Signatures 109 total
-
1
Name: Terence Boylan on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Robert Stone on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Anonymous on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Kathy Sheppard on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Andrew Sheppard on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Christopher Lipscomb on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Monique Segarra on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Carmine DeGennaro on Dec 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Geraldine Laybourne on Dec 23, 2008Comments: There are very few hamlets left in the United States that have the character of Rhinecliff.Flag
-
11
Name: Richard Creed on Dec 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Elizabeth Spinzia on Dec 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Elizabeth Spinzia on Dec 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Melissa Cohen on Dec 26, 2008Comments: This is completely unacceptableFlag
-
15
Name: Carolyn Marks Blackwood on Dec 26, 2008Comments: This is unconscionable !!!Flag
-
16
Name: Jane Brady on Dec 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Alfred Wenhardt on Dec 27, 2008Comments: To the Board you suckFlag
-
18
Name: Pat McLaughlin on Dec 27, 2008Comments: Owner bought at 5 not .56!Flag
-
19
Name: Cynthia Philip on Dec 27, 2008Comments: The entire process of review has been hurriedly pushed through and, it seems, geared to times when people might be on vacation -- August - for instance or to other significant events, such as the hearing that took place the same evening as the evening of the last presidential candidate debate. I was present at the meeting at which the schedule was set and the planning lawyer especially hired to guide the town through the review process was strongly against such a tight schedule but was overruled. This was the meeting that was held in the basement of the town hall at which the plan was presented to the Town Board. There is very little seating in that room, only four people attended the preponderance of the meeting. No formal provision was made for them to voice their opinion. This hardly seems to be transparent government.Flag
-
20
Name: Cynthia Philip on Dec 27, 2008Comments: The entire process of review has been hurriedly pushed through and, it seems, geared to times when people might be on vacation -- August - for instance or to other significant events, such as the hearing that took place the same evening as the evening of the last presidential candidate debate. I was present at the meeting at which the schedule was set and the planning lawyer especially hired to guide the town through the review process was strongly against such a tight schedule but was overruled. This was the meeting that was held in the basement of the town hall at which the plan was presented to the Town Board. There is very little seating in that room, only four people attended the preponderance of the meeting. No formal provision was made for them to voice their opinion. This hardly seems to be transparent government.Flag
-
21
Name: Alison Vaccarino on Dec 27, 2008Comments: Public Comments Please!Flag
-
22
Name: Alison Vaccarino on Dec 27, 2008Comments: Public Comments Please!Flag
-
23
Name: Michael Trimble on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Paula Wolf Trimble on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Nora Kindley on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: MARY DUNNE on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Dec 27, 2008Comments: I agree with the idea that more should be discussed with tax paying residents of Rhinecliff and Rhinebeck before this zoning measure.Flag
-
28
Name: Wheelock Whitney III on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: John Garland on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Stefano Ferrari on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Marisa P Driscoll on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Margaret De Wys on Dec 27, 2008Comments: I am a Rhinecliff resident. I am against Holy Cross zoning for 200 houses. I demand the decision be suspended until there is a public hearing.Flag
-
33
Name: May Lum on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Laura Battle on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Anonymous on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Sandra Bartlett on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Grace Gunning on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Rosemary Fox on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Josh Aronson on Dec 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Janet Stetson on Dec 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: John G Keene on Dec 28, 2008Comments: I feel it is inappropriate for the Town Board to make major changes in the use of area lands without public input. The Town Board represent the members of the community, not themselves. It is their responsibility to do the wishes of the community. In order to do that, they must get input from the community.Flag
-
42
Name: John Habich on Dec 28, 2008Comments: 367 River RoadFlag
-
43
Name: Lawrence C N Laybourne on Dec 28, 2008Comments: My wife and I are currently building in Rhinecliff. The stealth enactment of code extensions is shameful and unlawful. Public comment is essential.Flag
-
44
Name: Sharon Sherrod on Dec 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Jennifer LaBelle on Dec 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Ross Shain on Dec 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Ross Shain on Dec 28, 2008Comments: Rhinecliff home ownerFlag
-
48
Name: Colin DeVries on Dec 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Linnea Welker on Dec 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Mary Irish on Dec 29, 2008Comments:Flag