| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 251 | Ruth Abraham | people who expose the plight of asylum seekers ahould be supprted and praised, not punished |
| 252 | André Borges de Carvalho | |
| 253 | Richard Scrase | The action of salford university is contrary to the founding ideals of university eduation - those of free speech, truth, openess. |
| 254 | Prof Mike Jempson | |
| 255 | Anonymous | I fully support Rhetta Moran in her campaign to persuade salford University to drop its application for costs to the Employment Tribunal.
As someone who has represented applicants in similar circumstances, I know that these cases are not embarked upon lightly by ex-employees and, although the tribunals themselves make every effort to put anyone representing themselves at ease, it can still be a traumatic experience.
Such tribunals are, effectively, courts of law with powers and authority backed up by statute.
Salford's decision smacks of retribution and they must be desisted fron this course of action in this case. |
| 256 | Monika Vykoukal | |
| 257 | Anonymous | |
| 258 | David Collett | |
| 259 | Darren Pipe | |
| 260 | steve Cohen | |
| 261 | M B Ali | Applying for costs will discourage individuals from testing their cases in court. |
| 262 | Jason Gerard | Awful behaviour |
| 263 | Sonia Thompson | I'm saddened that such a large organsation would find it reasonable to operate in this way against one individual seeking to ensure that her views and opnions are aired. This sort of action squashes the small person. |
| 264 | D Finlay | I don't know all the details of Rhetta case, but as an active trade unionist we need to stick together. Devided we fall.
Good luck Rhetta. |