie on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Miriam A Saunders on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: C A Morley on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Ian Marsh on Jul 8, 2010Comments: The points raised in the objections need to be addressed.Flag
-
31
Name: Chr on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Tracey Butler on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Evelyn Ann Booy on Jul 8, 2010Comments: I agree with all the aboveFlag
-
34
Name: Paul Booy on Jul 8, 2010Comments: above says it allFlag
-
35
Name: Ernest R Saunders on Jul 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Jul 8, 2010Comments: I despair of this country, those in power won't be happy until it's all concreted over ! :-(Flag
-
37
Name: Andrew Riddett on Jul 9, 2010Comments: In addition to opposing thsi scheme I particuarlalry believe the the rural buffer should be reinstated.Flag
-
38
Name: Bob Jones on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: David Sweet on Jul 9, 2010Comments: The infrastructure of Purton will not take any more housing of the size at Ridgeway Farm. This type of mass construction should be stopped.Flag
-
40
Name: Denise Crosland on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Mrs Dorothy Avenell on Jul 9, 2010Comments: How much longer have we to put up with mass desicration of the countryside & its inhabitants. How much longer do we have to put up with developers dictating to goverment what should be going on? How much longer do welisten to so called officials who have never set foot in our shire telling us this is what you will have/ When will you realize that filling our country with concrete will not solve anything.Flag
-
42
Name: Stephen Paul Minihan on Jul 9, 2010Comments: As with previous proposals the infrastructure is unable to accommodate such a large development, housing is currently available in the area and has been for some considerable time. Why not use the soon to be vacant RAF Lyneham site?Flag
-
43
Name: GrahamPrice on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: G.Quincey on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Sarah Woodwark on Jul 9, 2010Comments: Impact on wildlife in the areaFlag
-
48
Name: Anonymous on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Barbara Wilce on Jul 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Marion Hobbs on Jul 9, 2010Comments: I wonder why this development is being proposed at a time when there are other developements in the Swindon area on hold due to the credit crunch?Flag